What argument could be made for reverting selection of US senators back to the state legislators?

The seventeenth amendment is a reform, since it raises a change in the way senators are elected in each state.

The Seventeenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States (Amendment XVII) establishes the direct election of the United States Senate by popular vote. The amendment replaces Article I, Section 3, Clauses 1 and 2 of the constitution, under which the Senate was elected by the State Legislatures. It also alters the method of filling vacancies in the Senate, to be consistent with the method of choice. It was adopted in April 1913.

This form of election is very beneficial for the people, since they are the ones who directly choose the senators that represent them.

Some people will say that this form of election is a bad idea, since the elected senators could be from a political party opposed to the one that bovierna in the state at that time, and therefore could be difficult communication. In this way these people prefer that the senators are elected by the legislature of each state, in order to ensure a fluid and more harmonious communication.

It would take the power away from entrenched political operatives. It would give the people more control over who represents them in the US Senate.

The State legislatures might make a more informed decision about who is qualified to be a US Senator.

The original Constitution didn’t call for direct election of US Senators.

The United States did not directly vote for senators during the first 125 years of the federal government. The Constitution, which was adopted in 1788, declared senators elected by state legislatures. The first proposal to amend the constitution and elect senators by popular vote was presented in the House of Representatives in 1826, but the idea did not receive enough support until the 19th century, when several problems related to elections in the Senate became evident. . . Several state laws were paralyzed by the elections of the senators, which made Senate seats remain vacant for months and even years. In other cases, the political machines gained control over state laws and the senators elected with their support were seen as puppets. In addition, the Senate was perceived as the "millionaire's club". That is public service. The rise of the Popular Party, called the Populist Party, motivated the creation of a Senate more responsible to the public.

The Seventeenth The Constitution of the United States (XVII) the direct election of the United States Senate by popular vote. The amendment replaces Article I, Section 3, Clauses 1 and 2 of the constitution, under which the Senate was elected by the State Legislatures. It also alters the method of filling vacancies in the Senate, to be consistent with the method of choice. It was adopted in April 1913.

The seventeenth amendment is a reform, since it raises a change in the way senators are elected in each state.

The Seventeenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States (Amendment XVII) establishes the direct election of the United States Senate by popular vote. The amendment replaces Article I, Section 3, Clauses 1 and 2 of the constitution, under which the Senate was elected by the State Legislatures. It also alters the method of filling vacancies in the Senate, to be consistent with the method of choice. It was adopted in April 1913.

This form of election is very beneficial for the people, since they are the ones who directly choose the senators that represent them.

Some people will say that this form of election is a bad idea, since the elected senators could be from a political party opposed to the one that bovierna in the state at that time, and therefore could be difficult communication. In this way these people prefer that the senators are elected by the legislature of each state, in order to ensure a fluid and more harmonious communication.

The seventeenth amendment is a reform, since it raises a change in the way senators are elected in each state.

The Seventeenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States (Amendment XVII) establishes the direct election of the United States Senate by popular vote. The amendment replaces Article I, Section 3, Clauses 1 and 2 of the constitution, under which the Senate was elected by the State Legislatures. It also alters the method of filling vacancies in the Senate, to be consistent with the method of choice. It was adopted in April 1913.

This form of election is very beneficial for the people, since they are the ones who directly choose the senators that represent them.

Some people will say that this form of election is a bad idea, since the elected senators could be from a political party opposed to the one that bovierna in the state at that time, and therefore could be difficult communication. In this way these people prefer that the senators are elected by the legislature of each state, in order to ensure a fluid and more harmonious communication.

The answer  is below:

Explanation:

It is required to abolish the right of the governor to make appointments of provisional senators, since they generally do so according to their designation or political party, which takes away the right of the people to make these appointments.

In addition, the term of the senators is very long, those who are in favor of the repeal of this amendment affirm that it really is unconstitutional and removes the possibilities of advancing new changes and ideas in favor of the people and that they are truly equitable for all regardless of his political party.

In 1911, the House of Representatives approved the Joint Resolution of Assembly 39 (House Joint Resolution 39), proposing a constitutional amendment for the direct election of the senators. However, it included a race provision (Race Rider) created to block federal intervention in cases of racial discrimination among voters. A substitute amendment created by Senator Joseph L. Bristow (R-KS) eliminated that race provision. The amendment, Joint Resolution, was adopted by the Senate, in a close vote on May 1911. More than a year later, the House accepted this change, and the amendment was sent to the states for ratification. On April 8, 1913, three-quarters of the states had ratified the proposed amendment, and it was officially included as the 17th amendment.

Explanation:

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Unfortunately, you did not include the two maps. Without them, we do not know your specific reference.

However, trying to help you and after doing some deep research, we can say the maps portray the Spanish, British, and Dutch trade maritime routes from 1750 to 1850. The other map shows the many trade routes in 2010 that practically crossed all over the world.

That is why we can answer that one significant reason for changes in the patterns of global economic interactions from circa 1750 to circa 2000, as illustrated by the two maps are the technology and modernization of means of transportation that today include land, air, and sea.

Trade has been the activity that has developed most rapidly all over the world in those years. Today, there are international organizations and free trade agreements that connect the world through trade.

More people on the planet started to require more products from all places and developed nations exploited natural resources and raw materials and produced more and better goods in their industrialized cities that were exported.

see explanation and i got an a btw.

Explanation:

b. The development of diseases in the sixteenth century would support the arguments of the “new generation of historians in the second paragraph because the “new generation of historians” would look at this in relation to european imperialism and see the impact of the european diseases like smallpox that would plague places like modern day united states because of the european immunity, but lack of native immunity.  

c. The “biological competition” contributed to the European imperialism in the Americas by creating a survival of the fittest environment where the europeans brought in diseases like smallpox that had plagued europe generations ago, but infected the native populations and weaken them in both their numbers and their strength, which enabled the Europeans to take control of the new world and develop a dominance while the natives were fighting a disease. This was “biological competition” because the Europeans' immunity was assisting them in fighting the natives' lack thereof.