The correct answer to this open question is the following.Although you did not include any references or texts, we can comment on the following.My brief description would be this one.One major difference between Beard’s and Berkin’s historical interpretations of the drafting of the United States Constitution is the perspective from it was written. Each of the historians considered different points of view.Here is why.In the case of historian Charles Beard, he expressed in "An Economic Interpretation of the Constitution of the United States" (1913), that the framers of the US Constitution had economic interests as the priority when the document was drafted. They were so interested in protecting privacy rights and never compromise the economy of the people. On the other hand, in the case of historian Carol Berkin, she commented in "A Brilliant Solution: Inventing the American Constitution" (2002), that the founding fathers drafted the Constitution they focused on solving the many problems left by the English crown. They used their experience to protect the new country to protect it from a tyrant.
1. The major difference between Charles Beard's and Carol Berkin's interpretations of the drafting of the Constitution arises from the emphasis placed on the ideas that influenced the drafting of the Constitution.
Charles Beard stated that the drafting of the Constitution was to serve the economic interests of the wealthy. After all, only men of wealth were present at the Continental Congress or Constitution-drafting Convention.
On the other hand, Carol Berkin stated that the Constitution-drafting solved political problems that threatened the new nation. She noted that the first ten amendments aimed to crush oppositions of the Constitution.
2. The historical event that supported Beard's interpretation was the efforts to frustrate slaves from gaining freedom, a principle enshrined in the Constitution.
3. Similarly, Berkin's interpretation was supported by all the first ten amendments, including the Shay Rebellion that triggered the jettisoning of the Articles of Confederation and the drafting of the new Constitution.
Thus, the major interpretation difference between these two political historians lies in how they perceived the purposes of the Constitution.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Unfortunately, you did not include the two maps. Without them, we do not know your specific reference.
However, trying to help you and after doing some deep research, we can say the maps portray the Spanish, British, and Dutch trade maritime routes from 1750 to 1850. The other map shows the many trade routes in 2010 that practically crossed all over the world.
That is why we can answer that one significant reason for changes in the patterns of global economic interactions from circa 1750 to circa 2000, as illustrated by the two maps are the technology and modernization of means of transportation that today include land, air, and sea.
Trade has been the activity that has developed most rapidly all over the world in those years. Today, there are international organizations and free trade agreements that connect the world through trade.
More people on the planet started to require more products from all places and developed nations exploited natural resources and raw materials and produced more and better goods in their industrialized cities that were exported.
b. The development of diseases in the sixteenth century would support the arguments of the “new generation of historians in the second paragraph because the “new generation of historians” would look at this in relation to european imperialism and see the impact of the european diseases like smallpox that would plague places like modern day united states because of the european immunity, but lack of native immunity.
c. The “biological competition” contributed to the European imperialism in the Americas by creating a survival of the fittest environment where the europeans brought in diseases like smallpox that had plagued europe generations ago, but infected the native populations and weaken them in both their numbers and their strength, which enabled the Europeans to take control of the new world and develop a dominance while the natives were fighting a disease. This was “biological competition” because the Europeans' immunity was assisting them in fighting the natives' lack thereof.
In 1574, Akbar the emperor of the Subcontinent ordered his wazir to make a Katab-khana in the palace. This was to discover and reintroduce old texts. Books like Rajatarangini, Ramayana and Mahabharata were translated into different languages. One of these languages was Persian. After this many different old books both religious and non-religious were translated for the general public to read.
This was done to make different sects and religions stay united. His actions to a certain extent did eliminate disagreements between the people from different religions.
2.
Abu'l-Fazl ibn Mubarak was not the person behind Akbar's policies. It was actually his favorite wife named Mariam-uz-Zamani. She was a Hindu by birth. She was born at the house of Raja Bharmal of Amber. Later, when she grew up she was married to Akber. This marriage had political benefits. Jahangir was her son. She, however, did not play any political role in the Mughal court.
She became more eminent after her son succeeded the throne. She was one of the most famous female traders of that time. Akbar after his marriage started his own religion called Din-e-ilahi.
3.
Many cultural and intellectual changes took place because of this interaction. Collection of manuscripts from around the world and their critical study was introduced. Changes in the economic system i.e trade also took place.
Several changes in slavery were also seen.
During this period, the trade of slaves became very eminent and a major source of income for many
.Arabic art and literature started spreading in different South Asian regions.
While people from those regions introduced new ways of living and rituals etc to Muslims.
A) Ethnic divisions hindered the development of land-based empires in the period 1450-1750. For example, the Manchu people in the Qing Dynasty in China sought to preserve their ethnic values while ruling China, which proved to be an obstacle for them to rule the vast majority of Han Chinese.
B) Ethnic divisions also hindered the development of maritime empires in the period 1450-1750. For example, the ethnic division between the French colonists and the Haitian people led to multiple Haitian rebellions and ultimately the Haitian Revolution against France.
C) Many land-based empires and maritime empires institutionalized hierarchical distinctions amongst different ethnic groups, often with the use of slavery. The European colonists, for instance, made African Americans the lowest class in American society by enslaving them. Similarly, Christians under Ottoman rule are recruited as janissaries. In both examples, the ruling class adopted policies that limit the social mobility of the ethnic groups that are alien to themselves.
In general, because of his numerous achievements, Akbar was awarded the epithet "the Great." The majority of Akbar's achievements military-related.
Explanation:
One aspect in which Akbar's efforts in financing the translations stated in the text are comparable to rulers of other empires throughout the era 1450-1750 is that they both intended to improve their people's well-being by creating educational opportunities and religious books translations. During this time, Akbar and other monarchs aspired to translate sacred books in order to spread education, religion, and history. As well as to bring together Jewish, Hindu, and Muslim faiths in order to avoid future confrontations.
246
17 321
rating
Get help with homework
