30.12.2022


write an essay that analyzes the rhetorical choices Thoreau makes to convey his message about the value of walking in nature

. 0

Step-by-step answer

08.05.2023, solved by verified expert
Unlock the full answer
1 students found this answer . helpful

Answer:

See below

Step-by-step explanation:

In his essay "Walking," Henry David Thoreau advocates for the value of walking in nature as a means of achieving self-discovery, spiritual growth, and a deeper connection with the natural world. To effectively convey his message, Thoreau makes several rhetorical choices that appeal to the reader's emotions, logic, and sense of morality.

One of Thoreau's primary rhetorical strategies is the use of vivid, sensory language to paint a vivid picture of the natural world. He describes the sights, sounds, and smells of the woods in intricate detail, using sensory imagery to transport the reader into the natural environment. For example, he writes, "The woods were made for the hunters of dreams, the brooks for the fishers of song; to the hunters of dreams the woods are full of precious stones, and of birds with finer plumage, and of flowers with stranger fragrance than any hothouse or garden can boast" (Thoreau). By creating a rich sensory experience for the reader, Thoreau inspires a sense of wonder and reverence for the natural world, encouraging readers to explore and appreciate the world around them.

Another rhetorical strategy employed by Thoreau is the use of metaphor and analogy to convey complex ideas. He compares walking to "sauntering," a term that he suggests comes from the French "sainte-terre," meaning "holy land." By using this metaphor, Thoreau elevates walking to a spiritual activity, suggesting that it can lead to a sense of transcendence and connection with the divine. He also compares the natural world to a great library, full of wisdom and knowledge, waiting to be discovered by those who take the time to explore it. These analogies help to clarify Thoreau's message and make it more accessible to the reader.

Thoreau also employs rhetorical appeals to logic and reason to support his argument. He argues that walking is essential to physical and mental health, and that modern society's focus on productivity and efficiency has led us to neglect this vital aspect of human experience. He writes, "The incessant anxiety and strain of some is a well-nigh incurable form of disease. We are made to exaggerate the importance of what work we do; and yet how much is not done by us!...We should treat ourselves as innocent and untried beings, whose susceptibility to temptation is not to be measured by experience" (Thoreau). By using logical appeals, Thoreau makes a convincing case for the value of walking in nature, suggesting that it is not only enjoyable, but necessary for our well-being.

In conclusion, Thoreau's essay "Walking" is a powerful call to reconnect with the natural world through the simple act of walking. By using vivid sensory language, metaphor and analogy, and logical appeals, Thoreau inspires readers to explore the natural world, and to find meaning and purpose in the process. His message is as relevant today as it was in his own time, reminding us that by slowing down and taking the time to experience the world around us, we can find peace, happiness, and a sense of connection with the natural world.

It is was helpful?

Faq

English
Step-by-step answer
P Answered by PhD

Answer: B. the uncontrollable power of nature.

In this passage, we can see how powerful the colossal Moby-Dick is, and how frail and insignificant humans appear to be by comparison. When Ahab wants to fight with the whale, he is completely helpless and is easily defeated and injured. The power of the whale is a symbol that represents the incontrollable power of nature.

English
Step-by-step answer
P Answered by Specialist

Answer:

Answer explained in detail below.

Step-by-step explanation:

In the passage "Boston Navy Yard and the 'Great War,' 1914-1918," the author presents a detailed account of the history of the Boston Navy Yard, specifically focusing on its transformation during World War I. The author develops the significance of this transformation by providing historical context, describing specific events and changes at the Navy Yard, and highlighting the impact of the Yard's actions on the war effort.

The author begins by providing historical context for the Boston Navy Yard, describing its establishment in 1801 and its role as a major naval shipyard for the United States. This sets the stage for the significance of the Yard's transformation during World War I, as it was a key player in the war effort.

The author then describes specific events and changes that occurred at the Navy Yard during the war. For example, the author notes that the Yard's workforce grew from 2,500 workers to over 20,000, and that the Yard's production of ships and submarines increased dramatically. The author also describes how the Yard adapted to the changing needs of the war, such as by building subchasers and convoy escort ships.

The author also highlights the impact of the Yard's actions on the war effort. For example, the author states that the Yard's production of destroyers and submarines helped to tip the balance of the war in favor of the Allies. The author also notes that the Yard's actions played a significant role in the success of the convoy system, which helped to protect supplies and troops being transported across the Atlantic.

Overall, the author develops the significance of the Boston Navy Yard's transformation during World War I by providing historical context, describing specific events and changes at the Navy Yard, and highlighting the impact of the Yard's actions on the war effort. This information provides a clear understanding of the importance of the Navy Yard in the war and its impact on the outcome of the war.

English
Step-by-step answer
P Answered by PhD

Answer:

In lines 578-579, Mrs. Keeney tells her husband why she wanted to sail with him: "I wanted to see
you the hero they make you out to be in Homeport." In what way does the voyage change the way she sees her husband? Cite evidence from the play in your answer.
Mrs. Keeney sees that her husband is a hard man who can be brutal toward his crew in pursuit of
his goal. In lines 650-653, she tells him, "You want to live up to your silly reputation even if you do
have to beat and starve men and drive me mad to do it."
At the end of the play, Captain Keeney breaks his promise to his wife, even though he says he loves
her. What is the motivation for his behavior, beyond simple economic opportunity?
Keeney's pride pushes him to put his goal of
getting the oil ahead of any feelings for his wife. He needs to get the oil to feel strong and to prove himself. At the same time, he denies that his wife is really going mad, saying, "I know you're foolin' me" (lines 892-893). He may feel justified in staying "jest a little while longer" at sea because he can't believe she is actually losing her mind and because she insisted on making the voyage in the first place.

Step-by-step explanation:

make necessary changes as required to make the points better

English
Step-by-step answer
P Answered by PhD

Answer:

The phrase "we'll head north again, in other words, to the land of sensible people" shows that the entire venture, planned by the Professor and the Captain was not wise. It has a critical tone.

Step-by-step explanation:

The phrase above was uttered by the Canadian in the book, "Twenty Thousand Leagues Under the Seas Revised" By Jules Verne. He meant that the venture which they had undertaken was fruitless and unwise.

He criticized the journey because at that time the Nautilus was stuck in the ice and could no longer move forward.

English
Step-by-step answer
P Answered by PhD

Answer:

Please, see below:

Step-by-step explanation:

Based on the context of the presented proposal, we can give such a definition:
Reverence is a feeling of deep respect or awe, in this case for nature. Reverence can be a feeling of awe, and it can also describe how you feel about something, especially.

English
Step-by-step answer
P Answered by PhD

Answer:

check below

Step-by-step explanation:

George and Lennie dream of getting their own farm. George wants the independence that comes with owning his own land, and Lennie wants to have rabbits. Their dream is the central theme in the story. It is their dream that brings them to the ranch, and that dream spreads to Candy and Crooks.

George is small while Lennie is burly in terms of physical size. George is cunning and calculating while Lennie is obtuse and carefree. But from the early scene where the two stopped to drink water, you can already perceive that George is the one who looks after Lennie.

Lennie and George have an argument over a mouse that Lennie has petted a little too hard and long. Lennie wants to keep the dead mouse in his pocket, but George throws it away.

English
Step-by-step answer
P Answered by PhD

Answer:

Aslan orders the creatures around him to prepare a feast for the children. Then he leads Peter aside and shows him Cair Paravel, a castle on a peninsula where the children will live and reign. Aslan tells Peter that he will "be the High King over all the rest." As they are talking, Peter and Aslan hear Susan's horn, which Father Christmas gave her. She is supposed to blow the horn when she is in danger, as it will bring help. The other animals begin to run to help her, but Aslan stops them and waves Peter on.

Peter runs over and sees Susan climbing a tree, pursued by a huge wolf. She only gets as far as the first branch before she comes so close to fainting that she cannot go any higher. Peter knows that if she faints she will fall to danger. He rushes over and stabs the wolf in the heart with the sword that Father Christmas gave him. There is a short struggle, but in the end the wolf lies dead at Peter's feet. Aslan sees another wolf dash into the thicket and sends his fastest animals after it, saying that the wolf will lead them to the Witch and to Edmund. He then knights Peter, after chastising him for forgetting to wipe his sword.

Step-by-step explanation:

read the pasaage and make changes and extract valid points

English
Step-by-step answer
P Answered by PhD

Answer:

This phrase means that Rip Van Winkle's son took the time and did anything but his business.
He inherited this trait from his father.

Step-by-step explanation:

"To make a long story short, the company broke up, and returned to the more important concerns of the election. Rip's daughter took him home to live with her ; she had a snug, well-furnished house, and a stout, cheery farmer for a husband, whom Rip 660 recollected for one of the urchins that used to climb upon his back. As to Rip's son and heir, who was the ditto of himselt, seen leaning against the tree, he was employed to Avork on the farm ; but evinced a hereditary disposition to attend to anything else but 665 his business."

Try asking the Studen AI a question.

It will provide an instant answer!

FREE