The correct answer for the questions based on the image is:
a) they didn't use advanced weapons.
Explanation:
Egyptian soldiers didn't use full body armor because of two things. The first one was the climate would not favor them in a fight and the second one was that they didn't have access to strong metal resources to afford a good armor for the price. They also didn't only fight on foot. They had carts, but in the image, we are not watching them fight or driving carts. We see them marching. So, we have 0 arguments to find that answer correct. And finally, the weapons they carry are not advanced. So, we have enough evidence to find it correct.
The correct answer for the questions based on the image is:
a) they didn't use advanced weapons.
Explanation:
Egyptian soldiers didn't use full body armor because of two things. The first one was the climate would not favor them in a fight and the second one was that they didn't have access to strong metal resources to afford a good armor for the price. They also didn't only fight on foot. They had carts, but in the image, we are not watching them fight or driving carts. We see them marching. So, we have 0 arguments to find that answer correct. And finally, the weapons they carry are not advanced. So, we have enough evidence to find it correct.
The Egyptian government, however, has had a more proactive approach towards the preservation of relics from past in recent years. Now they want to transform ancient Marina into an open air museum for tourists. The idea is to attract foreign tourists who usually spend their winter holiday in Tunisia.
Explanation:
The Egyptian government, however, has had a more proactive approach towards the preservation of relics from past in recent years. Now they want to transform ancient Marina into an open air museum for tourists. The idea is to attract foreign tourists who usually spend their winter holiday in Tunisia.
Explanation:
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Both perspectives are right. assuming my role as a historian, I can say that both perspectives are correct because those were the different realities that slaves and priests lived during ancient Egyptian times.
For the unmedicated slave, the Egyptians were cruel and merciless people. Why? Because they exploited slaves. They treated slaves badly. They were seen as "tools" to work in the fields, in construction, and at the service of the owners.
Of course, priests had a totally different point of view because they belonged to a social class that was much respected in ancient Egypt. So elite classes treated them well. If they treated them in the right way, priests did not have anything to complain about. That is why they described the Egyptians as peaceful and deeply religious people.
So we can conclude that different realities equal different perceptions.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Both perspectives are right. assuming my role as a historian, I can say that both perspectives are correct because those were the different realities that slaves and priests lived during ancient Egyptian times.
For the unmedicated slave, the Egyptians were cruel and merciless people. Why? Because they exploited slaves. They treated slaves badly. They were seen as "tools" to work in the fields, in construction, and at the service of the owners.
Of course, priests had a totally different point of view because they belonged to a social class that was much respected in ancient Egypt. So elite classes treated them well. If they treated them in the right way, priests did not have anything to complain about. That is why they described the Egyptians as peaceful and deeply religious people.
So we can conclude that different realities equal different perceptions.
With the help of using limestones
It will provide an instant answer!