Participants would do meaningful work with a diverse group of people.
Explanation:
Since it teaches them about teamwork and service it made the most sense and I got it right on i-ready :)
Participants would do meaningful work with a diverse group of people.
Explanation:
Since it teaches them about teamwork and service it made the most sense and I got it right on i-ready :)
its asking you what part of the passage makes the claim true?
Explanation:
i hope this is able to help you.
its asking you what part of the passage makes the claim true?
Explanation:
i hope this is able to help you.
I know that answer choice c and d are incorrect.
"C) while, the President is on board, the term is commonly used >> no comma is need here.
D) while the President, is on board, the term is commonly used" >> still, no comma is needed.
B) while the President is on board the term is commonly used
So A is the answer.
Should read >> While the President is on board, the term is commonly used.
Hope this helps.
Read more on - link
I know that answer choice c and d are incorrect.
"C) while, the President is on board, the term is commonly used >> no comma is need here.
D) while the President, is on board, the term is commonly used" >> still, no comma is needed.
B) while the President is on board the term is commonly used
So A is the answer.
Should read >> While the President is on board, the term is commonly used.
Hope this helps.
Read more on - link
C) Keep it, because it previews the way the rest of the passage will support the thesis about Hale’s authorship with evidence.
Explanation:
The writer should keep the underlined portion of the sentence because, as a thesis statement, it previews the line of reasoning of the passage. With the underlined text included, the writer makes it clear that the rest of the passage will provide strong evidence to support Hale’s authorship of the poem and discredit the idea that Sawyer inspired the poem.
C) Keep it, because it previews the way the rest of the passage will support the thesis about Hale’s authorship with evidence.
Explanation:
The writer should keep the underlined portion of the sentence because, as a thesis statement, it previews the line of reasoning of the passage. With the underlined text included, the writer makes it clear that the rest of the passage will provide strong evidence to support Hale’s authorship of the poem and discredit the idea that Sawyer inspired the poem.
(D) No, because a thesis does not need to provide specifics of an argument or evidence to be a good preview.
Explanation:
The thesis statement does not need to list examples of the specific evidence or details of the reasoning that will be used in a passage. Also, the specific titles of those works are discussed later in the passage, so it is redundant to include them again here. The writer therefore does not need to include the underlined portion of the sentence in the thesis statement.
It is not B because the writer wants the thesis statement to provide a preview of the ideas developed. Including a concession to an opposing viewpoint is not a necessary part of such a thesis. Even if the passage were to develop this acknowledgement of the importance of the works Tyler studied, it would not necessarily need to mention them in the thesis statement.
It will provide an instant answer!