write the possible reason for putting up such a business

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

1.

"The Road Not Taken" by Robert Frost explores the theme of choices and their impact on one's life. Throughout the poem, Frost develops this theme by depicting a moment of decision-making and reflecting on the consequences that arise from choosing one path over another. The speaker is faced with a fork in the road and must make a choice that will shape his future. The writer develops the theme by presenting the diverging paths as symbolic representations of life's choices. The two roads in the poem are described as equally fair, suggesting that the speaker is confronted with two viable options. However, Frost highlights the speaker's dilemma by noting that he cannot take both paths simultaneously. This creates a sense of tension and the realization that choices involve sacrifices and the potential for regret.

Additionally, the poem explores the theme through the speaker's reflection on his decision. The line "I took the one less traveled by" indicates that the speaker made a choice that differed from the common or popular path. This suggests an individualistic approach, emphasizing the importance of personal agency and the unique paths we choose for ourselves. The speaker's acknowledgement that his choice has made "all the difference" implies that our decisions shape our lives and have a lasting impact.

Furthermore, the specific details in the poem contribute to the development of the theme. The description of the paths as "grassy and wanted wear" signifies the allure of the unknown and the desire for exploration. The mention of the leaves that had not been stepped on implies the potential for new experiences and undiscovered opportunities. These details highlight the significance of choices and the potential for growth and self-discovery that comes from taking a different path.

2.

In the excerpt of "The Egg" by Sherwood Anderson, Father is portrayed as a hardworking, responsible, and practical person. His actions and interactions with others advance the plot and develop the theme by highlighting the theme of duty and sacrifice. Father's character is developed through his dedication to his work and his commitment to providing for his family. Father's actions of waking up early, tending to the chickens, and attending to his farm chores demonstrate his sense of responsibility and diligence. He is described as a man who "never wasted a minute" and worked "like a machine." This portrayal underscores his work ethic and his commitment to fulfilling his duties. It also sets up the contrast between Father's practical mindset and the dreamy, imaginative nature of the young boy.

Father's interactions with the young boy also serve to advance the plot and develop the theme. He is depicted as a practical and no-nonsense figure, dismissing the boy's fanciful ideas about the egg being an enchanted object. Father's response, "Just an egg," highlights his down-to-earth nature and his focus on the practicalities of life. This interaction contrasts with the boy's imaginative perspective and sets the stage for the conflict and tension that will drive the story forward.

3.

In the given sentence from "Twelve Years a Slave" by Solomon Northup, the figurative meaning and imagery play an important role in conveying the author's perspective and emotions. The phrase "subtle and inhuman monsters in the shape of men" is a metaphor that figuratively represents the slave traders and kidnappers who took the author away from his home and family. By comparing them to monsters, Northup emphasizes their cruelty and dehumanization. The phrase "designedly luring me away from home and family, and liberty, for the sake of gold" also contains figurative meaning and imagery. The word "luring" suggests a deliberate and manipulative action, emphasizing the deceptive nature of the kidnappers' intentions. The use of "gold" symbolizes the monetary gain and profit that motivated these individuals to engage in the slave trade.

The imagery and symbolism in this sentence highlight the author's feelings of betrayal, injustice, and the dehumanizing nature of slavery. Through the figurative language, Northup portrays the slave traders as immoral beings who prioritize financial gain over the well-being and freedom of others. The sentence aims to evoke an emotional response from the readers, emphasizing the harsh realities of the author's experiences and the broader issue of slavery.

4.

In his speech "Give Me Liberty, or Give Me Death!" delivered by Patrick Henry in 1775, he presents a compelling argument for the American colonies to take up arms against British oppression. Henry's main claim is that the colonists should not passively submit to the tyranny of British rule but instead fight for their freedom and independence. He argues that the British government has shown a disregard for the colonists' rights and freedoms, and he emphasizes the urgency of the situation, urging his audience to take immediate action.independence. Henry's claims are supported with relevant and sufficient evidence throughout his speech. He references past events, such as the Stamp Act and the Boston Massacre, to highlight the history of British oppression and the colonists' grievances. He also appeals to the emotions of his audience by evoking a sense of patriotism and the desire for liberty. For example, he states, "Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery?" This rhetorical question aims to make his listeners realize the value of freedom and the need to fight for it.

In terms of reasoning, Henry employs effective techniques to support his argument. He uses logical reasoning to connect the colonists' actions with their ultimate goal of achieving liberty. He argues that peaceful means of protest have been exhausted and that armed resistance is the only remaining option. He also makes use of rhetorical devices, such as repetition and parallelism, to emphasize his points and make his speech more persuasive.

While Henry's speech is passionate and persuasive, it does contain elements of fallacious reasoning. For instance, he employs some emotional appeals and generalizations, which may be considered less objective forms of reasoning. However, considering the context of the speech as a persuasive call to action, these techniques can be seen as effective in rallying support for the cause of American independence.

you can do bread. heres some helpful number for you

price of bread $1.25   $5.00   $9.00   $15.00

person one         10          2          0            0

person two           5           4          1            0

person three        20         10        5             1

person four           2             1         0           0

person 5                8             2       2             0

person 6                 5            5        3           2

person 7                   15           3       1         0

person 8                    1             0       0        0

person 9                      25         5         2       1

person 10                     8            5         3      2

hope this helps if im not too late

you can do bread. heres some helpful number for you

price of bread $1.25   $5.00   $9.00   $15.00

person one         10          2          0            0

person two           5           4          1            0

person three        20         10        5             1

person four           2             1         0           0

person 5                8             2       2             0

person 6                 5            5        3           2

person 7                   15           3       1         0

person 8                    1             0       0        0

person 9                      25         5         2       1

person 10                     8            5         3      2

hope this helps if im not too late

The first technique is to keep the audience engaged to the topic that you are speaking about. This gets the audience thinking and engaging immediately. The second technique is to break the ice. Using an ice breaker helps your audience form a connection with you and gets them to interact with you, the speaker, more. The third technique is to seek the wisdom of the audience. This would mean asking questions. The final technique is to keep the audience focused. One way to do this would be through maintaining eye contact.

Explanation:

The first technique is to keep the audience engaged to the topic that you are speaking about. This gets the audience thinking and engaging immediately. The second technique is to break the ice. Using an ice breaker helps your audience form a connection with you and gets them to interact with you, the speaker, more. The third technique is to seek the wisdom of the audience. This would mean asking questions. The final technique is to keep the audience focused. One way to do this would be through maintaining eye contact.

Explanation:

im not really good with debates but i like ta argue so ill try

hope this helped :)

Explanation:

Loyalist or Patriot

Various events of the 1700s led colonists to develop strong beliefs regarding the British government. The Trial of Peter Zenger, The Proclamation of 1763, the Boston Massacre combined with constantly changing taxes and rules that governed them made many think that self-governance was the best path for the colonies. Others felt that the King and his appointed officials had their best interests in mind and preferred to stay loyal to the crown. Later, during the American Revolution, most colonists took one side or the other. Either they were Patriots or loyalist. Patriots believed that the colonies should break away from England and govern themselves. Loyalist believed that the colonies.  Other famous loyalists include Thomas Hutchinson (governor of Massachusetts colony), Andrew Allen, John Butler (leader of the loyalists troops Butler 's Rangers), and David Mathews (mayor of New York City).  What happened to loyalists during the war?  

Life for the loyalists became increasingly difficult during the war. Loyalists who lived in areas controlled by the patriots were in constant danger from radical patriots. Many of them lost their homes and businesses.  

Many loyalists left the country and went back to Britain. Others decided to help the British fight the patriots. They either joined the British army or formed their own groups of fighters such as the Loyal Greens and the Royal American Regiment.  

What happened to the loyalists after the war?  

Many loyalists moved to England after the war ended. A lot of them lost their fortunes and land that they had built up over years in the Americas. In some cases the British government paid them for their loyalty, but it was usually not nearly as much as they had lost. The United States government wanted the loyalists to stay. They felt the new country could use their skills and education. Few stayed, however.

In early America, there were three factions that developed within the colonies- Loyalists, Patriots, and fence-sitters (neutral). This melting pot of different ideas, goals, and outlooks is what made pre-Revolutionary War America so volatile. These three factions seem easy to identify, Patriots wanted freedom from the crown all together, Loyalists want to stay British, and fence-sitters want to stay out of the political battle all together. However, it goes much farther than that, many different backgrounds and goals drove these people forward. Many did not take up the title of Loyalist or Patriot unless the struggles affected them directly, many more only took sides when it was profitably to.

Not because they believed in their cause but it was a way to save their financial wealth.

im not really good with debates but i like ta argue so ill try

hope this helped :)

Explanation:

Loyalist or Patriot

Various events of the 1700s led colonists to develop strong beliefs regarding the British government. The Trial of Peter Zenger, The Proclamation of 1763, the Boston Massacre combined with constantly changing taxes and rules that governed them made many think that self-governance was the best path for the colonies. Others felt that the King and his appointed officials had their best interests in mind and preferred to stay loyal to the crown. Later, during the American Revolution, most colonists took one side or the other. Either they were Patriots or loyalist. Patriots believed that the colonies should break away from England and govern themselves. Loyalist believed that the colonies.  Other famous loyalists include Thomas Hutchinson (governor of Massachusetts colony), Andrew Allen, John Butler (leader of the loyalists troops Butler 's Rangers), and David Mathews (mayor of New York City).  What happened to loyalists during the war?  

Life for the loyalists became increasingly difficult during the war. Loyalists who lived in areas controlled by the patriots were in constant danger from radical patriots. Many of them lost their homes and businesses.  

Many loyalists left the country and went back to Britain. Others decided to help the British fight the patriots. They either joined the British army or formed their own groups of fighters such as the Loyal Greens and the Royal American Regiment.  

What happened to the loyalists after the war?  

Many loyalists moved to England after the war ended. A lot of them lost their fortunes and land that they had built up over years in the Americas. In some cases the British government paid them for their loyalty, but it was usually not nearly as much as they had lost. The United States government wanted the loyalists to stay. They felt the new country could use their skills and education. Few stayed, however.

In early America, there were three factions that developed within the colonies- Loyalists, Patriots, and fence-sitters (neutral). This melting pot of different ideas, goals, and outlooks is what made pre-Revolutionary War America so volatile. These three factions seem easy to identify, Patriots wanted freedom from the crown all together, Loyalists want to stay British, and fence-sitters want to stay out of the political battle all together. However, it goes much farther than that, many different backgrounds and goals drove these people forward. Many did not take up the title of Loyalist or Patriot unless the struggles affected them directly, many more only took sides when it was profitably to.

Not because they believed in their cause but it was a way to save their financial wealth.

C. Fair Credit Reporting Act

Explanation:

Fair Credit Reporting Act was brought into action to lay governance on the credit bureaus regarding their consumers' credit information. The act presents the rules and regulations to be followed to obtain and present the credit details of the consumers. Also, it looks over the manner in which the details are shared with the consumers and others for various other purposes.

According to the given excerpt, the Fair Credit Reporting Act allows Carlos to take an action in case of any error found in his credit report.