500 words: Single space, 12 font size, standard margins.


By now you have the skills to go look at art on your own and the tools to analyze and discuss what you see. While you are home on break or when you return to Charleston, your task is to go out and look at art in a gallery or museum. Not necessary to spend money here, there are many free options. For example, in Charleston visit the Halsey, Redux or any of the commercial galleries downtown. If your hometown has an art museum and you visit over break that’s another great option.



For this paper, you will select a work that you see (modern or contemporary, created AFTER 1900) to focus on. Take a picture and include a small jpeg with your paper so that I can also see the work.


Remember our first paper? In the same way, the first thing is to write a formal analysis of your chosen work, discussing its features, style characteristics, what it is made from, how large it is, etc. Why did you choose it, what struck you about it visually?


Next, analyze your chosen work in comparison/contrast with other works encountered in class lectures and the textbook. Here, you are contextualizing your chosen work within the larger history of art. How does it line up with modern or contemporary art that we’ve been learning about? Make connections, relate it to what you know about art of this era, demonstrate that you can discuss the work in a larger frame.


This paper prompts you to apply what you’ve learned to art in the real world, and developing the habit of looking at art even after the class is over
**would prefer if it's from the museum in North Carolina Raleigh and a piece that is colorful**

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Unfortunately, you did not include the two maps. Without them, we do not know your specific reference.

However, trying to help you and after doing some deep research, we can say the maps portray the Spanish, British, and Dutch trade maritime routes from 1750 to 1850. The other map shows the many trade routes in 2010 that practically crossed all over the world.

That is why we can answer that one significant reason for changes in the patterns of global economic interactions from circa 1750 to circa 2000, as illustrated by the two maps are the technology and modernization of means of transportation that today include land, air, and sea.

Trade has been the activity that has developed most rapidly all over the world in those years. Today, there are international organizations and free trade agreements that connect the world through trade.

More people on the planet started to require more products from all places and developed nations exploited natural resources and raw materials and produced more and better goods in their industrialized cities that were exported.

see explanation and i got an a btw.

Explanation:

b. The development of diseases in the sixteenth century would support the arguments of the “new generation of historians in the second paragraph because the “new generation of historians” would look at this in relation to european imperialism and see the impact of the european diseases like smallpox that would plague places like modern day united states because of the european immunity, but lack of native immunity.  

c. The “biological competition” contributed to the European imperialism in the Americas by creating a survival of the fittest environment where the europeans brought in diseases like smallpox that had plagued europe generations ago, but infected the native populations and weaken them in both their numbers and their strength, which enabled the Europeans to take control of the new world and develop a dominance while the natives were fighting a disease. This was “biological competition” because the Europeans' immunity was assisting them in fighting the natives' lack thereof.  

1.

In 1574, Akbar the emperor of the Subcontinent ordered his wazir to make a Katab-khana in the palace. This was to discover and reintroduce old texts. Books like Rajatarangini, Ramayana and Mahabharata were translated into different languages. One of these languages was Persian. After this many different old books both religious and non-religious were translated for the general public to read.

This was done to make different sects and religions stay united. His actions to a certain extent did eliminate disagreements between the people from different religions.

2.

Abu'l-Fazl ibn Mubarak was not the person behind Akbar's policies. It was actually his favorite wife named Mariam-uz-Zamani. She was a Hindu by birth. She was born at the house of Raja Bharmal of Amber. Later, when she grew up she was married to Akber. This marriage had political benefits. Jahangir was her son. She, however, did not play any political role in the Mughal court.  

3.

A) Ethnic divisions hindered the development of land-based empires in the period 1450-1750. For example, the Manchu people in the Qing Dynasty in China sought to preserve their ethnic values while ruling China, which proved to be an obstacle for them to rule the vast majority of Han Chinese.

B) Ethnic divisions also hindered the development of maritime empires in the period 1450-1750. For example, the ethnic division between the French colonists and the Haitian people led to multiple Haitian rebellions and ultimately the Haitian Revolution against France.

C) Many land-based empires and maritime empires institutionalized hierarchical distinctions amongst different ethnic groups, often with the use of slavery. The European colonists, for instance, made African Americans the lowest class in American society by enslaving them. Similarly, Christians under Ottoman rule are recruited as janissaries. In both examples, the ruling class adopted policies that limit the social mobility of the ethnic groups that are alien to themselves.

By reading the above text, we can have a lot of information about the city of Quanzhou and Chinese trade. Based on this, we can answer the questions as follows:

More information:

link

1. Mahoney states that "the needs of speakers drive language change" (nsf.gov).

5. Johnson claims that the English language began to deviate from its Germanic origins (4).

6. In the eighteenth century, English was "departing from its original Teutonick character"(Johnson 4).