"America's Place in the 21st Century World" reveals the United States' periods of isolationism and

the interventions that were a result of the Monroe Doctrine. On the other hand, "The Battle Hymn

of the Republic only supports the importance of intervention when basic freedoms are threatened.

Based on the information presented in "America's Place in the 21st Century World" and "The Battle Hymn of the Republic," write an argumentative essay that explains whether the shift from isolationism to interventionism was a positive public policy shift or a negative one.

Be sure to:

Introduce your claim.

• Acknowledge and counter alternate or opposing claims.

Develop your claim and counterclaims fairly and thoroughly to point out the strengths and limitations of both using evidence from BOTH passages.

Use words, phrases, and clauses as well as varied syntax to clarify relationships between claim

and reasons, between reasons and evidence, and between claim and counterclaims. Provide a concluding statement or section that follows from and supports the argument.

Title: Evaluating the Shift from Isolationism to Interventionism: A Comparative Analysis

Introduction:
The United States has witnessed periods of both isolationism and interventionism throughout its history. In examining "America's Place in the 21st Century World" and "The Battle Hymn of the Republic," we are presented with contrasting perspectives on the shift from isolationism to interventionism as a public policy. This essay aims to evaluate whether this shift can be considered a positive or negative development.

Claim:
The shift from isolationism to interventionism can be seen as a positive public policy shift due to its potential to protect basic freedoms and ensure global stability.

Counterclaim:
Some argue that maintaining isolationism is preferable in order to preserve domestic resources and avoid unnecessary foreign entanglements, ultimately prioritizing national prosperity and security.

Development:

1. In "America's Place in the 21st Century World," it is evident that the United States has experienced periods of isolationism. During these times, the nation focused on its internal affairs, avoiding foreign interactions. However, it is crucial to recognize that this approach may limit the nation's influence and involvement in the world. Isolationism can hinder diplomatic relationships, hinder economic partnerships, and restrict the exchange of ideas and knowledge.

2. By contrast, "The Battle Hymn of the Republic" supports the importance of intervention when basic freedoms are threatened. This implies that the United States should actively engage with international affairs to safeguard fundamental human rights worldwide. Intervention may involve military action or diplomatic measures to protect the vulnerable and preserve democratic values. By doing so, the nation can actively contribute to maintaining global stability and supporting oppressed nations.

3. Furthermore, interventionism acknowledges the interconnectedness of countries in the modern world. In an era of globalization, issues like terrorism, climate change, and pandemics transcend national boundaries. Addressing these challenges effectively necessitates international collaboration and collective action. Isolationism may fail to adequately address these global issues, leaving the nation vulnerable to both direct and indirect threats.

4. While arguments in favor of isolationism emphasize the preservation of domestic resources, it is important to consider the potential benefits of interventionism. Intervention can lead to economic growth through the establishment of trade partnerships and resource sharing. Additionally, diplomatic engagement can help foster positive relationships with other nations, enabling cooperation on economic, scientific, and cultural fronts.

5. Although there are risks associated with interventionism, such as potential military conflicts or overextension of resources, these risks can be minimized through careful analysis, strategic planning, and responsible decision-making. Nonetheless, the risks associated with isolationism, like missed opportunities for growth, limited diplomatic influence, and potential global instability due to inaction, should also be considered.

Conclusion:
In conclusion, the shift from isolationism to interventionism can be viewed as a positive public policy shift. Interventionism allows the United States to protect basic freedoms, maintain global stability, and ensure the nation's active involvement in addressing pressing global issues. While the potential risks associated with interventionism must not be overlooked, the limitations of isolationism in an interconnected world reinforce the necessity of active engagement and responsible intervention as a means to promote a prosperous and secure future for both the United States and the global community.

Convection currents in earths mantle are caused by the rise of hot material rising towards the crust, becoming cooler and sinking back down. 

see explanation and i got an a btw.

Explanation:

b. The development of diseases in the sixteenth century would support the arguments of the “new generation of historians in the second paragraph because the “new generation of historians” would look at this in relation to european imperialism and see the impact of the european diseases like smallpox that would plague places like modern day united states because of the european immunity, but lack of native immunity.  

c. The “biological competition” contributed to the European imperialism in the Americas by creating a survival of the fittest environment where the europeans brought in diseases like smallpox that had plagued europe generations ago, but infected the native populations and weaken them in both their numbers and their strength, which enabled the Europeans to take control of the new world and develop a dominance while the natives were fighting a disease. This was “biological competition” because the Europeans' immunity was assisting them in fighting the natives' lack thereof.  

1.

In 1574, Akbar the emperor of the Subcontinent ordered his wazir to make a Katab-khana in the palace. This was to discover and reintroduce old texts. Books like Rajatarangini, Ramayana and Mahabharata were translated into different languages. One of these languages was Persian. After this many different old books both religious and non-religious were translated for the general public to read.

This was done to make different sects and religions stay united. His actions to a certain extent did eliminate disagreements between the people from different religions.

2.

Abu'l-Fazl ibn Mubarak was not the person behind Akbar's policies. It was actually his favorite wife named Mariam-uz-Zamani. She was a Hindu by birth. She was born at the house of Raja Bharmal of Amber. Later, when she grew up she was married to Akber. This marriage had political benefits. Jahangir was her son. She, however, did not play any political role in the Mughal court.  

She became more eminent after her son succeeded the throne. She was one of the most famous female traders of that time. Akbar after his marriage started his own religion called Din-e-ilahi.

3.

Many cultural and intellectual changes took place because of this interaction.  Collection of manuscripts from around the world and their critical study was introduced.  Changes in the economic system i.e trade also took place. Several changes in slavery were also seen. During this period, the trade of slaves became very eminent and a major source of income for many .Arabic art and literature started spreading in different South Asian regions. While people from those regions introduced new ways of living and rituals etc to Muslims.

In general, because of his numerous achievements, Akbar was awarded the epithet "the Great." The majority of Akbar's achievements military-related.         

Explanation:

One aspect in which Akbar's efforts in financing the translations stated in the text are comparable to rulers of other empires throughout the era 1450-1750 is that they both intended to improve their people's well-being by creating educational opportunities and religious books translations. During this time, Akbar and other monarchs aspired to translate sacred books in order to spread education, religion, and history. As well as to bring together Jewish, Hindu, and Muslim faiths in order to avoid future confrontations.

For more information, refer to the link:

link

Because the demand has gone up too, the bikes should gain more profit. Eventually there will be too many bikes produced and their value will drop.

By reading the above text, we can have a lot of information about the city of Quanzhou and Chinese trade. Based on this, we can answer the questions as follows:

1. One historical process that explains the religion of Srivijaya merchants in Quanzhou is the growth of maritime trade in that region. This trade promoted the passage of many different people, with different religions that influenced the local population. Among these religions, Mahayana Buddhism was one of the greatest influences.2. One aspect of China's economic development during the Song Dynasty was the establishment of international trade relations. During the Song Dynasty, China became involved in the global market and became a strong influence on international trade which attracted many buyers to its products and strengthened the economy.3. The purpose of the author of the text was to draw the attention of foreigners to show that Quanzhou had great commercial power and that commercial relations with that city were promising. For this reason, he shows plenty of praise for the city, as well as displaying its economic advantages.

More information:

link

In the 1850s, Chinese workers migrated to the United States, first to work in the gold mines, but also to take agricultural jobs, and factory work, especially in the garment industry. Chinese immigrants were particularly instrumental in building railroads in the American west, and as Chinese laborers grew successful in the United States, a number of them became entrepreneurs in their own right. As the numbers of Chinese laborers increased, so did the strength of anti-Chinese sentiment among other workers in the American economy. This finally resulted in legislation that aimed to limit future immigration of Chinese workers to the United States, and threatened to sour diplomatic relations between the United States and China.
Plz mark me brainliest!
Hope this helps!