What is strange about the ceremony of loss in The Giver?

Passage 1 focuses on the adventures of two Maasai boys, Korinko and Mejooli, as they set out to find a beehive and collect honey. The passage showcases the boys' daily life, their responsibilities within the community, and their encounter with a special bird called the Honeyguide. On the other hand, Passage 2 is a poem titled "Snake" by D. H. Lawrence, where the speaker encounters a snake at a water-trough and contemplates whether or not to kill it.

Although the themes in the two passages are different, they both explore the relationship between humans and nature. In Passage 1, the Maasai boys interact with their environment, relying on their knowledge and skills to find honey. They form a symbiotic relationship with the Honeyguide bird, which guides them to the beehive in exchange for a reward. The passage highlights the harmony between humans and animals, where they each benefit from their interaction.

In Passage 2, the speaker encounters a snake at the water-trough. The speaker experiences conflicting emotions regarding whether to kill the snake or let it live. The poem delves into the speaker's internal struggle, contemplating notions of fear, honor, and respect for nature. The encounter with the snake raises questions about the moral choices humans face when interacting with the natural world.

The common thread between both passages lies in the appreciation and respect for nature. In Passage 1, the Maasai boys and the Honeyguide bird cooperate to obtain honey, demonstrating a harmonious relationship with the natural world. In Passage 2, the speaker experiences a sense of admiration and reverence for the snake, despite societal expectations to kill it. Both passages prompt the reader to reflect on their own relationship with nature and the ethical considerations that arise when interacting with animals and the environment.

To support this comparison, evidence from the texts can be used, such as the Maasai boys' reliance on the Honeyguide bird in Passage 1, the boys' enjoyment of honey and their appreciation for the bird's guidance. In Passage 2, evidence can be drawn from the speaker's mixed feelings towards the snake, their regretful action of throwing a log at the water-trough, and their longing for the snake's return.

Based on the passage in paragraphs 7-8, the inference best supported by the text is:

D. Young people, who don't fully understand the risk of opposing the capital, are upset about the refusal.

Let's break down the passage to understand why this inference is the most accurate conclusion from the information given:

1. The passage states that in all important matters, the citizens can always count on a refusal. This implies that the citizens expect and receive a refusal consistently.

2. The passage also mentions that official occasions designed to receive the refusal are not just a formality but are taken seriously. This suggests that there is some significance attached to the refusal, even though the citizens do not return disappointed or tired.

3. The narrator mentions a certain age group, roughly between seventeen and twenty, who are not content. These young people are described as being incapable of foreseeing the consequences of their ideas, even the least significant ones.

Based on this information, we can infer that these young people are upset about the refusal. The passage does not provide direct evidence of their discontent, but it emphasizes how these young individuals lack the ability to understand the potential risks involved in opposing the capital. Therefore, they may feel frustrated or dissatisfied when their ideas are refused.

Option D is the most supported inference because it connects the dissatisfaction of the young people to their lack of understanding about the potential consequences of their ideas. The passage does not provide enough evidence to support the other options.

The best-supported inference from the passage is option B: The people of the town have come to expect—and even rely on—the refusal.

In the passage, it is stated that "without this refusal one simply cannot get along." This implies that the refusal plays a crucial role in the town's dynamics and that people have grown accustomed to it. Additionally, the passage mentions that people go to the official occasions "full of expectation and in all seriousness" but return "not disappointed or tired." This suggests that they have become accustomed to the outcome of the refusal and have come to expect it.

Therefore, based on the given information, it can be inferred that the people of the town have come to expect and even rely on the refusal, making option B the most supported inference.

The conclusion that can be drawn about Jane from her description of meeting Mr. Rochester for the first time is that B) Jane is nervous about meeting Mr. Rochester and looks to Mrs. Fairfax for security.

The conclusion that can be drawn about Jane from her description of meeting Mr. Rochester for the first time is that B) Jane is nervous about meeting Mr. Rochester and looks to Mrs. Fairfax for security.