Compose an essay that argues which health care system is better in terms of economics. Analyze the reasons for your determination

I think that the US healthcare system is the better in terms of economics because it is private and the wait time is shorter. The healthcare is private like Medicare and Medicaid which provide certain services to certain segments in US.Since they are private the workers and health facilities are also privet while in the UK they are public. Another plus of them being private is faster treatment and more advanced technologies, which in turn makes them very reliable to the US. This brings me to my next point on how the times for are shorter than the UK. In the UK sometimes people with have to wait months and maybe years to get certain treatments they need. In the US the wait time could be in a few days or a few weeks.

Hope its the works have a nice day :)

Explanation:

Have you ever wondered if your health care was effective? For years now both the United States and United Kingdoms have had their good and bad benefits which have been a cause for many of the recent changes to health care that they've experienced. We'll discuss how the economy and the government have effected the recent economy as well the benefits and drawbacks of these health care systems.

Both of these systems have their drawbacks however, the United States has recently made great strides to preserve and advance their healthcare system. The United States relies on insurance payments from their patients to allow for their doctors to allocate the release of newly developed drugs and technologies; these costly prices have led to money become scarce as many homeless or poor patients are unable to afford the costly price of health care. Many patients look to the quick response and the newly developed drugs and technologies that are not fully available in other countries. The health care in the United States is not controlled by the government and is instead influenced by the demand by the economy. Prices for health care are dependent upon how often a patient is admitted to the hospital it is also dependet upon the quality of insurance that is provided. A few of the benefits that you can expect is a speedy response as well as highly developed drugs and technologies. However, you can expect costly insurance bills as well as the rising increase in uninsured Americans. The benefits of producing health care produces include the increase of profits as there is an ever increasing competition between health care providers leading to better drugs. A disadvantage would be the constant overproduction of health care goods such as pain relievers which hurts the economy and producers. Although there are several disadvantages in health care the United States constistently provides modern and advanced medical treatment to all patients.

The U.K. on the other side provides free medical treatment for its citizens as opposed to the costly insurance of the United States. This however, comes with its downsides as advanced drugs and technologies are not available to the general public making them scarce as well as the government allocates or controls who needs medical attention immediately which leds to many people experiencing delays. One of the largest incentives for the peoples is that they have to pay little to no money for their medical visits which allows for all classes to recieve medical treatment. The government oversees who will recieve treatment as well as when they will recieve treatment, this of course leads to long wait periods between appointments. Prices are determined not by the market but rather by the government this means that most people can afford their perscriptions at a set price, this allows for most people to recieve moderately price perscriptions at a much lower price than in the United States. Consumers in the U.K. can expect to recieve some of the cheapest health care that a government can offer which allows for citizens to recieve needed medications and procedures. This however, means that delays and lengthy wait times are not uncommon as the government oversees its health care. Producers in the U.K. are able to sell most if not all of their productions and complete their proceedures, this is caused by the cheap price of medication which allows for more product to be sold. On the other side producers are not able to change their prices which can sometimes lead to the loss of profits. The health care in the U.K. seems to be advancing; however it is lacking in medical advancements and wait times for patients leaving many to have sub-part health care.

The United States as we have discussed is constantly making strides to further improve its health care as well as decrease the average cost for insurance therefore making health care more affordable to its citizens. They have continued to provide health care that is highly advanced and is readily available to most people seeking medical attention. In conclusion the United States is continueing towards a more affordable and effective health care system and the U.K. is lagging to create a health care system in which new drugs are readily available to its citizens.

Explanation:

I wouldn't recommend copying and pasting as they may link it back to this page but, all you need to do is put it into your own words.

I think that the US healthcare system is the better in terms of economics because it is private and the wait time is shorter. The healthcare is private like Medicare and Medicaid which provide certain services to certain segments in US.Since they are private the workers and health facilities are also privet while in the UK they are public. Another plus of them being private is faster treatment and more advanced technologies, which in turn makes them very reliable to the US. This brings me to my next point on how the times for are shorter than the UK. In the UK sometimes people with have to wait months and maybe years to get certain treatments they need. In the US the wait time could be in a few days or a few weeks.

Hope its the works have a nice day :)

Have you ever wondered if your health care was effective? For years now both the United States and United Kingdoms have had their good and bad benefits which have been a cause for many of the recent changes to health care that they've experienced. We'll discuss how the economy and the government have effected the recent economy as well the benefits and drawbacks of these health care systems.

Both of these systems have their drawbacks however, the United States has recently made great strides to preserve and advance their healthcare system. The United States relies on insurance payments from their patients to allow for their doctors to allocate the release of newly developed drugs and technologies; these costly prices have led to money become scarce as many homeless or poor patients are unable to afford the costly price of health care. Many patients look to the quick response and the newly developed drugs and technologies that are not fully available in other countries. The health care in the United States is not controlled by the government and is instead influenced by the demand by the economy. Prices for health care are dependent upon how often a patient is admitted to the hospital it is also dependet upon the quality of insurance that is provided. A few of the benefits that you can expect is a speedy response as well as highly developed drugs and technologies. However, you can expect costly insurance bills as well as the rising increase in uninsured Americans. The benefits of producing health care produces include the increase of profits as there is an ever increasing competition between health care providers leading to better drugs. A disadvantage would be the constant overproduction of health care goods such as pain relievers which hurts the economy and producers. Although there are several disadvantages in health care the United States constistently provides modern and advanced medical treatment to all patients.

The U.K. on the other side provides free medical treatment for its citizens as opposed to the costly insurance of the United States. This however, comes with its downsides as advanced drugs and technologies are not available to the general public making them scarce as well as the government allocates or controls who needs medical attention immediately which leds to many people experiencing delays. One of the largest incentives for the peoples is that they have to pay little to no money for their medical visits which allows for all classes to recieve medical treatment. The government oversees who will recieve treatment as well as when they will recieve treatment, this of course leads to long wait periods between appointments. Prices are determined not by the market but rather by the government this means that most people can afford their perscriptions at a set price, this allows for most people to recieve moderately price perscriptions at a much lower price than in the United States. Consumers in the U.K. can expect to recieve some of the cheapest health care that a government can offer which allows for citizens to recieve needed medications and procedures. This however, means that delays and lengthy wait times are not uncommon as the government oversees its health care. Producers in the U.K. are able to sell most if not all of their productions and complete their proceedures, this is caused by the cheap price of medication which allows for more product to be sold. On the other side producers are not able to change their prices which can sometimes lead to the loss of profits. The health care in the U.K. seems to be advancing; however it is lacking in medical advancements and wait times for patients leaving many to have sub-part health care.

The United States as we have discussed is constantly making strides to further improve its health care as well as decrease the average cost for insurance therefore making health care more affordable to its citizens. They have continued to provide health care that is highly advanced and is readily available to most people seeking medical attention. In conclusion the United States is continueing towards a more affordable and effective health care system and the U.K. is lagging to create a health care system in which new drugs are readily available to its citizens.

Explanation:

I wouldn't recommend copying and pasting as they may link it back to this page but, all you need to do is put it into your own words.

I think that the US healthcare system is the better in terms of economics because it is private and the wait time is shorter. The healthcare is private like Medicare and Medicaid which provide certain services to certain segments in US.Since they are private the workers and health facilities are also privet while in the UK they are public. Another plus of them being private is faster treatment and more advanced technologies, which in turn makes them very reliable to the US. This brings me to my next point on how the times for are shorter than the UK. In the UK sometimes people with have to wait months and maybe years to get certain treatments they need. In the US the wait time could be in a few days or a few weeks.

Hope its the works have a nice day :)

Explanation:

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Unfortunately, you did not include the two maps. Without them, we do not know your specific reference.

However, trying to help you and after doing some deep research, we can say the maps portray the Spanish, British, and Dutch trade maritime routes from 1750 to 1850. The other map shows the many trade routes in 2010 that practically crossed all over the world.

That is why we can answer that one significant reason for changes in the patterns of global economic interactions from circa 1750 to circa 2000, as illustrated by the two maps are the technology and modernization of means of transportation that today include land, air, and sea.

Trade has been the activity that has developed most rapidly all over the world in those years. Today, there are international organizations and free trade agreements that connect the world through trade.

More people on the planet started to require more products from all places and developed nations exploited natural resources and raw materials and produced more and better goods in their industrialized cities that were exported.

see explanation and i got an a btw.

Explanation:

b. The development of diseases in the sixteenth century would support the arguments of the “new generation of historians in the second paragraph because the “new generation of historians” would look at this in relation to european imperialism and see the impact of the european diseases like smallpox that would plague places like modern day united states because of the european immunity, but lack of native immunity.  

c. The “biological competition” contributed to the European imperialism in the Americas by creating a survival of the fittest environment where the europeans brought in diseases like smallpox that had plagued europe generations ago, but infected the native populations and weaken them in both their numbers and their strength, which enabled the Europeans to take control of the new world and develop a dominance while the natives were fighting a disease. This was “biological competition” because the Europeans' immunity was assisting them in fighting the natives' lack thereof.  

1.

In 1574, Akbar the emperor of the Subcontinent ordered his wazir to make a Katab-khana in the palace. This was to discover and reintroduce old texts. Books like Rajatarangini, Ramayana and Mahabharata were translated into different languages. One of these languages was Persian. After this many different old books both religious and non-religious were translated for the general public to read.

This was done to make different sects and religions stay united. His actions to a certain extent did eliminate disagreements between the people from different religions.

2.

Abu'l-Fazl ibn Mubarak was not the person behind Akbar's policies. It was actually his favorite wife named Mariam-uz-Zamani. She was a Hindu by birth. She was born at the house of Raja Bharmal of Amber. Later, when she grew up she was married to Akber. This marriage had political benefits. Jahangir was her son. She, however, did not play any political role in the Mughal court.  

3.

A) Ethnic divisions hindered the development of land-based empires in the period 1450-1750. For example, the Manchu people in the Qing Dynasty in China sought to preserve their ethnic values while ruling China, which proved to be an obstacle for them to rule the vast majority of Han Chinese.

B) Ethnic divisions also hindered the development of maritime empires in the period 1450-1750. For example, the ethnic division between the French colonists and the Haitian people led to multiple Haitian rebellions and ultimately the Haitian Revolution against France.

C) Many land-based empires and maritime empires institutionalized hierarchical distinctions amongst different ethnic groups, often with the use of slavery. The European colonists, for instance, made African Americans the lowest class in American society by enslaving them. Similarly, Christians under Ottoman rule are recruited as janissaries. In both examples, the ruling class adopted policies that limit the social mobility of the ethnic groups that are alien to themselves.