28.11.2020

How do you use descriptive property to solve 48÷3

. 0

Step-by-step answer

30.05.2023, solved by verified expert

Faq

Mathematics
Step-by-step answer
P Answered by PhD

16

Step-by-step explanation:

48/3=16

StudenGPT
Step-by-step answer
P Answered by Studen AI
The part of the survey that Jill is completing is using the order property. In this case, Jill is asked to rank the options from the most important to the least important consideration she has when getting her hair cut. This indicates that the survey is focusing on the order or ranking of the options.

The order property is commonly used in surveys or questionnaires when participants are asked to prioritize or rank their preferences. By assigning a specific order to the options, it allows for a clear understanding of the relative importance of each item.

In Jill's case, she is asked to rank the following considerations: price, look of the salon, easy appointments, parking, and hair cutters. She needs to arrange them in the order of importance to her, from the most important consideration to the least important consideration.

By using the order property in a survey, it helps the surveyor to gain insights into the preferences and priorities of the participants, which can be useful for decision-making or understanding customer preferences in the context of the hair salon survey.
StudenGPT
Step-by-step answer
P Answered by Studen AI
Based on the given information, Marco is asked to answer a series of survey questions. The first question asks him to score the statement: "Panda's Pizza is the best in the city" on a scale from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). The second question asks him about the amount of money he typically spends each week on takeout food.

The statement "Panda's Pizza is the best in the city" is a subjective opinion, as different people may have different preferences or experiences with pizza. There is no objective measure to determine the best pizza in the city. Therefore, the first question is an example of a subjective or opinion-based question.

The second question asks about the amount of money Marco typically spends each week on takeout food. This is an example of a descriptive question as it gathers information about Marco's personal behavior or habits. The answer to this question can vary from person to person, depending on their spending habits and financial situation.

Based on the given responses, we have "False, False, True." Without further context, it is unclear which responses correspond to which questions. It would be helpful to have the responses explicitly labeled for each question to determine which statement they apply to.

In summary, the first question is an example of a subjective or opinion-based question, while the second question is a descriptive question about personal spending habits. However, without proper alignment of responses to their corresponding questions, it is challenging to provide a definitive interpretation of the given responses.
Mathematics
Step-by-step answer
P Answered by Master

With regard to intelligence scores, at 95% confidence level, there is significant evidence to conclude that violent offenders are less intelligent than property offenders

Step-by-step explanation:

H_a: Violent offenders are less intelligent than property offenders

H_o: Violent offenders and property offenders do not differ significantly with regard to intelligence scores

Test statistic can be found using the formula

z=\frac{X-Y}{\sqrt{\frac{s(x)^2}{N(x)}+\frac{s(y)^2}{N(y)}}} where

X is the mean IQ score of property offenders (96)Y is the mean IQ score of violent offenders (88)s(x) is the sample standard deviation of property offenders (8.5)s(y) is the sample standard deviation of violent offenders (7.5)N(x) is the sample size for property offenders (225)N(y) is the sample size for violent offenders (200)

then z=\frac{96-88}{\sqrt{\frac{8.5^2}{225}+\frac{7.5^2}{200}}} ≈10.3

One tail p-value of the test statistic is < 0.00001

Since  p-value<0.05 (significance level) we reject the null hypothesis.

Mathematics
Step-by-step answer
P Answered by Specialist

With regard to intelligence scores, at 95% confidence level, there is significant evidence to conclude that violent offenders are less intelligent than property offenders

Step-by-step explanation:

H_a: Violent offenders are less intelligent than property offenders

H_o: Violent offenders and property offenders do not differ significantly with regard to intelligence scores

Test statistic can be found using the formula

z=\frac{X-Y}{\sqrt{\frac{s(x)^2}{N(x)}+\frac{s(y)^2}{N(y)}}} where

X is the mean IQ score of property offenders (96)Y is the mean IQ score of violent offenders (88)s(x) is the sample standard deviation of property offenders (8.5)s(y) is the sample standard deviation of violent offenders (7.5)N(x) is the sample size for property offenders (225)N(y) is the sample size for violent offenders (200)

then z=\frac{96-88}{\sqrt{\frac{8.5^2}{225}+\frac{7.5^2}{200}}} ≈10.3

One tail p-value of the test statistic is < 0.00001

Since  p-value<0.05 (significance level) we reject the null hypothesis.

Business
Step-by-step answer
P Answered by PhD

Westbank Real Estate, Inc. and Hardell Lumber Co.

2. Does the electronic agreement for the sale of trees and soil fall under the statute of frauds? (YES / NO)

3. Under which category? (CONTRACTS INVOLVING LAND/ CONTRACTS THAT BY THEIR TERMS CANNOT BE PERFORMED IN LESS THAN A YEAR AFTER THE DATE OF AGREEMENT/ A PROMISE TO ANSWER FOR A DEBT OF ANOTHER/ A PROMISE MADE IN CONSIDERATION OF MARRIAGE/ CONTRACTS FOR THE SALE OF GOODS OVER $500)

4. An electronic memorandum (DOES/ DOES NOT) satisfy the writing requirements for the Statute of Frauds.

5. Land is considered to be (REAL PROPERTY/ PERSONAL PROPERTY)

6. The definition of land includes (NO/ SOME/ ALL) physical objects that are permanently attached to the property.

7. Examples of physical objects that constitute land for purposes of the statute of frauds include (BUILDINGS/ FENCES/ TREES/ SOIL/ ALL OF THESE)

8. A written or electronic memorandum evidencing a contract will suffice provided that the writing is signed by (THE PERSON WHO IS ENFORCING THE CONTRACT/ THE PERSON AGAINST WHOM THE CONTRACT IS BEING ENFORCED)

9. Who signed the emails? (WESTBANK REAL ESTATE/ HARDELL LUMBER/ BOTH PARTIES)

10. What type of signature must be on an email in order to enforce an electronic record? (A TYPED NAME/ AN OFFICIAL SIGNATURE/ A NOTARIZED SIGNATURE/ AN ENCRYPTED SIGNATURE)

11. Does the electronic memorandum have the parties' typed names? (YES/ NO)

12. Does the electronic memorandum describe the property involved?(YES/ NO)

13. Is it likely a court would find that the electronic memorandum satisfied the statute of frauds? (YES/ NO)

14. As a result, Hardell (WILL/ WILL NOT) likely be able to enforce the contract against Westbank.

Explanation:

The memoranda exchanged between Westbank Real Estate and Hardell Lumber Co provides the evidence of their oral contract. The statute of fraud covers most oral contracts, especially those involving real property or sale of land.  It is important to note that land includes all its permanent attachments.

Business
Step-by-step answer
P Answered by PhD

Westbank Real Estate, Inc. and Hardell Lumber Co.

2. Does the electronic agreement for the sale of trees and soil fall under the statute of frauds? (YES / NO)

3. Under which category? (CONTRACTS INVOLVING LAND/ CONTRACTS THAT BY THEIR TERMS CANNOT BE PERFORMED IN LESS THAN A YEAR AFTER THE DATE OF AGREEMENT/ A PROMISE TO ANSWER FOR A DEBT OF ANOTHER/ A PROMISE MADE IN CONSIDERATION OF MARRIAGE/ CONTRACTS FOR THE SALE OF GOODS OVER $500)

4. An electronic memorandum (DOES/ DOES NOT) satisfy the writing requirements for the Statute of Frauds.

5. Land is considered to be (REAL PROPERTY/ PERSONAL PROPERTY)

6. The definition of land includes (NO/ SOME/ ALL) physical objects that are permanently attached to the property.

7. Examples of physical objects that constitute land for purposes of the statute of frauds include (BUILDINGS/ FENCES/ TREES/ SOIL/ ALL OF THESE)

8. A written or electronic memorandum evidencing a contract will suffice provided that the writing is signed by (THE PERSON WHO IS ENFORCING THE CONTRACT/ THE PERSON AGAINST WHOM THE CONTRACT IS BEING ENFORCED)

9. Who signed the emails? (WESTBANK REAL ESTATE/ HARDELL LUMBER/ BOTH PARTIES)

10. What type of signature must be on an email in order to enforce an electronic record? (A TYPED NAME/ AN OFFICIAL SIGNATURE/ A NOTARIZED SIGNATURE/ AN ENCRYPTED SIGNATURE)

11. Does the electronic memorandum have the parties' typed names? (YES/ NO)

12. Does the electronic memorandum describe the property involved?(YES/ NO)

13. Is it likely a court would find that the electronic memorandum satisfied the statute of frauds? (YES/ NO)

14. As a result, Hardell (WILL/ WILL NOT) likely be able to enforce the contract against Westbank.

Explanation:

The memoranda exchanged between Westbank Real Estate and Hardell Lumber Co provides the evidence of their oral contract. The statute of fraud covers most oral contracts, especially those involving real property or sale of land.  It is important to note that land includes all its permanent attachments.

English
Step-by-step answer
P Answered by PhD
1) The answer would be B) Anglo-Saxon women had similar power;  they retained control over their property after marriage.

2) The answer would be C) Presenting the reader with vivid images that bring a story or situation to life.

3) The answer would be B) Epic poems such as ''Beowulf'' gave Anglo-Saxons a sense of their identity.
English
Step-by-step answer
P Answered by PhD
1) The answer would be B) Anglo-Saxon women had similar power;  they retained control over their property after marriage.

2) The answer would be C) Presenting the reader with vivid images that bring a story or situation to life.

3) The answer would be B) Epic poems such as ''Beowulf'' gave Anglo-Saxons a sense of their identity.
Social Studies
Step-by-step answer
P Answered by PhD

1.) deeds ; 2.) warranty ; 3.) Clearly ; 4.) General ; 5.) metes and bounds ; clearly not ; 6.) did ; 7) metes and bounds ; do not ; 8.) Prescott

Explanation:

In summary, the general description of 1973 did show the disputed acre of land, however, the metes and bound description which shows the land boundary does not include the acre in question. Since the metes and bounds will overrule the general description in this scenario, then the Barriers do not own the land and Ratner it belongs to the Prescott's.

Try asking the Studen AI a question.

It will provide an instant answer!

FREE