Idk the answer can I help me ?

The correct answers are:

1)In this passage the authorship point of view allows the narrator to A)tells a story more objectively.

2)The effect of telling the sory from a third person limited point of view is B) The reader can experience everythin Levi thought and felt.

3) The point of view in the story would be accurately described as B)Third person limited.

The second question already states that the narrator is telling the story from a third person limited point of view. This kind of narrative voice only knows what one character felt or thought, and the story is strongly focused on him, but we also see what surrounds him. This is different from a third person omniscient, that would be a god-like figure who could switch focus from one character to another, knowing what everyone felt or did.

This point of view allows to tell a story more objectively since we do not receive the information directly from the character and his limited views like a first person narrator would. We know what the main character is doing and thinking without the obvservations or the subjective perspectives of the characters. We are "watching" the plot from outside the frame.

The correct answers are:

1)In this passage the authorship point of view allows the narrator to A)tells a story more objectively.

2)The effect of telling the sory from a third person limited point of view is B) The reader can experience everythin Levi thought and felt.

3) The point of view in the story would be accurately described as B)Third person limited.

The second question already states that the narrator is telling the story from a third person limited point of view. This kind of narrative voice only knows what one character felt or thought, and the story is strongly focused on him, but we also see what surrounds him. This is different from a third person omniscient, that would be a god-like figure who could switch focus from one character to another, knowing what everyone felt or did.

This point of view allows to tell a story more objectively since we do not receive the information directly from the character and his limited views like a first person narrator would. We know what the main character is doing and thinking without the obvservations or the subjective perspectives of the characters. We are "watching" the plot from outside the frame.

me either lol

Explanation:

me either lol

Explanation:

Responses may vary but should include some or all of the following information: The first land run occurred on April 22, 1889. All land grants were claimed within a few hours. An estimated 11,000 homestead claims were made that day. It is estimated that 50,000 to 100,000 boomers participated. These boomers were called eighty-niners. The land run was chaotic and difficult, with many people rushing to claim land or buy lots in railway townships. This boom in population helped pave the way for Oklahoma to become a state.

Explanation:

I hope this helps!

Responses may vary but should include some or all of the following information: The first land run occurred on April 22, 1889. All land grants were claimed within a few hours. An estimated 11,000 homestead claims were made that day. It is estimated that 50,000 to 100,000 boomers participated. These boomers were called eighty-niners. The land run was chaotic and difficult, with many people rushing to claim land or buy lots in railway townships. This boom in population helped pave the way for Oklahoma to become a state.

Explanation:

I hope this helps!

When you write an argumentative essay, the first thing you need to think about is what point of view you will defend. This will be your thesis, or the main idea of the essay. The rest of the essay will provide arguments that will try to persuade the audience of supporting your point of view.

An outline for this essay would look something like this:

1. Introduction

1.1 What is same sex marriage?

1.2 What is the current status of same sex marriage?

1.3 What is your point of view?

2. Body

2.1 Reasons why same sex marriage should be legal.

2.2 Possible counterarguments.

2.3 Responses to counterarguments.

3. Conclusion (Restate the thesis)

The strategy to evaluate these expressions is called PEMDAS.

Step-by-step explanation:

We're going to be following the rule of PEMDAS:

Keep in mind that multiplication/division and addition/subtraction are done from left to right.

In the first expression (written above), we'll first evaluate everything inside the brackets first (brackets are used when there are parentheses inside of it - but they serve the same function). There are parentheses in these brackets, so that will be the absolute first step in evaluating.

Solve for then rewrite the expression.

Now finish evaluating inside the parentheses by dividing 15 by 5.

The last step to evaluate the expression is to subtract 3 from 15.

Evaluate everything inside the the brackets. Start with the parentheses since that is first according to PEMDAS. Add 1 and 3 together then rewrite the expression.

Exponents are solved next after parentheses in PEMDAS, so evaluate the exponent.

Multiplication is done before subtraction, so multiply 3 and 16 together.

Finish evaluating inside the brackets by subtracting 48 from 50.

The last step in evaluating the second expression is to multiply 4 and 2 together, which gives us 8.