Answer:
A. Income.Step-by-step explanation:
People define the Commerce Compromise (which is a part of the U.S. constitution) in two ways. The first is that they define it simply as addressing questions of imports and exports. The second way is that they consider it about imports and exports, as well as the slave trade. They both deal with the movement of what was considered at the time commerce, hence the two ways of looking at it. The two compromises that can be considered part of the Commerce Compromise are as follows:
The first component has to deal with imports and exports. The question that they were addressing was should there be a tariff (or tax) on imports (products entering the country for sale) and exports (products leaving the country to sell to other nations)? Northerners felt that there should be a tax on both, while southerners did not believe there should be a tax on exports. The compromise came to be that there would be a tariff on imports, but not exports. In addition, the federal government would oversee interstate commerce (this is the trade, movement, or anything else regarding goods that move across state lines).
The second component was about the slave trade. Some of the founding fathers, and many northerners, wanted to ban the slave trade as many felt that it could tear the nation apart and/or that it was immoral. The southern economy was reliant on slavery, so those men wanted to keep the slave trade. The deal that was made was that the slave trade would continue until 1808. After 1808, Congress would have the authority to ban it.