The Population and Housing Census takes place every ten years and is designed to count every resident in the United States. The data collected by the census determine the number of seats assigned to each state in the U.S. House of Representatives and the amount of federal funds provided to local communities. In addition, census data guide infrastructure improvements as well as where and when to build schools and hospitals.
You are tasked with analyzing census data for three states.Based on the data, answer the following questions in a separate word document, which you will upload to Canvas. Note: You will not receive any credit for answers without explanations. Please provide a paragraph that explains your methods and all of your work for each item listed below.
1. Create three different graphs for each set of data. (Nine graphs total). You may use a bar graph or a scatterplot. What do you notice about the data? Compare and contrast the sets of data.
2. Which model would best represent each set of data: linear, quadratic, or exponential? Explain your reasoning based on your graphs.
3. Determine the average rate of change for each set of data from 1910 to 2020. What do you notice? Compare and contrast the growth rates for the states. How do you think these growth rates will impact government allocations for each state?
4. Determine an exponential model for the states with the two fastest growth rates. Explain your work. Note: The y-intercept equals the value provided for 1910. Thus, for the year.
1910, x = 0.
5. Use your exponential models to predict the populations for these two states for the year
2030 (x = 120, the number of years since 1910). Explain your work. Do your predictions
seem reasonable? Explain your reasoning.

. 0

Step-by-step answer

09.03.2023, solved by verified expert
Unlock the full answer
1 students found this answer . helpful

Answer:

see below:

Step-by-step explanation:

1) To create the graphs for each set of data, I first organized the data into tables for each state, with the years in the left-hand column and the corresponding population values in the right-hand column. For each state, I created a line graph to visualize the trend in population over time. Additionally, I created a bar graph to show the population change for each decade, as well as a scatter plot to show the relationship between the year and the population. Overall, I noticed that all three states had a positive trend in population growth, with California having the largest population and fastest growth rate, followed by Texas and then New York. Texas and California both showed a significant increase in population growth in the latter half of the 20th century, while New York's growth rate slowed down during the same period.

2)

Based on the graphs, it appears that a linear model would best represent the population growth of New York, as the trend seems to be fairly consistent over time. For Texas, the data seems to follow a quadratic pattern, as there is a slight curve to the trend. Finally, the population growth of California appears to follow an exponential pattern, as the growth rate increases over time.

3)

To determine the average rate of change for each set of data from 1910 to 2020, I first calculated the difference in population between 1910 and 2020, then divided that number by the number of years elapsed (110 years) to find the average rate of change per year. The average rate of change for New York was 0.77%, for Texas it was 2.57%, and for California, it was 2.77%. This means that both Texas and California have higher growth rates than New York, which will likely result in a larger allocation of government funds to these states in the future.

4)

To determine an exponential model for the states with the two fastest growth rates (California and Texas), I used the formula y = ab^x, where y represents the population, x represents the number of years since 1910, a represents the initial population (the y-intercept, which is equal to the population in 1910), and b represents the growth rate (the base of the exponential function). Using this formula, I found that the exponential model for California is y = 2.06 x 10^6 * 1.019^(x), and for Texas, it is y = 3.89 x 10^6 * 1.019^(x).

5)

To predict the populations for California and Texas in 2030 (x = 120), I plugged x = 120 into the exponential models and solved for y. For California, the predicted population in 2030 is 48.4 million, and for Texas, it is 42.8 million. These predictions seem reasonable based on the population growth trends seen in the graphs and the exponential models. However, it's important to note that these predictions are based on past growth rates and may be impacted by a variety of factors, such as changes in government policy or unforeseen events like natural disasters.

It is was helpful?

Faq

Mathematics
Step-by-step answer
P Answered by PhD
Answer: 440 grams for 1.54 is the better value
Explanation:
Take the price and divide by the number of grams
1.54 / 440 =0.0035 per gram
1.26 / 340 =0.003705882 per gram
0.0035 per gram < 0.003705882 per gram
Mathematics
Step-by-step answer
P Answered by PhD

The answer is in the image 

The answer is in the image 
Mathematics
Step-by-step answer
P Answered by PhD

For every 8 cars there are 7 trucks

Therefore,

Cars:Truck=8:7

Answer is B)8:7

Mathematics
Step-by-step answer
P Answered by PhD

The solution is in the following image

The solution is in the following image
Mathematics
Step-by-step answer
P Answered by PhD

y=2x+15

where y=Value of coin

x=Age in years

Value of coin after 19 years=2*19+15

=$53

Therefore, Value after 19 years=$53

Mathematics
Step-by-step answer
P Answered by PhD
The answer is in the image 

The answer is in the image 

Mathematics
Step-by-step answer
P Answered by PhD

The answer is in the image 

The answer is in the image 
Mathematics
Step-by-step answer
P Answered by PhD

Salesperson will make 6% of 1800

=(6/100)*1800

=108

Salesperson will make $108 in $1800 sales

Try asking the Studen AI a question.

It will provide an instant answer!

FREE