18.05.2022

constitution places limits on powers of those who govern

. 6

Faq

StudenGPT
Step-by-step answer
P Answered by Studen AI
The details from the text that make the connection between women’s lack of rights in the household and the effect on children are:

1. "I do believe that this mode of kidnapping—and it is frequent enough in all classes of society—will be by the next age viewed as it is by Heaven now." This refers to the unfair treatment of women in the society which often subject them to the pain of losing their children to their husbands. This can have a negative impact on the children as they are forcibly separated from their mothers.

2. "I have known these kinds of men to steal their children, whom they knew they had no means to maintain, take them into corrupt company, and to expose them to bodily danger, just to assert their power over their wives." This statement explicitly illustrates the negative impact on children due to their mother's inferior position in the society. The power-tussle between parents and lack of rights for women lead to children being thrown into inappropriate environments, thereby negatively affecting their well-being and growth.

Both statements effectively establish the correlation between the lack of rights for women in a family and the accompanying consequence on the children as they become victims of their mothers' oppressed position within the marital structure.
StudenGPT
Step-by-step answer
P Answered by Studen AI
Based on the passage, paragraph 8 suggests that Fuller believes that women are just as interested in public events and participation as men. The paragraph emphasizes that women, like men, seek opportunities for expansion and engagement outside of their domestic lives. Fuller argues that women are not content with solely fulfilling their roles in the home, and that they actively participate in social and public activities, such as attending religious festivals or engaging in charitable work. She rejects the notion that women should be confined to domesticity and highlights the importance of providing women with the same opportunities and freedoms as men to explore their interests and contribute to society. Therefore, the most accurate response is: "Fuller believes that women are just as interested in public events and participation as men."
StudenGPT
Step-by-step answer
P Answered by Studen AI
Paragraph 4 contributes to the development of Fuller's argument for equality for women by presenting the counterargument of men that has hindered the advancement of women's rights. In this paragraph, Fuller addresses the perspective of those who believe that women should not be involved in politics or public life. She mentions how some argue that women should focus on their role within the home and that allowing them to participate in government or leadership positions would violate their delicacy and destroy the beauty of home. Fuller acknowledges the opposition's concern about introducing women into public spheres and provides arguments to counter these viewpoints. This paragraph helps to strengthen Fuller's argument by recognizing the opposing views and offering persuasive rebuttals to promote equality for women.
StudenGPT
Step-by-step answer
P Answered by Studen AI
Question 1, Part A:
The key idea that Fuller develops in "Woman of the Nineteenth Century" is that men are denying women and enslaved people the unalienable rights they are born with.

Justification:
Throughout the text, Fuller highlights the oppression faced by women in society and argues that they should have the same rights and privileges as men. She criticizes the way women are oppressed by their husbands and the broader society. Fuller believes that men should do more to help women and enslaved people function independently and that society should adapt to the needs of its members. These ideas align with the concept of unalienable rights, which are inherent and cannot be taken away by others.

Question 2, Part B:
The detail from the text that contributes to the development of the key idea identified in Part A is:

"The gift of reason, Man's highest prerogative, is assigned to them in much lower degrees. There exists in the minds of men a similar tone of feeling toward women as toward enslaved persons, such as is expressed in the common phrase, 'Tell that to women and children.'"

Justification:
This detail showcases how women are viewed as inferior by men and draws a parallel between the treatment of women and enslaved persons. Both groups are not given the same respect and are often dismissed or not taken seriously. This detail supports the key idea that men are denying women and enslaved people their unalienable rights by highlighting the unequal treatment and disregard for their voices and intellect.
History
Step-by-step answer
P Answered by PhD
1. We can say that the first excerpt here is from the point of view of a Federalists who supported the ratification of the Constitution and the establishment of a stronger federal government. Publius was a pseudonym used be Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay which they used to write Federalist Papers whose main purpose was the to educate the public and gain support for the ratification of the Constitution. One of the main issues they address here is to reassure the people that with the checks and balances their freedom would be protected and the federal officials would work in their best interest.

2. The second excerpt here we can is from the point of view of an anti-federalists who opposed the ratification of the Constitution. Centinel was a pseudonym  of Samuel Bryan who opposed the ratification of the Constitution as he and his compatriots believed that a strong federal government would lead to a loss of freedom and the tyranny of the government. 

3. Shay's Rebellion is an excellent example that would support the the view of the Federalists and the need for a stronger federal government. Shay's Rebellion showed that the government outlined in the Articles of Confederation was ineffective as it could not put down the Rebellion as it lacked the authority to do so. So the need for a stronger federal government that could maintain peace and order was justified. 

4. I will start with the most significant event related to the African Americans in this period and that is the American Civil War (1861-1865). Before that most of the African American population were slaves and most of them were in the South as their economy depended on them. After the War and the gaining of freedom, the number of them left the south and that could explain the rise in population in other areas. But the overall decline in population by 1930s can be explained again by the ending of the slave trade. 

5. The other development that could explain these numbers is the passage of the Jim Crow laws in some states that were aimed at keeping the African Americans in subordinate position in relation to the Whites. Again South was leading in this kind of laws and it is no surprise that the number declined most dramatically. 

6. The importance of the time period is that it encompass the time from the beginning of African American's battle for freedom and against slavery, and the beginning of their ultimate battle against the discrimination. In 1850's the battle for freedom was brewing and in 1930s the battle against the Jim Crow laws and  for the eventual passage of the Equal Rights began.
History
Step-by-step answer
P Answered by PhD
1. We can say that the first excerpt here is from the point of view of a Federalists who supported the ratification of the Constitution and the establishment of a stronger federal government. Publius was a pseudonym used be Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay which they used to write Federalist Papers whose main purpose was the to educate the public and gain support for the ratification of the Constitution. One of the main issues they address here is to reassure the people that with the checks and balances their freedom would be protected and the federal officials would work in their best interest.

2. The second excerpt here we can is from the point of view of an anti-federalists who opposed the ratification of the Constitution. Centinel was a pseudonym  of Samuel Bryan who opposed the ratification of the Constitution as he and his compatriots believed that a strong federal government would lead to a loss of freedom and the tyranny of the government. 

3. Shay's Rebellion is an excellent example that would support the the view of the Federalists and the need for a stronger federal government. Shay's Rebellion showed that the government outlined in the Articles of Confederation was ineffective as it could not put down the Rebellion as it lacked the authority to do so. So the need for a stronger federal government that could maintain peace and order was justified. 

4. I will start with the most significant event related to the African Americans in this period and that is the American Civil War (1861-1865). Before that most of the African American population were slaves and most of them were in the South as their economy depended on them. After the War and the gaining of freedom, the number of them left the south and that could explain the rise in population in other areas. But the overall decline in population by 1930s can be explained again by the ending of the slave trade. 

5. The other development that could explain these numbers is the passage of the Jim Crow laws in some states that were aimed at keeping the African Americans in subordinate position in relation to the Whites. Again South was leading in this kind of laws and it is no surprise that the number declined most dramatically. 

6. The importance of the time period is that it encompass the time from the beginning of African American's battle for freedom and against slavery, and the beginning of their ultimate battle against the discrimination. In 1850's the battle for freedom was brewing and in 1930s the battle against the Jim Crow laws and  for the eventual passage of the Equal Rights began.
History
Step-by-step answer
P Answered by Specialist
1.       So the country could borrow in the future 2.       To support Americans business 3.       The democratic republic believed that the bank would help finance wars 4.       He halted all trade with Europe 5.       Claim that states had the right to determine the constitutionality of a law  6.       the purchase of the Louisiana territory 7.       It provided a buffer between the United States 

 

History
Step-by-step answer
P Answered by Specialist
1.       So the country could borrow in the future 2.       To support Americans business 3.       The democratic republic believed that the bank would help finance wars 4.       He halted all trade with Europe 5.       Claim that states had the right to determine the constitutionality of a law  6.       the purchase of the Louisiana territory 7.       It provided a buffer between the United States 

 

StudenGPT
Step-by-step answer
P Answered by Studen AI
In their inauguration speeches, both President George W. Bush and President Carter emphasize the importance of unity, trust, and the American dream. However, there are notable differences in their speeches as well.

President George W. Bush's second inauguration speech focuses on the theme of freedom, both within the United States and around the world. He highlights the need for the expansion of freedom in other countries as a way to ensure peace and security. President Bush argues that the survival of liberty in the United States depends on the success of liberty in other lands. He also emphasizes the values of self-government and the dignity and rights of every individual. President Bush's speech is forward-looking, presenting a vision of a world free from tyranny, hatred, and resentment. He states that it is the policy of the United States to seek and support the growth of democratic movements and institutions worldwide.

On the other hand, President Carter's inauguration speech focuses on the need for unity, trust, and moral duties within the United States. He acknowledges the challenges and mistakes of the past but calls for a renewed commitment to the basic principles of the nation. President Carter emphasizes the importance of maintaining faith in our country and in each other. He highlights the value of personal liberty, equality of opportunity, and human rights. President Carter also emphasizes the need for a competent and compassionate government, one that preserves national beauty, enhances human dignity, and protects the weak.

While both presidents address the importance of freedom, unity, and trust, they differ in their approaches and priorities. President Bush places a greater emphasis on the expansion of freedom abroad and the role of the United States in promoting democracy worldwide. President Carter, on the other hand, focuses more on the need for unity and trust among the American people and emphasizes the importance of moral duties, human rights, and equality of opportunity within the United States.

In summary, both President George W. Bush and President Carter highlight important values and aspirations in their inauguration speeches. While President Bush emphasizes the expansion of freedom globally, President Carter focuses on unity, trust, and moral duties within the United States.

Try asking the Studen AI a question.

It will provide an instant answer!

FREE