The correct answer is B) To emphasize the emotional impact of this tragic loss of life.
This pause is commonly used by high commanders to express their condolescenses in a respectful and brief way. In society, it is oftentimes known as 'a moment of silence' that represents silent contemplation, reflection and is mainly a gesture of respect, particularly in mourning for those who have died recently.
The correct answer is B) To emphasize the emotional impact of this tragic loss of life.
This pause is commonly used by high commanders to express their condolescenses in a respectful and brief way. In society, it is oftentimes known as 'a moment of silence' that represents silent contemplation, reflection and is mainly a gesture of respect, particularly in mourning for those who have died recently.
The correct answer is option letter B (expository). Both statements present facts about one topic, the disappearing bee colonies in the United States. Expository texts are fact-based texts and their main function is to inform the reader. They are usually found in articles, reports, and essays. In fact, Statement 1 can be found in an article from CNN Money (Disappearing bees threaten ice cream sellers). This type of texts supports the information presented with evidence about the topic in order to fulfill their function. Both statements expose not only information about the bee colonies but also supporting sentences that enrich the text. For instance, the following statement: “Without this army of migrant pollinators paying a visit for three weeks every year, the trees would fail to bear the almonds that are California's most valuable horticultural export.”. The statements are not narrative, since it would implicate telling a story and this is not the case. They are not descriptive, since the texts do not describe the bee colonies or who they disappeared. Finally, the statements are not about facts and opinions, or persuasive, since they do not present any opinion from the author. Only facts are exposed.
Based on paragraphs 5, 6, and 7 of the passage, the author's main idea is that investing in public school choice programs can be a good compromise to address the issue of inadequate funding for schools in low-income neighborhoods. These programs can provide alternative public school options for low-income students and parents, allowing them to determine if an alternative public school would better suit their needs and aspirations.
In paragraph 5, the author introduces the idea of investing in public school choice programs as an alternative to private school choice options. The author highlights that carefully managed public school choice programs can serve students well and promote social goods such as racial or socioeconomic integration.
Moving on to paragraph 6, the author elaborates on the benefits of public school choice programs, giving examples like vocational schools, alternative schools for dropouts, and dual-language public schools. These programs can meet the diverse needs of students and communities, contributing to their overall education and success.
Paragraph 7 further emphasizes the advantages of public school choice programs. It suggests that by focusing on and investing in these programs, education funding can be retained within the public school system instead of being diverted to private schools. Low-income students and parents can then have the opportunity to choose an alternative public school that aligns with their preferences and educational goals.
In summary, the author argues that public school choice programs can provide a viable solution to the issue of inadequate funding in low-income neighborhoods. These programs can offer students and parents choices within the public school system, ultimately enhancing access to quality education and improving educational outcomes.
Get rid of B. That speech was a declaration of war -- which was the main purpose of it being given. Feeling safe was no longer an option.
A: A might be your second best answer. The attack on Pearl was not the only event that happened. There were 7 others listed. (The sinking of ships between San Francisco and Honolulu also counts as a military act of aggression).
C: The speech did exactly that. See A above. But if that was all it did, it would have been forgotten in the dust bin of history. I wouldn't pick that.
D: there is nothing there that even hints at "I told you so." Leave D. In fact the opposite is true.
I don't know what you should answer. Roosevelt was angry that he was deceived along with the rest of America. I suppose I would pick A. But the question is very poor in my opinion.
A but don't be surprised if it is C which would be an outrage.
The correct option is this: THE SPEAKER FEELS NO TIME CAN BE LOST PONDERING ACTION WITH SUCH A THREAT. From the excerpt given above, it can be seen that Japan had surprisingly attacked USA, while giving them false hope that they intend to be at peace with USA. With all the surprising moves of Japan, the speaker is saying in the excerpt above that, no time should be lost in tackling Japan in order to stop the onslaught on USA.
0
4 203
rating
Get help with homework
