Answer:
see below:Step-by-step explanation:
1) To create the graphs for each set of data, I first organized the data into tables for each state, with the years in the left-hand column and the corresponding population values in the right-hand column. For each state, I created a line graph to visualize the trend in population over time. Additionally, I created a bar graph to show the population change for each decade, as well as a scatter plot to show the relationship between the year and the population. Overall, I noticed that all three states had a positive trend in population growth, with California having the largest population and fastest growth rate, followed by Texas and then New York. Texas and California both showed a significant increase in population growth in the latter half of the 20th century, while New York's growth rate slowed down during the same period.
2)
Based on the graphs, it appears that a linear model would best represent the population growth of New York, as the trend seems to be fairly consistent over time. For Texas, the data seems to follow a quadratic pattern, as there is a slight curve to the trend. Finally, the population growth of California appears to follow an exponential pattern, as the growth rate increases over time.
3)
To determine the average rate of change for each set of data from 1910 to 2020, I first calculated the difference in population between 1910 and 2020, then divided that number by the number of years elapsed (110 years) to find the average rate of change per year. The average rate of change for New York was 0.77%, for Texas it was 2.57%, and for California, it was 2.77%. This means that both Texas and California have higher growth rates than New York, which will likely result in a larger allocation of government funds to these states in the future.
4)
To determine an exponential model for the states with the two fastest growth rates (California and Texas), I used the formula y = ab^x, where y represents the population, x represents the number of years since 1910, a represents the initial population (the y-intercept, which is equal to the population in 1910), and b represents the growth rate (the base of the exponential function). Using this formula, I found that the exponential model for California is y = 2.06 x 10^6 * 1.019^(x), and for Texas, it is y = 3.89 x 10^6 * 1.019^(x).
5)
To predict the populations for California and Texas in 2030 (x = 120), I plugged x = 120 into the exponential models and solved for y. For California, the predicted population in 2030 is 48.4 million, and for Texas, it is 42.8 million. These predictions seem reasonable based on the population growth trends seen in the graphs and the exponential models. However, it's important to note that these predictions are based on past growth rates and may be impacted by a variety of factors, such as changes in government policy or unforeseen events like natural disasters.