English : asked on ltpatsfan
 23.04.2021

I need to annotate a copy of Nicholas Kristof's essay, Do you care More about a Dog Than a Refugee." High;ighting firsthand and secondhand evidence. At least five examples. Color code by BLUE for Ethos, Pink for Pathos, and Yellow for Logos. Finally I need to analyze how each type of evidence establishes either Ethos, Logos, or Pathos.

. 0

Step-by-step answer

23.03.2023, solved by verified expert
Unlock the full answer
1 students found this answer . helpful

Answer:

Answer given below:

Step-by-step explanation:

Here are five examples of firsthand and secondhand evidence in Nicholas Kristof's essay, "Do You Care More About a Dog Than a Refugee," along with an analysis of how each type of evidence establishes ethos, logos, or pathos:

1) Firsthand evidence: Kristof describes a Syrian refugee family he met in Lebanon who were living in a tent with no heat, electricity, or running water. He notes that the family's "only assets were mattresses, a cooking pot and some clothes" and that the children had not been to school in years.

Analysis: This type of evidence establishes pathos by appealing to the reader's emotions and evoking sympathy for the plight of refugees. Kristof's firsthand experience of meeting the family also adds to his ethos as a credible and knowledgeable source on the topic of refugees.

2) Secondhand evidence: Kristof cites a study showing that Americans donate far more money to animal charities than to organizations that help refugees.

Analysis: This type of evidence establishes logos by appealing to the reader's sense of logic and reason. The statistical evidence makes a logical argument that people care more about animals than refugees. However, the use of the study as evidence also establishes ethos by positioning Kristof as an informed and trustworthy source.

3) Firsthand evidence: Kristof describes a dog that was rescued from a burning building and treated with top-of-the-line medical care, while refugees in nearby camps were left without basic necessities.

Analysis: This type of evidence establishes pathos by appealing to the reader's emotions and evoking feelings of anger and frustration at the unfair treatment of refugees. It also highlights the illogical priorities of society, which can undermine the ethos of those who prioritize animal welfare over human welfare.

4) Secondhand evidence: Kristof cites the UN's estimate that there are currently 65 million displaced people worldwide, the highest number in history.

Analysis: This type of evidence establishes logos by appealing to the reader's sense of logic and reason. The statistic is a powerful illustration of the scope and scale of the refugee crisis, and makes a logical argument that it is a pressing global issue. The use of the UN as a source also adds to Kristof's ethos as a credible and informed commentator.

5) Firsthand evidence: Kristof describes his experience of visiting a Syrian refugee camp in Jordan and meeting families who had fled their homes due to violence.

Analysis: This type of evidence establishes pathos by appealing to the reader's emotions and evoking sympathy for the refugees. It also adds to Kristof's ethos as a credible and knowledgeable source on the topic of refugees, based on his firsthand experience.

Here is how each type of evidence establishes ethos, logos, or pathos:

Ethos: Firsthand evidence establishes Kristof as a credible and knowledgeable source, based on his direct experience with refugees. Secondhand evidence that cites reputable sources, such as the UN, also adds to Kristof's credibility as an informed commentator.

Logos: Secondhand evidence, particularly statistical evidence, appeals to the reader's sense of logic and reason, making a logical argument in support of Kristof's claims.

Pathos: Firsthand evidence, particularly personal stories and experiences, appeals to the reader's emotions, evoking sympathy and empathy for the plight of refugees. It can also highlight the illogical or unfair treatment of refugees, appealing to the reader's sense of justice and morality.

It is was helpful?

Faq

English
Step-by-step answer
P Answered by PhD

Answer: B. the uncontrollable power of nature.

In this passage, we can see how powerful the colossal Moby-Dick is, and how frail and insignificant humans appear to be by comparison. When Ahab wants to fight with the whale, he is completely helpless and is easily defeated and injured. The power of the whale is a symbol that represents the incontrollable power of nature.

English
Step-by-step answer
P Answered by PhD

Answer:

Please, see below:

Step-by-step explanation:

Based on the context of the presented proposal, we can give such a definition:
Reverence is a feeling of deep respect or awe, in this case for nature. Reverence can be a feeling of awe, and it can also describe how you feel about something, especially.

English
Step-by-step answer
P Answered by PhD

Answer:

Answer is in an image

Step-by-step explanation:

English
Step-by-step answer
P Answered by PhD

Answer:

Aslan orders the creatures around him to prepare a feast for the children. Then he leads Peter aside and shows him Cair Paravel, a castle on a peninsula where the children will live and reign. Aslan tells Peter that he will "be the High King over all the rest." As they are talking, Peter and Aslan hear Susan's horn, which Father Christmas gave her. She is supposed to blow the horn when she is in danger, as it will bring help. The other animals begin to run to help her, but Aslan stops them and waves Peter on.

Peter runs over and sees Susan climbing a tree, pursued by a huge wolf. She only gets as far as the first branch before she comes so close to fainting that she cannot go any higher. Peter knows that if she faints she will fall to danger. He rushes over and stabs the wolf in the heart with the sword that Father Christmas gave him. There is a short struggle, but in the end the wolf lies dead at Peter's feet. Aslan sees another wolf dash into the thicket and sends his fastest animals after it, saying that the wolf will lead them to the Witch and to Edmund. He then knights Peter, after chastising him for forgetting to wipe his sword.

Step-by-step explanation:

read the pasaage and make changes and extract valid points

English
Step-by-step answer
P Answered by PhD

Answer:

This phrase means that Rip Van Winkle's son took the time and did anything but his business.
He inherited this trait from his father.

Step-by-step explanation:

"To make a long story short, the company broke up, and returned to the more important concerns of the election. Rip's daughter took him home to live with her ; she had a snug, well-furnished house, and a stout, cheery farmer for a husband, whom Rip 660 recollected for one of the urchins that used to climb upon his back. As to Rip's son and heir, who was the ditto of himselt, seen leaning against the tree, he was employed to Avork on the farm ; but evinced a hereditary disposition to attend to anything else but 665 his business."

English
Step-by-step answer
P Answered by PhD

Macbeth is Duncan's kinsman and his subject. Duncan is a good king and virtuous man; he has done no particular evil. Duncan is a popular king, and his death would bring sorrow and unrest upon Scotland.

Despite the many reasons Macbeth provides for not killing Duncan, he succumbs to his ambition and follows his wife's bloody plans. Macbeth worries about getting caught, feels Duncan has not done anything to deserve being killed, and believes a host should not kill a guest.

Basically, Macbeth would be violating every rule of gracious hosting by killing Duncan while he is staying at his home.

English
Step-by-step answer
P Answered by PhD

Answer: B. to help readers understand the context.

Explanation:
As many of the motivations for the characters and the way the setting works according to any specific period or society influence the context of a story it is a very functional tool for author to set the mood of the story, it will not always be the same this will be changing according to the development of both the story and the characters and that's why it helps readers not only to connect with the story but to get it better.

English
Step-by-step answer
P Answered by PhD

Answer:

Given below

Step-by-step explanation:

The King of Mazy May," we can infer that the Klondike Gold Rush was brutal and that those who took part in it were in constant danger of having their lands claimed and taken away by others


 

The brutality of the Klondike Gold Rush and the continual threat of having their properties seized and taken away by others are clear from reading "The King of Mazy May."

How to explain the story?

Jack London (1876-1916) based The King of Mazy May and other stories on his actual experiences during the Klondike Gold Rush. As gold was discovered in the Yukon region of Canada, various men tried to strike it rich.

The narrative demonstrates how difficult the circumstances were: among other difficulties, it was difficult to move around and survive due to the bitter cold and great distances.

But the threat of losing everything was even terrible. Men who failed to register their land were at risk of having it taken away by skilled stampeders. That is what occurs in the narrative. 14-year-old Walt, the main character, seeks to stop stampeders from seizing his neighbor's land. The men pursue Walt and shot at him in an effort to murder him.

We can conclude that the Klondike Gold Rush was violent and perilous.

From reading "The King of Mazy May," we can infer that the Klondike Gold Rush was brutal and that those who took part in it were in constant danger of having their lands claimed and taken away by others.

"The King of Mazy May" is a short story by Jack London (1876-1916), who based this and other stories on his own experience during the Klondike Gold Rush.

In the region of Yukon, in Canada, as gold was discovered, several men tried to strike it rich.

The story shows us how harsh the conditions were: the extreme cold and the long distances, among other issues, made it hard to survive and move about.

But even worse was the danger of losing it all. Men who did not register their piece of land could easily have it taken away by professional stampeders.

That is what happens in the story. The main character, 14-year-old Walt, tries to prevent stampeders from stealing his neighbor's land.

The men chase Walt and try to kill him by shooting at him.

In conclusion, we can infer that the Klondike Gold Rush was brutal and dangerous.

English
Step-by-step answer
P Answered by PhD

Answer: D. This myth explains the origins of human misfortune. At the same time, it teaches a moral lesson by warning of the dangers of

Try asking the Studen AI a question.

It will provide an instant answer!

FREE