Answer:
Answer explained below.Step-by-step explanation:
Jefferson acknowledged that the possibility of future governments overturning laws was a legitimate concern, but he argued that the principles of democracy and the people's ability to protect their own rights would prevent this from happening. He wrote:
"I do not say whether they would be wrong or right in resuming the power they once delegated, but I say it is not necessary to resort to that expedient. The good sense of the people will always be found to be the best army. They may be led astray for a moment, but will soon correct themselves. The people are the only censors of their governors: and even their errors will tend to keep these to the true principles of their institution."
In other words, Jefferson believed that while it was possible for future governments to make mistakes or act in ways that infringe upon individual rights, the democratic process and the good sense of the people would ultimately prevail, and they would correct any errors or abuses of power. He trusted in the ability of the people to hold their leaders accountable and ensure that their rights were protected. Therefore, Jefferson did not propose any specific safeguards to prevent a future General Assembly from overturning the Virginia Statute for Religious Freedom, but rather he believed that the people's vigilance and commitment to democracy would be sufficient to protect their rights.