16.09.2022

How did strikes hurt unions' goals? list at least two arguments in opposition to the use of strikes.

. 23

Step-by-step answer

17.02.2022, solved by verified expert
Unlock the full answer
32 students found this answer . helpful

Strikes often grew violent.


Striking workers often lost their jobs.


Strikes were often opposed by the public.


Striking workers could be injured or killed.


Strikes did not always work.

It is was helpful?

Faq

History
Step-by-step answer
P Answered by PhD

Strikes often grew violent.


Striking workers often lost their jobs.


Strikes were often opposed by the public.


Striking workers could be injured or killed.


Strikes did not always work.

History
Step-by-step answer
P Answered by PhD

Union strikes are made by employees to air out their grievances to the company. Labor strikes benefit union goals because these goals will be heard by the management when taken to the streets. With media coverage, the union’s goals and company grievances will be revealed. Union strikes help management reevaluate salary rates and with negotiation and compromise, both management and employee can agree on a suitable and fair wage rates. There will reduced wage inequality. Incentive and benefits will also be negotiated by the union employees that will benefit the entire workforce.

History
Step-by-step answer
P Answered by PhD

Union strikes are made by employees to air out their grievances to the company. Labor strikes benefit union goals because these goals will be heard by the management when taken to the streets. With media coverage, the union’s goals and company grievances will be revealed. Union strikes help management reevaluate salary rates and with negotiation and compromise, both management and employee can agree on a suitable and fair wage rates. There will reduced wage inequality. Incentive and benefits will also be negotiated by the union employees that will benefit the entire workforce.

History
Step-by-step answer
P Answered by Master

Strikes enabled workers to ask for demands as a group.

Strikes could disrupt the national economy.

Strikes were successful in winning concessions for workers.

Strikes gave workers publicity.

Strikes cost the company money in lost productivity and security.

Explanation:

History
Step-by-step answer
P Answered by PhD
There were two benefits they wanted, better working conditions and higher wages. The strikes were a good thing because the government didn't want to help them get it. When the railroads were closed and the postal services were obstructed, the government had to intervene and help the workers because the country would not be able to work. The strikes benefited because eventually they did get it. If there hadn't been strikes, they would've probably been ignored for even longer by both the company owners and the government.
History
Step-by-step answer
P Answered by PhD

Strikes often grew violent.


Striking workers often lost their jobs.


Strikes were often opposed by the public.


Striking workers could be injured or killed.


Strikes did not always work.

History
Step-by-step answer
P Answered by Master

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Unfortunately, you did not include the two maps. Without them, we do not know your specific reference.

However, trying to help you and after doing some deep research, we can say the maps portray the Spanish, British, and Dutch trade maritime routes from 1750 to 1850. The other map shows the many trade routes in 2010 that practically crossed all over the world.

That is why we can answer that one significant reason for changes in the patterns of global economic interactions from circa 1750 to circa 2000, as illustrated by the two maps are the technology and modernization of means of transportation that today include land, air, and sea.

Trade has been the activity that has developed most rapidly all over the world in those years. Today, there are international organizations and free trade agreements that connect the world through trade.

More people on the planet started to require more products from all places and developed nations exploited natural resources and raw materials and produced more and better goods in their industrialized cities that were exported.

History
Step-by-step answer
P Answered by PhD
Convection currents in earths mantle are caused by the rise of hot material rising towards the crust, becoming cooler and sinking back down. 
History
Step-by-step answer
P Answered by PhD

see explanation and i got an a btw.

Explanation:

b. The development of diseases in the sixteenth century would support the arguments of the “new generation of historians in the second paragraph because the “new generation of historians” would look at this in relation to european imperialism and see the impact of the european diseases like smallpox that would plague places like modern day united states because of the european immunity, but lack of native immunity.  

c. The “biological competition” contributed to the European imperialism in the Americas by creating a survival of the fittest environment where the europeans brought in diseases like smallpox that had plagued europe generations ago, but infected the native populations and weaken them in both their numbers and their strength, which enabled the Europeans to take control of the new world and develop a dominance while the natives were fighting a disease. This was “biological competition” because the Europeans' immunity was assisting them in fighting the natives' lack thereof.  


B) Explain ONE development in the sixteenth century that would support the arguments of the new gen
History
Step-by-step answer
P Answered by PhD

1.

In 1574, Akbar the emperor of the Subcontinent ordered his wazir to make a Katab-khana in the palace. This was to discover and reintroduce old texts. Books like Rajatarangini, Ramayana and Mahabharata were translated into different languages. One of these languages was Persian. After this many different old books both religious and non-religious were translated for the general public to read.

This was done to make different sects and religions stay united. His actions to a certain extent did eliminate disagreements between the people from different religions.

2.

Abu'l-Fazl ibn Mubarak was not the person behind Akbar's policies. It was actually his favorite wife named Mariam-uz-Zamani. She was a Hindu by birth. She was born at the house of Raja Bharmal of Amber. Later, when she grew up she was married to Akber. This marriage had political benefits. Jahangir was her son. She, however, did not play any political role in the Mughal court.  

She became more eminent after her son succeeded the throne. She was one of the most famous female traders of that time. Akbar after his marriage started his own religion called Din-e-ilahi.

3.

Many cultural and intellectual changes took place because of this interaction.  Collection of manuscripts from around the world and their critical study was introduced.  Changes in the economic system i.e trade also took place. Several changes in slavery were also seen. During this period, the trade of slaves became very eminent and a major source of income for many .Arabic art and literature started spreading in different South Asian regions. While people from those regions introduced new ways of living and rituals etc to Muslims.

Try asking the Studen AI a question.

It will provide an instant answer!

FREE