What is the unit for Warren's data?

Calvin Coolidge

Explanation: Calvin Coolidge (1872-1933), the 30th U.S. president, led the nation through most of the Roaring Twenties, a decade of dynamic social and cultural change, materialism and excess. He took office on August 3, 1923, following the sudden death of President Warren G. Harding (1865-1923), whose administration was riddled with scandal. Nicknamed “Silent Cal” for his quiet, steadfast and frugal nature, Coolidge, a former Republican governor of Massachusetts, cleaned up the rampant corruption of the Harding administration and provided a model of stability and respectability for the American people in an era of fast-paced modernization. He was a pro-business conservative who favored tax cuts and limited government spending. Yet some of his laissez-faire policies also contributed to the economic problems that erupted into the Great Depression.

Calvin Coolidge

Explanation: Calvin Coolidge (1872-1933), the 30th U.S. president, led the nation through most of the Roaring Twenties, a decade of dynamic social and cultural change, materialism and excess. He took office on August 3, 1923, following the sudden death of President Warren G. Harding (1865-1923), whose administration was riddled with scandal. Nicknamed “Silent Cal” for his quiet, steadfast and frugal nature, Coolidge, a former Republican governor of Massachusetts, cleaned up the rampant corruption of the Harding administration and provided a model of stability and respectability for the American people in an era of fast-paced modernization. He was a pro-business conservative who favored tax cuts and limited government spending. Yet some of his laissez-faire policies also contributed to the economic problems that erupted into the Great Depression.

Warren explains the students’ position, then describes how it has been previously handled by the courts.

Explanation:

I could not find the passage that is missing in your question but I have found the correct answer which is answer A) and a little bit of explanation of it.

Answer: C) logical evidence because Warren is drawing a reasonable conclusion that segregating children is psychologically harmful.

Explanation:
According to the given question, we are asked to show the type of evidence which was used by Justice Warren in making his argument from the text.
As a result of this, we can come to an accurate conclusion that Justice Warren makes use of logical evidence because of the fact that he shows a claim, and supporting details to back up his premise that segregation of children was psychologically harmful.
Therefore, the correct answer is option C.

The answer is "C" logical evidence.  She did not provide statistics, nor did she tell personal stories or historical evidence, as in A,B, or D..

Logical evidence, because Warren is drawing a reasonable conclusion that segregating children is psychologically harmful.

Explanation:

Logical evidence is when someone presents a reasonable sound argument on his claim. This conclusion is a result of serious research, taking facts into account, and even providing ample evidence to support the claim made.

In the given passage from the court ruling of Brown vs. Board of Education, Justice Warren provides logical evidence to support the claim that segregation of students based on their race not only leads to the assumption that blacks are inferior but also led to a detrimental effect on the students by making them think they are inferior. Justice Warren opines that "To separate them from others of similar age and qualifications solely because of their race generates a feeling of inferiority as to their status in the community that may affect their hearts and minds in a way unlikely ever to be undone", supporting the claim that segregation of students is more harmful than effective for everyone involved.  

Thus, the correct answer is logical evidence.

The correct answer is the third option. In the excerpt from "Why Equal Pay Is Worth Fighting For" by Senator Elizabeth Warren, she supports her point by noting: "For middle-class families today, it usually takes two incomes to get by.” Warren supported Barbara Mikulski’s the Paycheck Fairness Act to combat wage discrimination, as it would help to ensure “that salary differences have something to do with the actual job that they are doing, and not just because they are women”.

The answer is "C" logical evidence.  She did not provide statistics, nor did she tell personal stories or historical evidence, as in A,B, or D..

3. The correct answer is Yes, because the Paycheck Fairness Act is a legal measure needed to close the wage gap between men and women.

The Paycheck Fairness Act is a labor law that adds more protections to the former, old Equal Pay Act of 1963. And it is a law to combat the gender pay gap in the U.S. So, the second answer is the correct one because it explains exactly what the law is and shows evidence to Warren's argument. The first option is wrong because it is not designed to open up more job opportunities, it's only about the salary gap between genders.

5. The correct answer is number one, People should receive equal pay for equal work.

Warren says, "It would help ensure that salary differences have something to do with the actual job that they are doing, and not just because they are women." Therefore, equal pay, equal work is the correct choice here. The other options are just pieces of what Warren said but twisted. For example, she also says "The effects of this discrimination are real, and they are long lasting. Today, more young women go to college than men, but unequal pay makes it harder for them to pay back student loans." But she is not saying that wages should be paid based on how much you owe, but she's stating a fact that will help her support her arguments.

6. The correct answer is number four, Yes, because she specifies several ways in which the act will end discrimination while preserving justified differences in pay.

She says, "Employers can still pay different workers different salaries based on factors like skill, performance, expertise, seniority, and so forth—the Paycheck Fairness Act doesn't touch any of that." She has numbered many reasons and shown data of the pay differences between genders. And she is now explaining that of course employers can and should pay their employees different wages based on certain factors that are justified but not because of gender.

Logical evidence, because Warren is drawing a reasonable conclusion that segregating children is psychologically harmful.

Explanation:

Logical evidence is when someone presents a reasonable sound argument on his claim. This conclusion is a result of serious research, taking facts into account, and even providing ample evidence to support the claim made.

In the given passage from the court ruling of Brown vs. Board of Education, Justice Warren provides logical evidence to support the claim that segregation of students based on their race not only leads to the assumption that blacks are inferior but also led to a detrimental effect on the students by making them think they are inferior. Justice Warren opines that "To separate them from others of similar age and qualifications solely because of their race generates a feeling of inferiority as to their status in the community that may affect their hearts and minds in a way unlikely ever to be undone", supporting the claim that segregation of students is more harmful than effective for everyone involved.  

Thus, the correct answer is logical evidence.