Answer:
Answer explained in detail below.Step-by-step explanation:
• The historical context surrounding documents 1 and 2 is the era of Prohibition in the United States. Document 1 is a section of the 18th Amendment to the US Constitution, which was ratified in 1919 and went into effect in 1920, prohibiting the manufacture, sale, and transportation of alcohol for beverage purposes. Document 2 is an article written in November 1925, during the Prohibition era, by a businessman named Richard H. Scott. Scott's article reflects the economic and social impact of Prohibition on American businesses and consumers.
• Document 2 is a biased source that reflects the point of view of a businessman who supported Prohibition. The purpose of the article is to demonstrate the economic benefits of Prohibition and refute the arguments of Prohibition opponents who predicted disaster. The audience of the article is likely other businesspeople who may have been skeptical of Prohibition's economic impact. The article uses selective evidence and omits any negative consequences of Prohibition, such as the rise of organized crime and bootlegging, and the loss of tax revenue for the government.
While Document 2 may provide some insight into the economic impact of Prohibition, it should be used with caution as a reliable source of evidence. The article is not a comprehensive analysis of the effects of Prohibition and reflects only the perspective of a specific group of people who benefited from the law. Additionally, the article's bias and selective use of evidence may lead to an incomplete or inaccurate understanding of Prohibition's impact.