Briefly explain how ONE specific historical event or development during the period 1786-1861 that is not explicitly mentioned in the excerpts could be used to support Holt’s interpretation.

a) ONE major difference between David M. Potter's and Michael F. Holt's historical interpretations of the Civil War is that Potter blamed the perennial sectional conflicts between the North and the South for the Civil War. He stated that the divergent views on the issue of slavery did not occasion the Civil War but the ingrained sectionalism.

On the other hand, Holt noted that the Civil War reflected a break from the American tradition of compromise, stating that the Civil War was not a normal phenomenon in the American political democratic process.

b) Potter's interpretation of the Civil War can be supported by this ONE specific historical event, the breakdown of the two-party system that pitted far-right democratic republicanism against center-right republicanism.  The far-right republicanism promoted white supremacy, while the center-right democratic republicanism tilted towards acceptance of black equality.

The white supremacists welcomed the Supreme Court's sanction of Jim Crow laws and practiced the separation of whites from blacks to high heavens. The center-right moderates sought the overturning of the separatism principle and practice.

c) The Civil War, according to Holt, is ONE specific historical event that proved that America broke with its tradition of compromise. The Great Compromise of 1787 ensured that America was not thrown into a civil war during the Constitution Convention with all the opposing views by Federalists and Anti-Federalists.

Thus, Potter's interpretation of the cause of the Civil War concentrated on ingrained divisive tendencies between the North and the South, while Holt's interpretation blamed the breakdown of the two-party system, which allowed democratic opposition.

Learn more: link

a) ONE major difference between David M. Potter's and Michael F. Holt's historical interpretations of the Civil War is that Potter blamed the perennial sectional conflicts between the North and the South for the Civil War. He stated that the divergent views on the issue of slavery did not occasion the Civil War but the ingrained sectionalism.

On the other hand, Holt noted that the Civil War reflected a break from the American tradition of compromise, stating that the Civil War was not a normal phenomenon in the American political democratic process.

b) Potter's interpretation of the Civil War can be supported by this ONE specific historical event, the breakdown of the two-party system that pitted far-right democratic republicanism against center-right republicanism.  The far-right republicanism promoted white supremacy, while the center-right democratic republicanism tilted towards acceptance of black equality.

The white supremacists welcomed the Supreme Court's sanction of Jim Crow laws and practiced the separation of whites from blacks to high heavens. The center-right moderates sought the overturning of the separatism principle and practice.

c) The Civil War, according to Holt, is ONE specific historical event that proved that America broke with its tradition of compromise. The Great Compromise of 1787 ensured that America was not thrown into a civil war during the Constitution Convention with all the opposing views by Federalists and Anti-Federalists.

Thus, Potter's interpretation of the cause of the Civil War concentrated on ingrained divisive tendencies between the North and the South, while Holt's interpretation blamed the breakdown of the two-party system, which allowed democratic opposition.

Learn more: link

The reason why is development from 1786-1861 might not effect  Potter’s interpretation.

Explanation:

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Unfortunately, you did not include the two maps. Without them, we do not know your specific reference.

However, trying to help you and after doing some deep research, we can say the maps portray the Spanish, British, and Dutch trade maritime routes from 1750 to 1850. The other map shows the many trade routes in 2010 that practically crossed all over the world.

That is why we can answer that one significant reason for changes in the patterns of global economic interactions from circa 1750 to circa 2000, as illustrated by the two maps are the technology and modernization of means of transportation that today include land, air, and sea.

Trade has been the activity that has developed most rapidly all over the world in those years. Today, there are international organizations and free trade agreements that connect the world through trade.

More people on the planet started to require more products from all places and developed nations exploited natural resources and raw materials and produced more and better goods in their industrialized cities that were exported.

1.

In 1574, Akbar the emperor of the Subcontinent ordered his wazir to make a Katab-khana in the palace. This was to discover and reintroduce old texts. Books like Rajatarangini, Ramayana and Mahabharata were translated into different languages. One of these languages was Persian. After this many different old books both religious and non-religious were translated for the general public to read.

This was done to make different sects and religions stay united. His actions to a certain extent did eliminate disagreements between the people from different religions.

2.

Abu'l-Fazl ibn Mubarak was not the person behind Akbar's policies. It was actually his favorite wife named Mariam-uz-Zamani. She was a Hindu by birth. She was born at the house of Raja Bharmal of Amber. Later, when she grew up she was married to Akber. This marriage had political benefits. Jahangir was her son. She, however, did not play any political role in the Mughal court.  

3.

A) Ethnic divisions hindered the development of land-based empires in the period 1450-1750. For example, the Manchu people in the Qing Dynasty in China sought to preserve their ethnic values while ruling China, which proved to be an obstacle for them to rule the vast majority of Han Chinese.

B) Ethnic divisions also hindered the development of maritime empires in the period 1450-1750. For example, the ethnic division between the French colonists and the Haitian people led to multiple Haitian rebellions and ultimately the Haitian Revolution against France.

C) Many land-based empires and maritime empires institutionalized hierarchical distinctions amongst different ethnic groups, often with the use of slavery. The European colonists, for instance, made African Americans the lowest class in American society by enslaving them. Similarly, Christians under Ottoman rule are recruited as janissaries. In both examples, the ruling class adopted policies that limit the social mobility of the ethnic groups that are alien to themselves.

In general, because of his numerous achievements, Akbar was awarded the epithet "the Great." The majority of Akbar's achievements military-related.         

Explanation:

For more information, refer to the link:

link