It emphasizes the selfish and superficial motivation behind volunteer opportunities.
Option C.
Explanation:
There has been use of a metaphor "gold star" by the speaker in the speech in a particular paragraph. The use of that has been done to show the selfish purposes of some people who show that they are volunteers but they do it for their own good.
In that paragraph, the speaker says that the volunteers decide to open up and build a school. But the motive and the purpose behind this is not the good of others but for their own motive of having a gold star in their own resume which will help them in their professional career.
the counterclaim of this argument is that there are a better ways to make a difference than mixing tourism with volunteering
Explanation:
because tourism mixed with volunteering often does more harm than good.
The best answer to the question: How does the speaker´s metaphor of a gold star in paragraph 3 support the purpose of the speech, would be: It emphasizes the selfish and superficial motivation behind voluntour opportunities.
Explanation:
In this Speech to the Student Body of Evergreen High, on Voluntourism: An Opportunity Too Good to be True, it seems that the author is completely against the idea of voluntourism, equating it to more of an economical, and totally selfish activity, rather than an opportunity to both do something for someone else, and a learning experience. Among the many arguments used against voluntourism, the author states that people who go in these adventures are mostly looking for good points on their resumes, as a way to show experience on a field, and show social interests that will look good. Thus, he insists that much of the motivation behind voluntourism vs volunteering, is actually selfish and superficial, and this idea is supported by people seeking the "gold star" to be placed on their resume.
The correct answer is "Voluntourism is a worthwhile way to make a difference and travel the world.
Explanation: The claim throughout the article is that while those who "voluntour" think they are making a difference by their efforts, there are a wealth of problems that occur because of their presence. The essence of the article (or claim) is that "voluntourism" is not really a good thing. Thus, the counterclaim is the choice listed.
the counterclaim of this argument is that there are a better ways to make a difference than mixing tourism with volunteering
Explanation:
because tourism mixed with volunteering often does more harm than good.
3. The correct answer is Yes, because the Paycheck Fairness Act is a legal measure needed to close the wage gap between men and women.
The Paycheck Fairness Act is a labor law that adds more protections to the former, old Equal Pay Act of 1963. And it is a law to combat the gender pay gap in the U.S. So, the second answer is the correct one because it explains exactly what the law is and shows evidence to Warren's argument. The first option is wrong because it is not designed to open up more job opportunities, it's only about the salary gap between genders.
5. The correct answer is number one, People should receive equal pay for equal work.
Warren says, "It would help ensure that salary differences have something to do with the actual job that they are doing, and not just because they are women." Therefore, equal pay, equal work is the correct choice here. The other options are just pieces of what Warren said but twisted. For example, she also says "The effects of this discrimination are real, and they are long lasting. Today, more young women go to college than men, but unequal pay makes it harder for them to pay back student loans." But she is not saying that wages should be paid based on how much you owe, but she's stating a fact that will help her support her arguments.
6. The correct answer is number four, Yes, because she specifies several ways in which the act will end discrimination while preserving justified differences in pay.
She says, "Employers can still pay different workers different salaries based on factors like skill, performance, expertise, seniority, and so forth—the Paycheck Fairness Act doesn't touch any of that." She has numbered many reasons and shown data of the pay differences between genders. And she is now explaining that of course employers can and should pay their employees different wages based on certain factors that are justified but not because of gender.
3. The correct answer is Yes, because the Paycheck Fairness Act is a legal measure needed to close the wage gap between men and women.
The Paycheck Fairness Act is a labor law that adds more protections to the former, old Equal Pay Act of 1963. And it is a law to combat the gender pay gap in the U.S. So, the second answer is the correct one because it explains exactly what the law is and shows evidence to Warren's argument. The first option is wrong because it is not designed to open up more job opportunities, it's only about the salary gap between genders.
5. The correct answer is number one, People should receive equal pay for equal work.
Warren says, "It would help ensure that salary differences have something to do with the actual job that they are doing, and not just because they are women." Therefore, equal pay, equal work is the correct choice here. The other options are just pieces of what Warren said but twisted. For example, she also says "The effects of this discrimination are real, and they are long lasting. Today, more young women go to college than men, but unequal pay makes it harder for them to pay back student loans." But she is not saying that wages should be paid based on how much you owe, but she's stating a fact that will help her support her arguments.
6. The correct answer is number four, Yes, because she specifies several ways in which the act will end discrimination while preserving justified differences in pay.
She says, "Employers can still pay different workers different salaries based on factors like skill, performance, expertise, seniority, and so forth—the Paycheck Fairness Act doesn't touch any of that." She has numbered many reasons and shown data of the pay differences between genders. And she is now explaining that of course employers can and should pay their employees different wages based on certain factors that are justified but not because of gender.
It will provide an instant answer!