08.03.2021

Driven by instinct, the salmon rushed upstream, the salmon neither knew nor cared about the hungry bears that awaited them.
Which revision corrects the sentence?
Driven by instinct, the salmon rushed upstream, they neither knew nor cared about the hungry bears that awaited them.
Driven by instinct, the salmon rushed upstream and neither knew nor cared about the hungry bears that awaited them.
Driven by instinct, the salmon rushed upstream. Neither knew nor cared about the hungry bears that awaited them.
Driven by instinct, the salmon rushed upstream; They neither knew nor cared about the hungry bears that awaited them.

. 17

Step-by-step answer

06.12.2022, solved by verified expert
Unlock the full answer

Answer:

A. Driven by instinct, the salmon rushed upstream, they neither knew nor cared about the hungry bears that awaited them.

Step-by-step explanation:

This is known as a comma fault in English where sentences or independent clauses are improperly connected.
Hence, we can see that option A contained the independent clauses and linking conjunction and are connected properly.

It is was helpful?

Faq

StudenGPT
Step-by-step answer
P Answered by Studen AI
The correct revision that fixes the comma splice in the sentence is:

"Driven by instinct, the salmon rushed upstream and neither knew nor cared about the hungry bears that awaited them."

Here's the step-by-step explanation:

1. A comma splice occurs when two independent clauses (complete sentences) are mistakenly separated by a comma instead of being properly joined or separated by appropriate punctuation.

2. In the original sentence, there is a comma splice because the two independent clauses "Driven by instinct, the salmon rushed upstream" and "the salmon neither knew nor cared about the hungry bears that awaited them" are separated by a comma.

3. Option 1, "Driven by instinct, the salmon rushed upstream, they neither knew nor cared about the hungry bears that awaited them," does not correct the comma splice. It simply removes the second occurrence of "salmon" but leaves the comma splice.

4. Option 3, "Driven by instinct, the salmon rushed upstream; They neither knew nor cared about the hungry bears that awaited them," replaces the comma with a semicolon. While the semicolon is a valid punctuation mark to join independent clauses, it creates a stylistically awkward pause in this context.

5. Option 4, "Driven by instinct, the salmon rushed upstream. Neither knew nor cared about the hungry bears that awaited them," splits the independent clauses into separate sentences. This fixes the comma splice, but it fails to show the connection between the two clauses.

6. The correct option, option 2, "Driven by instinct, the salmon rushed upstream and neither knew nor cared about the hungry bears that awaited them," uses the coordinating conjunction "and" to properly join the two independent clauses. This revision maintains the intended meaning and flow of the sentence.

Therefore, the correct revision is: "Driven by instinct, the salmon rushed upstream and neither knew nor cared about the hungry bears that awaited them."
StudenGPT
Step-by-step answer
P Answered by Studen AI
The sentence "Driven by instinct, the salmon rushed upstream, the salmon neither knew nor cared about the hungry bears that awaited them." contains a comma splice, which means that two independent clauses are incorrectly joined together with only a comma.

To correct the comma splice, you can use several methods, such as adding a coordinating conjunction, separating the clauses into separate sentences, or using a semicolon. Let's examine each provided revision to determine which one corrects the sentence:

1. "Driven by instinct, the salmon rushed upstream and neither knew nor cared about the hungry bears that awaited them."
This revision adds the coordinating conjunction "and" to properly join the two independent clauses. It correctly separates the clauses and retains the meaning of the original sentence. This seems like a suitable correction.

2. "Driven by instinct, the salmon rushed upstream; They neither knew nor cared about the hungry bears that awaited them."
This revision separates the clauses using a semicolon. While semicolons are typically used to connect closely related independent clauses, the lack of a conjunction makes this revision awkward. Additionally, the pronoun "they" in the second clause is ambiguous as it doesn't have a clear antecedent. Therefore, this revision is not the best choice.

3. "Driven by instinct, the salmon rushed upstream. Neither knew nor cared about the hungry bears that awaited them."
In this revision, the clauses are separated into two separate sentences. Although it effectively resolves the comma splice issue, it also changes the structure of the original sentence. It creates a more abrupt and fragmented style, which may not be ideal for this context.

4. "Driven by instinct, the salmon rushed upstream, they neither knew nor cared about the hungry bears that awaited them."
This revision introduces the same comma splice error as the original sentence. The second clause is not properly connected to the main clause, resulting in an incorrect structure. Therefore, this revision does not correct the sentence.

Based on the analysis, the most appropriate revision to correct the sentence and fix the comma splice is option 1: "Driven by instinct, the salmon rushed upstream and neither knew nor cared about the hungry bears that awaited them."
StudenGPT
Step-by-step answer
P Answered by Studen AI
The revised sentence that corrects the original is:

"Driven by instinct, the salmon rushed upstream, and neither knew nor cared about the hungry bears that awaited them."

This revision corrects the sentence by using a coordinating conjunction "and" to connect the two independent clauses, indicating that the salmon were unaware and unconcerned about the hungry bears. The other options either have incorrect punctuation or do not properly connect the two ideas in the sentence. The use of a semicolon or starting a new sentence without any connecting word would not accurately convey the intended meaning.
English
Step-by-step answer
P Answered by Specialist

Answer:

A. Driven by instinct, the salmon rushed upstream, they neither knew nor cared about the hungry bears that awaited them.

Step-by-step explanation:

This is known as a comma fault in English where sentences or independent clauses are improperly connected.
Hence, we can see that option A contained the independent clauses and linking conjunction and are connected properly.

StudenGPT
Step-by-step answer
P Answered by Studen AI
The sentence contains a comma splice, which means that two independent clauses (complete sentences) are incorrectly joined together with only a comma. To correct this error, we need to choose an option that properly separates the two independent clauses or combines them correctly.

Let's analyze the options provided:

a. "Driven by instinct, the salmon rushed upstream. Neither knew nor cared about the hungry bears that awaited them."
In this option, the independent clauses are correctly separated by a period, which creates two separate sentences. This successfully eliminates the comma splice error.

b. "Driven by instinct, the salmon rushed upstream; They neither knew nor cared about the hungry bears that awaited them."
Option B separates the clauses using a semicolon, which is another valid way to correct a comma splice. However, it incorrectly uses the pronoun "they" to refer to the salmon instead of repeating the noun "salmon," which makes the sentence confusing.

c. "Driven by instinct, the salmon rushed upstream, they neither knew nor cared about the hungry bears that awaited them."
Option C maintains the comma splice error, as it joins the two independent clauses with only a comma. It does not provide a proper correction.

d. "Driven by instinct, the salmon rushed upstream and neither knew nor cared about the hungry bears that awaited them."
Option D correctly combines the two independent clauses using the conjunction "and." This conjunction properly connects the ideas while eliminating the comma splice.

Therefore, the correct revision is option D: "Driven by instinct, the salmon rushed upstream and neither knew nor cared about the hungry bears that awaited them."
English
Step-by-step answer
P Answered by Specialist
Options:
A.) California is an excellent location for immigrants who are seeking land to farm.
B.) California has many immigrants who have grown a large supply of healthy crops.
C.) California is the best source for government loans for building railroads in the state.
D.) California has the most plentiful resources for people who want a healthy lifestyle.

Answer:
D.) California has the most plentiful resources for people who want a healthy lifestyle.

Explanation:
The poster named "CALIFORNIA the CORNUCOPIA of the WORLD ROOM for MILLIONS of IMMIGRANTS 43.795.000. ACRES of GOVERNMENT LANDS UNTAKEN RAILROAD & PRIVATE LAND FOR MILLIONS OF FARMERS!"

A poster’s job is to promote an idea, event, product or person. So here the poster of California promotes itself as a place full of resources that offers people staying there a healthy and peaceful lifestyle. It is a way of advertising and to spread the message. California is generally a good place to stay in. It is the best place for immigrants who seek to find a living for themselves. That’s what the poster would help to do, attract more immigrants to the place.
Options:
A.) California is an excellent location for immigrants who are seeking land to farm.
B.)
English
Step-by-step answer
P Answered by PhD

Answer:

There is gradual shift of point of view in the story “An Occurrence
at Owl Creek Bridge”.

Step-by-step explanation:

●''Owl Creek Bridge'' isn't a first-person narration, meaning that it's not told from the perspective of the main character, meaning Farquhar. Instead, the text comes from a third-person narrator, or told by an external force or character.

●In some sense, Bierce presents readers with an unreliable third-person narrator. The narrator knows, the entire time, that Peyton is dreaming, but tricks readers into thinking that Peyton has escaped. By representing the scenes of Peyton's dream as reality, the narrator toys with the reader's emotions.

●In “An Occurrence at Owl Creek Bridge” a couple of shifts throughout the story change the entire story's point of view essentially bewildering readers. For instance, in paragraph five, a shift occurs when Peyton Farquhar closes his eyes right before he is to be hung.

●In paragraph 36 of "An Occurrence at Owl Creek Bridge," Bierce shifts from past tense to present tense. Bierce writes that "now he sees another scene . . . he stands at the gate of his own home." The effect here is that the reader believes Farquhar has truly escaped and made it home.

English
Step-by-step answer
P Answered by PhD

Answer:

According to the students learn in different ways such example as games, animations, family, and the school etc.

Step-by-step explanation:

The term student refers to learn the knowledge and the development of the body. They also the gain the experience. The students are the learn as the under the guidance of the teacher. The teacher is the teach to the students. The student is the learn on the different ways to the consumption of the different knowledge.

According to the student are the learn on the different ways are;

Animation video to the easily describe the concept and the remember to the easy in the task.

Games are the learn to mistakes not to repeated.

Family are the firstly teach to the student.

School are the teacher to the guide in the career.

As a result, the student is the learn on the different in the way.

English
Step-by-step answer
P Answered by PhD

Answer:

In lines 578-579, Mrs. Keeney tells her husband why she wanted to sail with him: "I wanted to see
you the hero they make you out to be in Homeport." In what way does the voyage change the way she sees her husband? Cite evidence from the play in your answer.
Mrs. Keeney sees that her husband is a hard man who can be brutal toward his crew in pursuit of
his goal. In lines 650-653, she tells him, "You want to live up to your silly reputation even if you do
have to beat and starve men and drive me mad to do it."
At the end of the play, Captain Keeney breaks his promise to his wife, even though he says he loves
her. What is the motivation for his behavior, beyond simple economic opportunity?
Keeney's pride pushes him to put his goal of
getting the oil ahead of any feelings for his wife. He needs to get the oil to feel strong and to prove himself. At the same time, he denies that his wife is really going mad, saying, "I know you're foolin' me" (lines 892-893). He may feel justified in staying "jest a little while longer" at sea because he can't believe she is actually losing her mind and because she insisted on making the voyage in the first place.

Step-by-step explanation:

make necessary changes as required to make the points better

Try asking the Studen AI a question.

It will provide an instant answer!

FREE