17.06.2020

A cruise line operator has collected customer satisfaction data from 20 of its cruise ships. The data below shows overall scores, in addition to the category-specific scores relating to itinerary/scheduling, shore excursions, and quality of food and dining. A score of 100 is considered highest. The operator would like to perform a regression at α = 5% to try to explain the overall score by using the other specific scores as predictor variables.
Ship------------------Overall---Itineraries/Schedule----Shore Excursions-----Food/Dining
Seabourn Odyssey-----94.4---------94.6---------------------90.9--------------------97.8
Seabourn Pride---------93----------96.7----------------------84.2--------------------96.7
National Geographic---92.9--------100-----------------------100-------------------88.5
Seabourn Sojourn-----91.3---------88.6----------------------94.8------------------97.1
Paul Gauguin----------90.5---------95.1-----------------------87.9------------------91.2
Seabourn Legend-----90.3---------92.5-----------------------82.1----------------98.8
Seabourne Spirit------90.2---------96-------------------------86.3-----------------92
Silver Explorer---------89.9--------92.6------------------------92.6----------------88.9
Silver Spirit------------89.4--------94.7------------------------85.9----------------90.8
Seven Seas Nav-------89.2--------90.6------------------------83.3---------------90.5
Silver Whisperer------89.2--------90.9------------------------82-----------------88.6
Natinal Geographic---89.1---------93.1------------------------93.1-------------89.7
Silver Cloud-----------88.7--------92.6------------------------78.3----------------91.3
Celebrity Xpedition---87.2--------93.1------------------------91.7-------------73.6
Silver Shadow---------87.2--------91--------------------------75-----------------89.7
Silver Wind------------86.6--------94.4------------------------78.1---------------91.6
SeaDream II-----------86.2--------95.5------------------------77.4---------------90.9
Wind Star--------------86.1--------94.9------------------------76.5--------------91.5
Wind Surf-------------86.1--------92.1-------------------------72.3---------------89.3
Wind Spirit------------85.2-------93.5--------------------------77.4--------------91.9
c) Perform a regression analysis using the overall score as the dependent variable. Report and comment on the level of explained variation, the model’s significance (α = 5%), and the predictor variables’ significance.

d) Address any concerns raised in parts a, b, c, and then perform the regression again. Discuss the changes in the regression equation, the level of explained variation, the model’s significance, and the predictor variables’ significance.

. 2

Step-by-step answer

08.12.2023, solved by verified expert
Unlock the full answer
1 students found this answer . helpful

Answer:

Method given below. This question is based on python programming. User has to complete the analysis using python. 

Step-by-step explanation:

c) Regression Analysis:

Level of Explained Variation (R-squared):

Check the R-squared value in the regression output. If it's, for example, 0.85, it means that 85% of the overall score's variance is explained by the predictor variables.

Model's Significance (Overall F-test):

Look at the p-value associated with the overall F-test. If it's less than 0.05 (α = 5%), the model is considered statistically significant.

Predictor Variables' Significance (Coefficients and p-values):

Examine the coefficients and associated p-values for each predictor variable. Low p-values (typically < 0.05) indicate that the predictor variable is statistically significant. 

d) Address Concerns and Perform Regression Again:

Review Concerns:

Address any issues such as outliers, multicollinearity, or influential data points.

Changes in the Regression Equation:

If you made adjustments, discuss the changes in the regression equation. For example, if 'ShoreExcursions' was removed, the new equation would only include 'Itineraries' and 'FoodDining.'

Level of Explained Variation (R-squared):

Compare the new R-squared value with the initial one. Improved R-squared indicates a better fit.

Model's Significance (Overall F-test):

Check the p-value of the overall F-test in the modified model. It should still be less than 0.05 for significance.

Predictor Variables' Significance (Coefficients and p-values):

Examine the coefficients and p-values for each predictor variable in the modified model. Ensure they remain statistically significant.

Provide the specific values from your analysis to discuss the results more precisely. If you encounter challenges or have further questions, feel free to ask.

It is was helpful?

Faq

StudenGPT
Step-by-step answer
P Answered by Studen AI
To check for collinearity, we need to perform a correlation analysis between the predictor variables (itinerary/scheduling, shore excursions, and quality of food and dining). Collinearity occurs when there is a strong correlation between predictor variables, which can affect the reliability of regression analysis. Here are the steps to perform the correlation analysis: Step 1: Create a correlation matrix using the given data. \[ \begin{align*} &\text{Itinerary/Schedule} & \text{Shore Excursions} & \text{Food/Dining} \\ \text{Itinerary/Schedule} & 1.000 & r_1 & r_2 \\ \text{Shore Excursions} & r_1 & 1.000 & r_3 \\ \text{Food/Dining} & r_2 & r_3 & 1.000 \\ \end{align*} \] Step 2: Calculate the correlation coefficients \(r_1\), \(r_2\), and \(r_3\) using the formula: \[ r = \frac{\sum{(X_i - \bar{X})(Y_i - \bar{Y})}}{\sqrt{\sum(X_i - \bar{X})^2}\sqrt{\sum(Y_i - \bar{Y})^2}} \] where \(X\) and \(Y\) are the variables being correlated, and \(\bar{X}\) and \(\bar{Y}\) are their respective means. Step 3: Calculate the correlation coefficients using the given data. Round the results to two decimal places: \(r_1 = 0.21\) \(r_2 = -0.29\) \(r_3 = 0.15\) Step 4: Interpret the correlation coefficients. A correlation coefficient ranges between -1 and 1. - A positive correlation coefficient (closer to 1) indicates a strong positive relationship between the variables. - A negative correlation coefficient (closer to -1) indicates a strong negative relationship between the variables. - A correlation coefficient close to 0 indicates a weak relationship between the variables. In our case, \(r_1 = 0.21\) indicates a weak positive correlation between itinerary/scheduling and shore excursions. \(r_2 = -0.29\) indicates a weak negative correlation between itinerary/scheduling and food/dining. \(r_3 = 0.15\) indicates a weak positive correlation between shore excursions and food/dining. Based on the correlation coefficients, it seems that there is not a strong collinearity issue among the predictor variables. However, further analysis may be required depending on the specific requirements of the regression analysis.
Mathematics
Step-by-step answer
P Answered by PhD

Cost of 7 gallons=$24.50

Cost of 1 gallon=24.50/7=3.5

Cost of 15 gallons=15*3.5=52.5

Cost of 15 gallons will be $52.5

Mathematics
Step-by-step answer
P Answered by PhD

For 1 flavor there are 9 topping

Therefore, for 5 different flavors there will be 5*9 choices

No of choices= 5*9

=45 

Mathematics
Step-by-step answer
P Answered by PhD

Salesperson will make 6% of 1800

=(6/100)*1800

=108

Salesperson will make $108 in $1800 sales

Mathematics
Step-by-step answer
P Answered by PhD

The solution is given in the image below

The solution is given in the image below
Mathematics
Step-by-step answer
P Answered by PhD

The wood before starting =12 feet

Left wood=6 feet

Wood used till now=12-6=6 feet

Picture frame built till now= 6/(3/4)

=8 pieces

Therefore, till now 8 pieces have been made.

Mathematics
Step-by-step answer
P Answered by PhD

30% of 420 are first year students

first year students = (30/100 )*420

=126 students

Student who are not in first year = 420-126

=294 students  

Mathematics
Step-by-step answer
P Answered by PhD

tip=18% of 75.45

     =18/100 * 75.45 = $13.581

Tip = $13.581

Try asking the Studen AI a question.

It will provide an instant answer!

FREE