what was the trade policy president madison proposed

1.) Political; Constitutional; Articles of Confederation; national

4.)D? (I'm not for sure, about 80% positive)

5.) A&C (I don't know about C)

6.)Virtual; Actual

7.)Stamp Act(?);Declaratory Act(S); Division(?)

8.)A(?)

9.)D

Sorry I don't know them all, but I hope this helped.! =^^=

1.) Political; Constitutional; Articles of Confederation; national

4.)D? (I'm not for sure, about 80% positive)

5.) A&C (I don't know about C)

6.)Virtual; Actual

7.)Stamp Act(?);Declaratory Act(S); Division(?)

8.)A(?)

9.)D

Sorry I don't know them all, but I hope this helped.! =^^=

1.) Political; Constitutional; Articles of Confederation; national

4.)D? (I'm not for sure, about 80% positive)

5.) A&C (I don't know about C)

6.)Virtual; Actual

7.)Stamp Act(?);Declaratory Act(S); Division(?)

8.)A(?)

9.)D

Sorry I don't know them all, but I hope this helped.! =^^=

Explanation:

President James Madison in an attempt to show support and inclination towards France made a strategic foreign policy mistake which had heavy repercussions.

During that point of time, France and Britain were rivals and the decision made by President Madison to accept Napoleon's promise to repeal its trade restrictions aggravated Britain.

With the passage of the Macon’s Bill No. 2 by Congress, it further heated the relation with Britain. The U.S had to impose an embargo to Britain as she did not follow the demand of the bill.

The embargo on Britain in return led to a number of challenges and only  proved that U.S was not in position to challenge the British government during that time.

Explanation:

President James Madison in an attempt to show support and inclination towards France made a strategic foreign policy mistake which had heavy repercussions.

During that point of time, France and Britain were rivals and the decision made by President Madison to accept Napoleon's promise to repeal its trade restrictions aggravated Britain.

With the passage of the Macon’s Bill No. 2 by Congress, it further heated the relation with Britain. The U.S had to impose an embargo to Britain as she did not follow the demand of the bill.

The embargo on Britain in return led to a number of challenges and only  proved that U.S was not in position to challenge the British government during that time.

Hello. This question is incomplete. The full question is:

"That was a war of National defence, required for the vindication of the National rights and honor, and demanded by the indignant voice of the People. President [James] Madison ... at first, reluctantly and with great doubt and hesitation, brought himself to the conviction that it ought to be declared. ... It was a just war, and its great object, as announced at the time, was 'Free Trade and Sailors Rights,' against the intolerable and oppressive acts of British power on the ocean. The justice of the war, far from being denied or controverted, was admitted by the Federal party, which only questioned it on considerations of policy. ... How totally variant is the present war! This is no war of defence, but one of unnecessary and of offensive aggression. It is Mexico that is defending her fi re-sides, her castles and her altars, not we. And how different also is the conduct of the Whig party of the present day from that of the major part of the Federal party during the war of 1812! Far from interposing any obstacles to the prosecution of the war, if the Whigs in office are reproachable at all, it is for having lent too ready a facility to it, without careful examination into the objects of the war."—Henry Clay, Speech about the Mexican War, 1847

Clay's speech foreshadows the congressional debate over the...?

The  slavery in the Mexican Cession

Explanation:

Mexico's surrender during the Mexican War was accomplished with the signing of the Guadalupe-Hidalgo Treaty. In that treaty, Mexico assigned 525,000 square miles of territory to the United States in return for a payment of $ 15 million. This territory ceded to the USA, had a question about slavery that was not corresponding with the legislation of slavery in the USA.

This excerpt from Clay's speech foreshadows how the issue of slavery would be a problem to be solved in the USA later, in relation to the land donated by Mexico.

Hello. This question is incomplete. The full question is:

"That was a war of National defence, required for the vindication of the National rights and honor, and demanded by the indignant voice of the People. President [James] Madison ... at first, reluctantly and with great doubt and hesitation, brought himself to the conviction that it ought to be declared. ... It was a just war, and its great object, as announced at the time, was 'Free Trade and Sailors Rights,' against the intolerable and oppressive acts of British power on the ocean. The justice of the war, far from being denied or controverted, was admitted by the Federal party, which only questioned it on considerations of policy. ... How totally variant is the present war! This is no war of defence, but one of unnecessary and of offensive aggression. It is Mexico that is defending her fi re-sides, her castles and her altars, not we. And how different also is the conduct of the Whig party of the present day from that of the major part of the Federal party during the war of 1812! Far from interposing any obstacles to the prosecution of the war, if the Whigs in office are reproachable at all, it is for having lent too ready a facility to it, without careful examination into the objects of the war."—Henry Clay, Speech about the Mexican War, 1847

Clay's speech foreshadows the congressional debate over the...?

The  slavery in the Mexican Cession

Explanation:

Mexico's surrender during the Mexican War was accomplished with the signing of the Guadalupe-Hidalgo Treaty. In that treaty, Mexico assigned 525,000 square miles of territory to the United States in return for a payment of $ 15 million. This territory ceded to the USA, had a question about slavery that was not corresponding with the legislation of slavery in the USA.

This excerpt from Clay's speech foreshadows how the issue of slavery would be a problem to be solved in the USA later, in relation to the land donated by Mexico.

1.

In 1574, Akbar the emperor of the Subcontinent ordered his wazir to make a Katab-khana in the palace. This was to discover and reintroduce old texts. Books like Rajatarangini, Ramayana and Mahabharata were translated into different languages. One of these languages was Persian. After this many different old books both religious and non-religious were translated for the general public to read.

This was done to make different sects and religions stay united. His actions to a certain extent did eliminate disagreements between the people from different religions.

2.

Abu'l-Fazl ibn Mubarak was not the person behind Akbar's policies. It was actually his favorite wife named Mariam-uz-Zamani. She was a Hindu by birth. She was born at the house of Raja Bharmal of Amber. Later, when she grew up she was married to Akber. This marriage had political benefits. Jahangir was her son. She, however, did not play any political role in the Mughal court.  

3.

A) Ethnic divisions hindered the development of land-based empires in the period 1450-1750. For example, the Manchu people in the Qing Dynasty in China sought to preserve their ethnic values while ruling China, which proved to be an obstacle for them to rule the vast majority of Han Chinese.

B) Ethnic divisions also hindered the development of maritime empires in the period 1450-1750. For example, the ethnic division between the French colonists and the Haitian people led to multiple Haitian rebellions and ultimately the Haitian Revolution against France.

C) Many land-based empires and maritime empires institutionalized hierarchical distinctions amongst different ethnic groups, often with the use of slavery. The European colonists, for instance, made African Americans the lowest class in American society by enslaving them. Similarly, Christians under Ottoman rule are recruited as janissaries. In both examples, the ruling class adopted policies that limit the social mobility of the ethnic groups that are alien to themselves.