06.09.2022

Choose all of the terms that MOST refer to the creation of the modern state of Israel.

. 4

Faq

Social Studies
Step-by-step answer
P Answered by Specialist

Question 1:Bartering

Question 2:Command Economy

Question 4:Market

Question 5:Production Quota

Question 6:Traditional Economy

Question 7:Entrepreneurship

Question 8:Free Enterprise

Question 9:Subsistence

Question 10:Economic Continuum

Question 11:Mixed Economy

Question 12:Euros

Question 13:Domestic

Question 14:Eurozone

Question 15:Subsidization

Question 16:Euro

Question 17:European Union

Question 18:Maastricht Treaty

Question 19:Treaty of Libson

Question 20:Balkins

Social Studies
Step-by-step answer
P Answered by Master

Based on the answer choices listed:

1. Bartering

2.Command Economy

3.Economic system

4. Market

5.Production quota

6. traditional economy

7.entrepreneurship

8.free enterprise

9.subsistence

10. Economic continuum

11. mixed economy

12. brexit

13. domestic

14. Eurozone

15.subsidization

16. Euro

17. European Union

18.Maastrivht Treaty

19.Treaty of Lisbon

20.Balkins

Social Studies
Step-by-step answer
P Answered by Specialist

Based on the answer choices listed:

1. Bartering

2.Command Economy

3.Economic system

4. Market

5.Production quota

6. traditional economy

7.entrepreneurship

8.free enterprise

9.subsistence

10. Economic continuum

11. mixed economy

12. brexit

13. domestic

14. Eurozone

15.subsidization

16. Euro

17. European Union

18.Maastrivht Treaty

19.Treaty of Lisbon

20.Balkins

Social Studies
Step-by-step answer
P Answered by Specialist

Question 1:Bartering

Question 2:Command Economy

Question 4:Market

Question 5:Production Quota

Question 6:Traditional Economy

Question 7:Entrepreneurship

Question 8:Free Enterprise

Question 9:Subsistence

Question 10:Economic Continuum

Question 11:Mixed Economy

Question 12:Euros

Question 13:Domestic

Question 14:Eurozone

Question 15:Subsidization

Question 16:Euro

Question 17:European Union

Question 18:Maastricht Treaty

Question 19:Treaty of Libson

Question 20:Balkins

Social Studies
Step-by-step answer
P Answered by PhD

British Planters were affected by the formation of the 13 British Colonies because their farms became highly prolific, allowing the British economy to flourish from profiting off of taxation. New towns also grew since so many people would go to them in order to barter goods and services.

Poor European Immigrants were affected by the formation of the 13th British Colonies because many immigrants from England and Europe traveled to the British colonies in search of new opportunities. Especially those well off, since they hoped to claim new land. As far as those with little money, they were just hoping for work in order to eventually purchase land of their own.

Native Americans were affected by the formation of the 13th British Colonies because they lost their lands gradually to the cunning British. Furthermore, a lot of Native American tribes were killed from diseases the British brought with them to their land. When the Native Americans finally did something about all the conflict with the British, they did not have weapons remotely as powerful as the British did. So, by the mid 1700s, almost all of the Native American tribes were extinguished.

Kidnapped Africans were affected by the formation of the 14th British Colonies because the British would kidnap them and sell them as servants as if though they were worthless and property. Eventually, laws in the North were set to free blacks. In the south, though, since the economy was so dependent on Africans, no Africans were freed.

Explanation:

I hope this helps!! :)))

Social Studies
Step-by-step answer
P Answered by PhD

British Planters were affected by the formation of the 13 British Colonies because their farms became highly prolific, allowing the British economy to flourish from profiting off of taxation. New towns also grew since so many people would go to them in order to barter goods and services.

Poor European Immigrants were affected by the formation of the 13th British Colonies because many immigrants from England and Europe traveled to the British colonies in search of new opportunities. Especially those well off, since they hoped to claim new land. As far as those with little money, they were just hoping for work in order to eventually purchase land of their own.

Native Americans were affected by the formation of the 13th British Colonies because they lost their lands gradually to the cunning British. Furthermore, a lot of Native American tribes were killed from diseases the British brought with them to their land. When the Native Americans finally did something about all the conflict with the British, they did not have weapons remotely as powerful as the British did. So, by the mid 1700s, almost all of the Native American tribes were extinguished.

Kidnapped Africans were affected by the formation of the 14th British Colonies because the British would kidnap them and sell them as servants as if though they were worthless and property. Eventually, laws in the North were set to free blacks. In the south, though, since the economy was so dependent on Africans, no Africans were freed.

Explanation:

I hope this helps!! :)))

StudenGPT
Step-by-step answer
P Answered by Studen AI
The author's purpose for writing this text appears to be B: to shed light on an important environmental moment in America's history.

Throughout the text, the author discusses the historical context and effects of the Raker Act and the controversy surrounding the damming of the Hetch Hetchy Valley. It goes into detail about the opposing perspectives on the issue, emphasizing the importance this event played in shaping the national park idea and influencing future environmental activism.

While the other options do touch on topics the author mentions, they're not the central focus of the text.

Option A suggests the text's purpose is illustrating arguments about water usage in major cities. However, while the text does describe the early 20th-century argument between San Francisco's needs for water and the concept of national parks, this isn't the overarching theme of the text.

Option C proposes that the text aims to detail the long-term impact of the 1906 San Francisco earthquake. While the earthquake is mentioned as a factor that added to San Francisco's push for a reliable water source, it is not the primary focus of the text.

Finally, option D posits that the purpose is to explain how John Muir was opposed to developing land on a national park. Although John Muir's opposition is indeed featured prominently in the text, the entire text doesn't revolve around explaining his opposition only.

Instead, the author's focus seems to be on giving a broad overview of an important event in America's environmental history - the damming of Hetch Hetchy Valley, the related Raker Act, and the nationwide debate it sparked which eventually played a critical role in refining the idea of national parks.
StudenGPT
Step-by-step answer
P Answered by Studen AI
The text discusses the concepts of conservation and preservation, and provides examples of how human actions can help preserve and conserve natural resources. Here are the main points of the text:

1. Conservation and Preservation:
- Conservation refers to the wise use of resources and is aimed at preventing resource depletion or extinction.
- It involves controlled and monitored activities, like hunting, based on ecological knowledge.
- Conservation areas often offer recreational opportunities such as hunting and fishing.
- Preservation refers to the protection of resources, particularly endangered species or habitats.
- Wildlife preserves are areas with limited human presence and are monitored to ensure protection.

2. Organizations involved in Conservation and Preservation:
- The World Wildlife Fund is a global organization dedicated to preserving Earth's biological diversity and monitoring pollution and wasteful consumption.
- The Canadian Wildlife Fund advocates for the protection of wild species and places in Canada.
- Manitoba Conservation is a provincial department that enforces hunting laws, funds research projects, protects non-game species, and educates the public.

3. Habitat Preservation:
- Habitat refers to the specific area where an organism lives and depends on for survival.
- Destruction or disruption of habitats is a major threat to species survival.
- Tropical ecosystems are particularly at risk due to land clearance for agriculture, leading to soil erosion and habitat destruction.
- Grassland ecosystems in North America were transformed for agriculture, resulting in the loss of native species.
- Polar habitats are also affected by rising global temperatures, leading to a decrease in ice floes and impacting species like polar bears.

4. Importance of Habitat Preservation:
- Habitat preservation aims to protect critical areas necessary for species survival.
- Preserving habitats helps protect the existence of species and maintains the beauty of natural ecosystems.
- Disruption in one organism's habitat can have ripple effects through food chains and ecosystems.

Overall, the text emphasizes the importance of conservation and preservation efforts to protect natural resources, ecosystems, and biodiversity. It highlights the need to understand the impact of human actions on habitats and the potential consequences for various species. By preserving habitats, we can ensure the long-term survival of many wild species and maintain the balance of ecosystems.
History
Step-by-step answer
P Answered by PhD

im not really good with debates but i like ta argue so ill try

hope this helped :)

Explanation:

Loyalist or Patriot

Various events of the 1700s led colonists to develop strong beliefs regarding the British government. The Trial of Peter Zenger, The Proclamation of 1763, the Boston Massacre combined with constantly changing taxes and rules that governed them made many think that self-governance was the best path for the colonies. Others felt that the King and his appointed officials had their best interests in mind and preferred to stay loyal to the crown. Later, during the American Revolution, most colonists took one side or the other. Either they were Patriots or loyalist. Patriots believed that the colonies should break away from England and govern themselves. Loyalist believed that the colonies.  Other famous loyalists include Thomas Hutchinson (governor of Massachusetts colony), Andrew Allen, John Butler (leader of the loyalists troops Butler 's Rangers), and David Mathews (mayor of New York City).  What happened to loyalists during the war?  

Life for the loyalists became increasingly difficult during the war. Loyalists who lived in areas controlled by the patriots were in constant danger from radical patriots. Many of them lost their homes and businesses.  

Many loyalists left the country and went back to Britain. Others decided to help the British fight the patriots. They either joined the British army or formed their own groups of fighters such as the Loyal Greens and the Royal American Regiment.  

What happened to the loyalists after the war?  

Many loyalists moved to England after the war ended. A lot of them lost their fortunes and land that they had built up over years in the Americas. In some cases the British government paid them for their loyalty, but it was usually not nearly as much as they had lost. The United States government wanted the loyalists to stay. They felt the new country could use their skills and education. Few stayed, however.

In early America, there were three factions that developed within the colonies- Loyalists, Patriots, and fence-sitters (neutral). This melting pot of different ideas, goals, and outlooks is what made pre-Revolutionary War America so volatile. These three factions seem easy to identify, Patriots wanted freedom from the crown all together, Loyalists want to stay British, and fence-sitters want to stay out of the political battle all together. However, it goes much farther than that, many different backgrounds and goals drove these people forward. Many did not take up the title of Loyalist or Patriot unless the struggles affected them directly, many more only took sides when it was profitably to.

Not because they believed in their cause but it was a way to save their financial wealth.

History
Step-by-step answer
P Answered by PhD

im not really good with debates but i like ta argue so ill try

hope this helped :)

Explanation:

Loyalist or Patriot

Various events of the 1700s led colonists to develop strong beliefs regarding the British government. The Trial of Peter Zenger, The Proclamation of 1763, the Boston Massacre combined with constantly changing taxes and rules that governed them made many think that self-governance was the best path for the colonies. Others felt that the King and his appointed officials had their best interests in mind and preferred to stay loyal to the crown. Later, during the American Revolution, most colonists took one side or the other. Either they were Patriots or loyalist. Patriots believed that the colonies should break away from England and govern themselves. Loyalist believed that the colonies.  Other famous loyalists include Thomas Hutchinson (governor of Massachusetts colony), Andrew Allen, John Butler (leader of the loyalists troops Butler 's Rangers), and David Mathews (mayor of New York City).  What happened to loyalists during the war?  

Life for the loyalists became increasingly difficult during the war. Loyalists who lived in areas controlled by the patriots were in constant danger from radical patriots. Many of them lost their homes and businesses.  

Many loyalists left the country and went back to Britain. Others decided to help the British fight the patriots. They either joined the British army or formed their own groups of fighters such as the Loyal Greens and the Royal American Regiment.  

What happened to the loyalists after the war?  

Many loyalists moved to England after the war ended. A lot of them lost their fortunes and land that they had built up over years in the Americas. In some cases the British government paid them for their loyalty, but it was usually not nearly as much as they had lost. The United States government wanted the loyalists to stay. They felt the new country could use their skills and education. Few stayed, however.

In early America, there were three factions that developed within the colonies- Loyalists, Patriots, and fence-sitters (neutral). This melting pot of different ideas, goals, and outlooks is what made pre-Revolutionary War America so volatile. These three factions seem easy to identify, Patriots wanted freedom from the crown all together, Loyalists want to stay British, and fence-sitters want to stay out of the political battle all together. However, it goes much farther than that, many different backgrounds and goals drove these people forward. Many did not take up the title of Loyalist or Patriot unless the struggles affected them directly, many more only took sides when it was profitably to.

Not because they believed in their cause but it was a way to save their financial wealth.

Try asking the Studen AI a question.

It will provide an instant answer!

FREE