Read the excerpts from "opening statements from John F. Kennedy and Richard M. Nixon First Televised Debate." Kennedy: This is a great country, but I think it could be a greater country; and this is a powerful country, but I think it could be a more powerful country. I'm not satisfied to have fifty percent of our steel-mill capacity unused. I'm not satisfied when the United States had last year the lowest rate of economic growth of any major industrialized society in the world.

Nixon: Let's put it in terms that all of us can understand. We often hear gross national product discussed and in that respect may I say that when we compare the growth in this Administration with that of the previous Administration that then there was a total growth of eleven percent over seven years; in this Administration there has been a total growth of nineteen per cent over seven years. That shows that there's been more growth in this Administration than in its predecessor.

Which best analyzes a difference in the evidence used by each speaker to reach his conclusion?

Kennedy uses facts to compare U.S. economic growth with other industrialized nations, which show the U.S. is lagging; Nixon uses facts to compare the economic growth during this presidency to that during the previous one, which shows that the economy is improving.

Kennedy makes a common assertion about how he will improve the U.S. steel industry; Nixon uses facts to demonstrate that the steel industry, while not perfect, has come a long way in the past seven years.

Kennedy uses specific statistics to argue that economic growth in the U.S. is lagging behind other nations; Nixon relies on common assertions and opinions, rather than facts, to show that the U.S.'s economic growth is forging ahead.

Kennedy compares U.S. steel production to that of other countries to show that the U.S. is lagging; Nixon compares steel production now to steel production during the Truman presidency to show that it is forging ahead.

Kennedy uses facts to compare U.S. economic growth with other industrialized nations, which show the U.S. is lagging; Nixon uses facts to compare the economic growth during this presidency to that during the previous one, which shows that the economy is improving.

Explanation:

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Thoreau states, “… When an acorn and a chestnut fall side by side… bothobey their own laws…” (3). This can be interpreted as success being obtainable withoutthe assistance of another. The acorn and the chestnut are two individuals that are uniquein their own way yet had the same result. The same goes for people; for those reachingthe same goal as another, it is much better to do it under your qualities and your own way.The purpose of this passage was for Thoreau to inform his audience on his viewson the government and its negative affects on civilization. With its restrictions, peoplecannot fully live up to their potential because the bureaucracy will always limit them.Thoreau wants his audience to become successful in their own manor and uses theserhetorical devices to sync with his readers

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

●''Owl Creek Bridge'' isn't a first-person narration, meaning that it's not told from the perspective of the main character, meaning Farquhar. Instead, the text comes from a third-person narrator, or told by an external force or character.

●In some sense, Bierce presents readers with an unreliable third-person narrator. The narrator knows, the entire time, that Peyton is dreaming, but tricks readers into thinking that Peyton has escaped. By representing the scenes of Peyton's dream as reality, the narrator toys with the reader's emotions.

●In “An Occurrence at Owl Creek Bridge” a couple of shifts throughout the story change the entire story's point of view essentially bewildering readers. For instance, in paragraph five, a shift occurs when Peyton Farquhar closes his eyes right before he is to be hung.

●In paragraph 36 of "An Occurrence at Owl Creek Bridge," Bierce shifts from past tense to present tense. Bierce writes that "now he sees another scene . . . he stands at the gate of his own home." The effect here is that the reader believes Farquhar has truly escaped and made it home.

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

In the passage "Boston Navy Yard and the 'Great War,' 1914-1918," the author presents a detailed account of the history of the Boston Navy Yard, specifically focusing on its transformation during World War I. The author develops the significance of this transformation by providing historical context, describing specific events and changes at the Navy Yard, and highlighting the impact of the Yard's actions on the war effort.

The author begins by providing historical context for the Boston Navy Yard, describing its establishment in 1801 and its role as a major naval shipyard for the United States. This sets the stage for the significance of the Yard's transformation during World War I, as it was a key player in the war effort.

The author then describes specific events and changes that occurred at the Navy Yard during the war. For example, the author notes that the Yard's workforce grew from 2,500 workers to over 20,000, and that the Yard's production of ships and submarines increased dramatically. The author also describes how the Yard adapted to the changing needs of the war, such as by building subchasers and convoy escort ships.

The author also highlights the impact of the Yard's actions on the war effort. For example, the author states that the Yard's production of destroyers and submarines helped to tip the balance of the war in favor of the Allies. The author also notes that the Yard's actions played a significant role in the success of the convoy system, which helped to protect supplies and troops being transported across the Atlantic.

Overall, the author develops the significance of the Boston Navy Yard's transformation during World War I by providing historical context, describing specific events and changes at the Navy Yard, and highlighting the impact of the Yard's actions on the war effort. This information provides a clear understanding of the importance of the Navy Yard in the war and its impact on the outcome of the war.

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

The phrase above was uttered by the Canadian in the book, "Twenty Thousand Leagues Under the Seas Revised" By Jules Verne. He meant that the venture which they had undertaken was fruitless and unwise.

He criticized the journey because at that time the Nautilus was stuck in the ice and could no longer move forward.

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

read the pasaage and make changes and extract valid points

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

"To make a long story short, the company broke up, and returned to the more important concerns of the election. Rip's daughter took him home to live with her ; she had a snug, well-furnished house, and a stout, cheery farmer for a husband, whom Rip 660 recollected for one of the urchins that used to climb upon his back. As to Rip's son and heir, who was the ditto of himselt, seen leaning against the tree, he was employed to Avork on the farm ; but evinced a hereditary disposition to attend to anything else but 665 his business."

Macbeth is Duncan's kinsman and his subject. Duncan is a good king and virtuous man; he has done no particular evil. Duncan is a popular king, and his death would bring sorrow and unrest upon Scotland.

Despite the many reasons Macbeth provides for not killing Duncan, he succumbs to his ambition and follows his wife's bloody plans. Macbeth worries about getting caught, feels Duncan has not done anything to deserve being killed, and believes a host should not kill a guest.

Basically, Macbeth would be violating every rule of gracious hosting by killing Duncan while he is staying at his home.