Answer:Please, see below:
Because of the complete regularity and lack of human connection, living in a house that takes care of everything cannot be characterised as leading a carefree existence. While the house always provides everything without fail, the idea of "living" entails a family remaining together of their own volition. Everyone who lives there will eventually find the routine dull and oppressive because living in that house makes everything automatic and readily available, especially since humans have a tendency to need to break free from routines in order to avoid becoming burned out or sad. Humans occasionally require a change in environment and atmosphere. Living in a house who gives you everything will probably discredit your need for change once in a while.
The introduction sentence isn’t very clear. But it should go something like this “The setting of the novel Fahrenheit 451 is set on a Utopian society in which Guy Montag lives”. The second sentence is pretty good and simple. The 3rd could use more description “Guy is a firefighter who is responsible for the burning of every book (What book? What does it talk about? Why does he have to burn it?) and also the houses of individuals who keep these books with them. Also put a ; on “...things are with his job; his neighbor...”
In the first paragraph I’d be best if the first 6 sentences belong to the first paragraph and the rest you use it for the 2nd paragraph and start with “Montag decides to quit his job with firm determination” As for the 2nd paragraph eliminate the transition “To start” and use something else. Also, it’s very nice just fix the grammatical errors like tv family and put “family TV” and something confuses me: Do people really ride jet cars on the streets? Or do they ride the jet cars on the skies? I think I’d be nice if you clarified this. Also, use more quotes in paragraph 2, it’s nice but you only used one to prove your veracity.
i didnt feel like reading all of it but it was a great movie
you should write about her and the young boy she met earlier going out on an adventure to look for her mother
A. having to move into her brother's room.
its not 3rd person narrative (its 1st person). The transition to her brother's room hasn't happened yet
C. The sacrifice of sharing a room with my brother was going to be worth it.
The first few passages were kind of a flashback description of her grandparents and how awesome they were, so that would be more of a prologue.
At the beginning of the story, Olinda is furious that she would have to be sharing her room with her brother, who is very messy.
However, her attitude changes by the end of the story. She sees that she would have to make sacrifices to live with her grandparents, and that this sacrifice was worth it.
Hope this helps!
BSydney is concerned about their house, but once the tornado sirens sound and they go down into the shelter, she realizes that the only thing that truly matters is that her family is safe.
Sydney is proven to be dynamic in the story. At first, she looked to be a normal girl who does not do anything serious in her life. However, after losing her house during the tornado strike changes her into a responsible member of her family. She takes every moment of his life in doing something positive. She also cares about her family and her house because she know the pain of losing everthing all at once. When she came to know that the storm will hit again, she develops a feeling that she cannot articulate anything but she accepted the truth and keep on doing the precautionary measures.
If not mistaken, the answer is D.
The author's argument is strengthened by referencing the inadequacies in the justice system which fails to give a fair hearing to immigrants. Hence, the correct option is ;widespread abuses in the criminal justice system.The author argued about the sanity and the concept of the immigration law and processes in the United States as they never consider the well being of the kids of immigrants. Hence, leaving many of these kids with an uphill task of having to live far away from their loved ones. In other to strengthen her argument, the author noted the corrupt practices of attorneys who would rip immigrants with promises to help them become legal. It was also pointed out that the immigration system does not allow a fair hearing to immigrants.
Therefore, the author buttressed her argument by making reference to the inadequacies in the criminal justice system