Geography : asked on aj12381
 25.08.2021

Developing formulas for triangles and quadrilaterals

. 4

Faq

Mathematics
Step-by-step answer
P Answered by Specialist

A(n) = L(n) × W(n) and A(n)=0.5n^{2} +2n+2

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given that the length of the rectangular garden is L and width is W.

Also, in terms of 'n',

Length is given by, L(n) = n + 2

Width is given by, W(n) = 0.5n + 1.

Now, we know that, Area of rectangle = Length × Width.

Therefore, area of Kirti's garden is given by, A(n) = L(n) × W(n).

Thus, formula of area in terms of L(n) and W(n) is A(n) = L(n) × W(n).

Moreover, as A(n) = L(n) × W(n).

i.e. A(n) = (n+2) × (0.5n+1)

i.e. A(n)=0.5n^{2} +n+2 \times 0.5n+2

i.e. A(n)=0.5n^{2} +n+n+2

i.e. A(n)=0.5n^{2} +2n+2

Hence, the formula for area in terms of 'n' is A(n)=0.5n^{2} +2n+2.

Mathematics
Step-by-step answer
P Answered by Specialist

A(n) = L(n) × W(n) and A(n)=0.5n^{2} +2n+2

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given that the length of the rectangular garden is L and width is W.

Also, in terms of 'n',

Length is given by, L(n) = n + 2

Width is given by, W(n) = 0.5n + 1.

Now, we know that, Area of rectangle = Length × Width.

Therefore, area of Kirti's garden is given by, A(n) = L(n) × W(n).

Thus, formula of area in terms of L(n) and W(n) is A(n) = L(n) × W(n).

Moreover, as A(n) = L(n) × W(n).

i.e. A(n) = (n+2) × (0.5n+1)

i.e. A(n)=0.5n^{2} +n+2 \times 0.5n+2

i.e. A(n)=0.5n^{2} +n+n+2

i.e. A(n)=0.5n^{2} +2n+2

Hence, the formula for area in terms of 'n' is A(n)=0.5n^{2} +2n+2.

Business
Step-by-step answer
P Answered by Specialist

The overview of the given circumstances is described in the explanation segment below.

Explanation:

(1)...

Non-compete seems to be a standard procedure in several areas of the globe to safeguard information. There must have been 2 factors for something like a non-competent specified period in exchange, as shown in this scenario:

There's got to have been a state secret that is hidden from the public. Witter uses trade secrets for his previous venture.

Neither of the circumstances confirms that realizing as well as trying to teach how and when to start dancing seems to be completely obvious and does not quantity to state secrets. If this were a style of dance that is already recognized mostly to Anthony Murray as well as Witter, therefore the case might have been dissimilar. And while this skill is trained to every learner, it isn't a secret.

Interestingly, Witter doesn't use trade secrets because it is a common experience of dance to learn well how to dance. Haven't broken the non-competition.

(2)...

Buckingham may, if he indeed wishes, promote to prevent Greenberg from operating on such formulations, and even using them for many other businesses, as he created certain formulas although employed at Buckingham. This also acknowledges that all these formulas have been created again for the corporation of Buckingham and therefore any exposure of such formulas to some of its rival businesses directly impacts the company of Buckingham.

They should negotiate through Brite the current landlord of Greenberg, not to require Greenberg to provide it, and that therefore Brite, and in so doing, is indicting the requirements including its Intellectual Property Act. Nevertheless, it seems from either the content of the issue that there was no Non-Disclosure Agreement among Buckingham as well as Greenberg.However although there would have been a long-standing contractual partnership involving Brite & Buckingham, hardly any agreement concerning digital content as well as Trade Secret sharing including non-disclosure had already been concluded.

In consideration of it all, it would be very unlikely against Buckingham to just get a judge's order targeting Greenberg as well as Briton to prosecute them or even to prevent themselves from being used formulas established by Greenberg although employed for Buckingham.

Business
Step-by-step answer
P Answered by Master

The overview of the given circumstances is described in the explanation segment below.

Explanation:

(1)...

Non-compete seems to be a standard procedure in several areas of the globe to safeguard information. There must have been 2 factors for something like a non-competent specified period in exchange, as shown in this scenario:

There's got to have been a state secret that is hidden from the public. Witter uses trade secrets for his previous venture.

Neither of the circumstances confirms that realizing as well as trying to teach how and when to start dancing seems to be completely obvious and does not quantity to state secrets. If this were a style of dance that is already recognized mostly to Anthony Murray as well as Witter, therefore the case might have been dissimilar. And while this skill is trained to every learner, it isn't a secret.

Interestingly, Witter doesn't use trade secrets because it is a common experience of dance to learn well how to dance. Haven't broken the non-competition.

(2)...

Buckingham may, if he indeed wishes, promote to prevent Greenberg from operating on such formulations, and even using them for many other businesses, as he created certain formulas although employed at Buckingham. This also acknowledges that all these formulas have been created again for the corporation of Buckingham and therefore any exposure of such formulas to some of its rival businesses directly impacts the company of Buckingham.

They should negotiate through Brite the current landlord of Greenberg, not to require Greenberg to provide it, and that therefore Brite, and in so doing, is indicting the requirements including its Intellectual Property Act. Nevertheless, it seems from either the content of the issue that there was no Non-Disclosure Agreement among Buckingham as well as Greenberg.However although there would have been a long-standing contractual partnership involving Brite & Buckingham, hardly any agreement concerning digital content as well as Trade Secret sharing including non-disclosure had already been concluded.

In consideration of it all, it would be very unlikely against Buckingham to just get a judge's order targeting Greenberg as well as Briton to prosecute them or even to prevent themselves from being used formulas established by Greenberg although employed for Buckingham.

Mathematics
Step-by-step answer
P Answered by PhD

The study is not well designed because the formulas A and B are not compared with the original formula.

Hence, option B is correct.

Step-by-step explanation:

Given information:

As the company needs to check the flavors of nachos which are newly launched and to sell a particular amount the nachos should be liked by the customers.

Now, the sample of 50 customers are taken to taste the nachos as compared  to previous one and if the sample is being liked by the customers then surely the demand will increase but the formula is not compared with the original hence the study is not well designed.

From, the above observation one can conclude that the study is not well designed because the formulas A and B are not compared with the original formula.

Hence option B is correct.

For more information visit:

link

Mathematics
Step-by-step answer
P Answered by PhD

b. This study is not well designed because formulas A and B are not compared with the original formula is the best descriptionfor this study

Step-by-step explanation:

This study was mainly conducted to know about the customer's preference for a new formula of corn chips which related with the original formula ., whether the customer's like the new formula than the old one.,so the company must include the old formula along with the two new formula's for customer's consideration. But .,Here they introduced and tested only the new formula's.,

So.,

Comparison of all the three formulas is must., to know about the exact preference of customer's on new formula's than the old formula.,so option b is preferable

Mathematics
Step-by-step answer
P Answered by PhD

The study is not well designed because the formulas A and B are not compared with the original formula.

Hence, option B is correct.

Step-by-step explanation:

Given information:

As the company needs to check the flavors of nachos which are newly launched and to sell a particular amount the nachos should be liked by the customers.

Now, the sample of 50 customers are taken to taste the nachos as compared  to previous one and if the sample is being liked by the customers then surely the demand will increase but the formula is not compared with the original hence the study is not well designed.

From, the above observation one can conclude that the study is not well designed because the formulas A and B are not compared with the original formula.

Hence option B is correct.

For more information visit:

link

Business
Step-by-step answer
P Answered by PhD

Justin works at a top accounting firm in Los Angeles, and his responsibilities include developing individual and departmental goals and generating financial analysis across departments and the enterprise as a whole for the executive team to review. Justin's duties provide value- added to his company and would be categorized as occurring at the different Information levels.

Explanation:

The levels at which the information in an organisation is used refers to the information levels. Information can be used in tactical, strategic and at operational level. The level of information and the level of the importance that is given to the employees of an organisation and it groups are directly related with each other.

The strategic level information are related to the strategies, goals of the organisation. Tactical information relates to the information related to the achievement of the short term goals and also important in achieving the profitability of an organisation. In the example, duties of Justin provides value-added to the company he works and would be categorized as occurring at the different Information levels.

Try asking the Studen AI a question.

It will provide an instant answer!

FREE