English : asked on rachylt8152
 07.06.2021

The authors use which device to illustrate the firmness of their stance? O 1. references to authorities, including the King and Secretaries of State, who are legal experts

O 2. an appeal to emotion which recalls a once prosperous relationship between the two parties

O 3. repetition of "every thing" at the end of successive phrases to display a willingness to sacrifice

O 4.

a series of rhetorical questions that suggest various reasons why rebellion is a flawed term

. 1

Step-by-step answer

24.06.2023, solved by verified expert
Unlock the full answer
13 students found this answer . helpful

2. an appeal to emotion which recalls a once prosperous relationship between the two parties

Explanation:

Although you have not presented the text to which this question refers, we can say that it is common for authors to illustrate the firmness of their postures with an appeal to the public's emotion. This is because the appeal to emotion shows that the authors have experiences on the subject they are taking a stand on. In this case, this experience shows that the authors are correct, because they lived a situation that gives them support to take a position.

It is was helpful?

Faq

English
Step-by-step answer
P Answered by PhD

2. an appeal to emotion which recalls a once prosperous relationship between the two parties

Explanation:

Although you have not presented the text to which this question refers, we can say that it is common for authors to illustrate the firmness of their postures with an appeal to the public's emotion. This is because the appeal to emotion shows that the authors have experiences on the subject they are taking a stand on. In this case, this experience shows that the authors are correct, because they lived a situation that gives them support to take a position.

English
Step-by-step answer
P Answered by Master

Answer:

Please, see below:

Step-by-step explanation:

Thoreau states, “… When an acorn and a chestnut fall side by side… bothobey their own laws…” (3). This can be interpreted as success being obtainable withoutthe assistance of another. The acorn and the chestnut are two individuals that are uniquein their own way yet had the same result. The same goes for people; for those reachingthe same goal as another, it is much better to do it under your qualities and your own way.The purpose of this passage was for Thoreau to inform his audience on his viewson the government and its negative affects on civilization. With its restrictions, peoplecannot fully live up to their potential because the bureaucracy will always limit them.Thoreau wants his audience to become successful in their own manor and uses theserhetorical devices to sync with his readers

English
Step-by-step answer
P Answered by PhD

Answer:

The phrase "we'll head north again, in other words, to the land of sensible people" shows that the entire venture, planned by the Professor and the Captain was not wise. It has a critical tone.

Step-by-step explanation:

The phrase above was uttered by the Canadian in the book, "Twenty Thousand Leagues Under the Seas Revised" By Jules Verne. He meant that the venture which they had undertaken was fruitless and unwise.

He criticized the journey because at that time the Nautilus was stuck in the ice and could no longer move forward.

English
Step-by-step answer
P Answered by PhD

Answer:

Answer is in an image

Step-by-step explanation:

English
Step-by-step answer
P Answered by PhD

Answer:

Aslan orders the creatures around him to prepare a feast for the children. Then he leads Peter aside and shows him Cair Paravel, a castle on a peninsula where the children will live and reign. Aslan tells Peter that he will "be the High King over all the rest." As they are talking, Peter and Aslan hear Susan's horn, which Father Christmas gave her. She is supposed to blow the horn when she is in danger, as it will bring help. The other animals begin to run to help her, but Aslan stops them and waves Peter on.

Peter runs over and sees Susan climbing a tree, pursued by a huge wolf. She only gets as far as the first branch before she comes so close to fainting that she cannot go any higher. Peter knows that if she faints she will fall to danger. He rushes over and stabs the wolf in the heart with the sword that Father Christmas gave him. There is a short struggle, but in the end the wolf lies dead at Peter's feet. Aslan sees another wolf dash into the thicket and sends his fastest animals after it, saying that the wolf will lead them to the Witch and to Edmund. He then knights Peter, after chastising him for forgetting to wipe his sword.

Step-by-step explanation:

read the pasaage and make changes and extract valid points

English
Step-by-step answer
P Answered by PhD

Answer:

This phrase means that Rip Van Winkle's son took the time and did anything but his business.
He inherited this trait from his father.

Step-by-step explanation:

"To make a long story short, the company broke up, and returned to the more important concerns of the election. Rip's daughter took him home to live with her ; she had a snug, well-furnished house, and a stout, cheery farmer for a husband, whom Rip 660 recollected for one of the urchins that used to climb upon his back. As to Rip's son and heir, who was the ditto of himselt, seen leaning against the tree, he was employed to Avork on the farm ; but evinced a hereditary disposition to attend to anything else but 665 his business."

English
Step-by-step answer
P Answered by PhD

Answer: B. to help readers understand the context.

Explanation:
As many of the motivations for the characters and the way the setting works according to any specific period or society influence the context of a story it is a very functional tool for author to set the mood of the story, it will not always be the same this will be changing according to the development of both the story and the characters and that's why it helps readers not only to connect with the story but to get it better.

English
Step-by-step answer
P Answered by PhD

Answer:

Given below

Step-by-step explanation:

The King of Mazy May," we can infer that the Klondike Gold Rush was brutal and that those who took part in it were in constant danger of having their lands claimed and taken away by others


 

The brutality of the Klondike Gold Rush and the continual threat of having their properties seized and taken away by others are clear from reading "The King of Mazy May."

How to explain the story?

Jack London (1876-1916) based The King of Mazy May and other stories on his actual experiences during the Klondike Gold Rush. As gold was discovered in the Yukon region of Canada, various men tried to strike it rich.

The narrative demonstrates how difficult the circumstances were: among other difficulties, it was difficult to move around and survive due to the bitter cold and great distances.

But the threat of losing everything was even terrible. Men who failed to register their land were at risk of having it taken away by skilled stampeders. That is what occurs in the narrative. 14-year-old Walt, the main character, seeks to stop stampeders from seizing his neighbor's land. The men pursue Walt and shot at him in an effort to murder him.

We can conclude that the Klondike Gold Rush was violent and perilous.

From reading "The King of Mazy May," we can infer that the Klondike Gold Rush was brutal and that those who took part in it were in constant danger of having their lands claimed and taken away by others.

"The King of Mazy May" is a short story by Jack London (1876-1916), who based this and other stories on his own experience during the Klondike Gold Rush.

In the region of Yukon, in Canada, as gold was discovered, several men tried to strike it rich.

The story shows us how harsh the conditions were: the extreme cold and the long distances, among other issues, made it hard to survive and move about.

But even worse was the danger of losing it all. Men who did not register their piece of land could easily have it taken away by professional stampeders.

That is what happens in the story. The main character, 14-year-old Walt, tries to prevent stampeders from stealing his neighbor's land.

The men chase Walt and try to kill him by shooting at him.

In conclusion, we can infer that the Klondike Gold Rush was brutal and dangerous.

Try asking the Studen AI a question.

It will provide an instant answer!

FREE