English : asked on dshood6599
 31.10.2021

Write an essay in which you critique and evaluate how the author of “Tipping System Exacerbates Unfair Pay at Restaurants” builds an argument to convince her audience that restaurant workers deserve fair wages from their employers instead of tips. In your essay, explain and evaluate how Kathleen Kingsbury uses the rhetorical appeals, ethos, logos, and pathos, to develop her argument. Your essay should not explain whether you agree with Kingsbury’s claims. Instead it should explain and evaluate how Kingsbury builds an argument to persuade the audience.

. 82

Step-by-step answer

11.02.2022, solved by verified expert
Unlock the full answer
4 students found this answer . helpful

The article, Tripping System Exacerbates Unfair Pay at Restaurants, by Kathleen Kingsbury is written about her perspective on employees that are being underpaid after working long hours. Kingsbury uses a story of an employee, statistic and diction to show how employees get unfair pay at restaurants for working long hours. Kingsbury states, “nationwide, an Aspen Institute study suggests that nearly 40 percent of restaurant workers earn at or below the federal minimum wage of $7.25, even with tips factored in.”(P. 12).Waitresses that often work at gritty bars and grills feel as if they have no choice but to flirt or laugh along with customers even if it's an insulting comment. The argument is about the unfair tipping system that is an unfair pay at restaurants. Therefore, Kingsbury first applies her rhetorical strategy of ethos to show the readers that other industries and states have changed the tipping system, offering a reason to push other states to do so as well. Kingsbury states, “Other than restaurants, few other industries let bosses rely mainly on customers' generosity to set employee wages” .She also mentions in that specific paragraph how it made sense to everyone at that time due to being tipped with cash., so they were able to keep that money with any other fees. However, with the

introduction of credit card payments, the amount of money received from a tip has decreased further, lessening the already poor pay that they received. Kingsbury more than likely used these lines in her beginning paragraphs in order to show the reader how the tipping system has failed and been bad, and but only worsened with time, hurting the waiters/waitresses further.


 

It is was helpful?

Faq

English
Step-by-step answer
P Answered by PhD

The correct answer is: simile

Through this text, we can see that the phrase "It is as if a great earthen pot has dropped from an unreachable rafter'' represents a comparison with the doubts that the narrator presents. This comparison is made through two elements that have nothing in common, but that the author uses to create a new meaning about one of them. This is done through simile.

English
Step-by-step answer
P Answered by Master

Answer:

Please, see below:

Step-by-step explanation:

Thoreau states, “… When an acorn and a chestnut fall side by side… bothobey their own laws…” (3). This can be interpreted as success being obtainable withoutthe assistance of another. The acorn and the chestnut are two individuals that are uniquein their own way yet had the same result. The same goes for people; for those reachingthe same goal as another, it is much better to do it under your qualities and your own way.The purpose of this passage was for Thoreau to inform his audience on his viewson the government and its negative affects on civilization. With its restrictions, peoplecannot fully live up to their potential because the bureaucracy will always limit them.Thoreau wants his audience to become successful in their own manor and uses theserhetorical devices to sync with his readers

English
Step-by-step answer
P Answered by PhD

Answer:

In lines 578-579, Mrs. Keeney tells her husband why she wanted to sail with him: "I wanted to see
you the hero they make you out to be in Homeport." In what way does the voyage change the way she sees her husband? Cite evidence from the play in your answer.
Mrs. Keeney sees that her husband is a hard man who can be brutal toward his crew in pursuit of
his goal. In lines 650-653, she tells him, "You want to live up to your silly reputation even if you do
have to beat and starve men and drive me mad to do it."
At the end of the play, Captain Keeney breaks his promise to his wife, even though he says he loves
her. What is the motivation for his behavior, beyond simple economic opportunity?
Keeney's pride pushes him to put his goal of
getting the oil ahead of any feelings for his wife. He needs to get the oil to feel strong and to prove himself. At the same time, he denies that his wife is really going mad, saying, "I know you're foolin' me" (lines 892-893). He may feel justified in staying "jest a little while longer" at sea because he can't believe she is actually losing her mind and because she insisted on making the voyage in the first place.

Step-by-step explanation:

make necessary changes as required to make the points better

English
Step-by-step answer
P Answered by PhD

Answer:

The phrase "we'll head north again, in other words, to the land of sensible people" shows that the entire venture, planned by the Professor and the Captain was not wise. It has a critical tone.

Step-by-step explanation:

The phrase above was uttered by the Canadian in the book, "Twenty Thousand Leagues Under the Seas Revised" By Jules Verne. He meant that the venture which they had undertaken was fruitless and unwise.

He criticized the journey because at that time the Nautilus was stuck in the ice and could no longer move forward.

English
Step-by-step answer
P Answered by PhD

Answer:

Please, see below:

Step-by-step explanation:

Based on the context of the presented proposal, we can give such a definition:
Reverence is a feeling of deep respect or awe, in this case for nature. Reverence can be a feeling of awe, and it can also describe how you feel about something, especially.

English
Step-by-step answer
P Answered by PhD

Answer:

Aslan orders the creatures around him to prepare a feast for the children. Then he leads Peter aside and shows him Cair Paravel, a castle on a peninsula where the children will live and reign. Aslan tells Peter that he will "be the High King over all the rest." As they are talking, Peter and Aslan hear Susan's horn, which Father Christmas gave her. She is supposed to blow the horn when she is in danger, as it will bring help. The other animals begin to run to help her, but Aslan stops them and waves Peter on.

Peter runs over and sees Susan climbing a tree, pursued by a huge wolf. She only gets as far as the first branch before she comes so close to fainting that she cannot go any higher. Peter knows that if she faints she will fall to danger. He rushes over and stabs the wolf in the heart with the sword that Father Christmas gave him. There is a short struggle, but in the end the wolf lies dead at Peter's feet. Aslan sees another wolf dash into the thicket and sends his fastest animals after it, saying that the wolf will lead them to the Witch and to Edmund. He then knights Peter, after chastising him for forgetting to wipe his sword.

Step-by-step explanation:

read the pasaage and make changes and extract valid points

English
Step-by-step answer
P Answered by PhD

Answer:

This phrase means that Rip Van Winkle's son took the time and did anything but his business.
He inherited this trait from his father.

Step-by-step explanation:

"To make a long story short, the company broke up, and returned to the more important concerns of the election. Rip's daughter took him home to live with her ; she had a snug, well-furnished house, and a stout, cheery farmer for a husband, whom Rip 660 recollected for one of the urchins that used to climb upon his back. As to Rip's son and heir, who was the ditto of himselt, seen leaning against the tree, he was employed to Avork on the farm ; but evinced a hereditary disposition to attend to anything else but 665 his business."

English
Step-by-step answer
P Answered by PhD

Answer: B. to help readers understand the context.

Explanation:
As many of the motivations for the characters and the way the setting works according to any specific period or society influence the context of a story it is a very functional tool for author to set the mood of the story, it will not always be the same this will be changing according to the development of both the story and the characters and that's why it helps readers not only to connect with the story but to get it better.

English
Step-by-step answer
P Answered by PhD

Answer:

Given below

Step-by-step explanation:

The King of Mazy May," we can infer that the Klondike Gold Rush was brutal and that those who took part in it were in constant danger of having their lands claimed and taken away by others


 

The brutality of the Klondike Gold Rush and the continual threat of having their properties seized and taken away by others are clear from reading "The King of Mazy May."

How to explain the story?

Jack London (1876-1916) based The King of Mazy May and other stories on his actual experiences during the Klondike Gold Rush. As gold was discovered in the Yukon region of Canada, various men tried to strike it rich.

The narrative demonstrates how difficult the circumstances were: among other difficulties, it was difficult to move around and survive due to the bitter cold and great distances.

But the threat of losing everything was even terrible. Men who failed to register their land were at risk of having it taken away by skilled stampeders. That is what occurs in the narrative. 14-year-old Walt, the main character, seeks to stop stampeders from seizing his neighbor's land. The men pursue Walt and shot at him in an effort to murder him.

We can conclude that the Klondike Gold Rush was violent and perilous.

From reading "The King of Mazy May," we can infer that the Klondike Gold Rush was brutal and that those who took part in it were in constant danger of having their lands claimed and taken away by others.

"The King of Mazy May" is a short story by Jack London (1876-1916), who based this and other stories on his own experience during the Klondike Gold Rush.

In the region of Yukon, in Canada, as gold was discovered, several men tried to strike it rich.

The story shows us how harsh the conditions were: the extreme cold and the long distances, among other issues, made it hard to survive and move about.

But even worse was the danger of losing it all. Men who did not register their piece of land could easily have it taken away by professional stampeders.

That is what happens in the story. The main character, 14-year-old Walt, tries to prevent stampeders from stealing his neighbor's land.

The men chase Walt and try to kill him by shooting at him.

In conclusion, we can infer that the Klondike Gold Rush was brutal and dangerous.

Try asking the Studen AI a question.

It will provide an instant answer!

FREE