Something is plagiarism if one takes material from another source and uses it without pointing toward that source, thus making it appear that it is originally written.
1. No, this is not plagiarism since she herself is the original writer, thus she is not stealing content from anybody else.
2. According to Casey Berry of Sciences Ltd., "Only 6% of students wash their hands after class." This first choice is not plagiarism, since the student has cited the researcher Casey Berry, and has enclosed the directly copied statement in quotation marks. In contrast, the second choice mentions "a recent study" without any direct mention of who did the study, and it copies the conclusion verbatim without using quotation marks.
3. This is not plagiarism, since she places a hyperlink to the source, thus acknowledging that what she has written is not her own original material. However, this is considered bad practice, to simply link to a source without describing what it has done or which parts specifically you have taken from it. You would not probably be sued in court for plagiarism, but it is still advisable to describe what the source has done.
4. No, this is not plagiarism. He has used quotation marks for direct quotes. The paraphrased information does not need quotation marks. Hyperlinks and attributions have been provided for each, so there are no issues with this kind of writing.
5. Yes, this is plagiarism. The BlogMutt writer got information from another post (which may or may not have been original material, we do not know), and did not attribute that post. Furthermore, this write-up is for a customer, not merely for discussion in forums, so pretending that the information on the post is his own is not only plagiarism, but it is also business dishonesty as he is stealing someone's work and selling it to a customer as his own.
Something is plagiarism if one takes material from another source and uses it without pointing toward that source, thus making it appear that it is originally written.
1. No, this is not plagiarism since she herself is the original writer, thus she is not stealing content from anybody else.
2. According to Casey Berry of Sciences Ltd., "Only 6% of students wash their hands after class." This first choice is not plagiarism, since the student has cited the researcher Casey Berry, and has enclosed the directly copied statement in quotation marks. In contrast, the second choice mentions "a recent study" without any direct mention of who did the study, and it copies the conclusion verbatim without using quotation marks.
3. This is not plagiarism, since she places a hyperlink to the source, thus acknowledging that what she has written is not her own original material. However, this is considered bad practice, to simply link to a source without describing what it has done or which parts specifically you have taken from it. You would not probably be sued in court for plagiarism, but it is still advisable to describe what the source has done.
4. No, this is not plagiarism. He has used quotation marks for direct quotes. The paraphrased information does not need quotation marks. Hyperlinks and attributions have been provided for each, so there are no issues with this kind of writing.
5. Yes, this is plagiarism. The BlogMutt writer got information from another post (which may or may not have been original material, we do not know), and did not attribute that post. Furthermore, this write-up is for a customer, not merely for discussion in forums, so pretending that the information on the post is his own is not only plagiarism, but it is also business dishonesty as he is stealing someone's work and selling it to a customer as his own.
See explanations for step to step procedure to answer.
Step-by-step explanation:
A publisher knows that from all the writers the company published, 20% wrote romantic novels and 40% wrote sci-fi books. If we look at the last 5 years, 40% published 2 books, and 30% published only 1 book. From the writers that did not published in the last 5 years, 20% wrote romantic novels and 40% sci-fi books. From the writers that wrote other types of books, 50% published 2 books. Finally, the number of sci-fi writers that published 1 and the number that published 2 books was the same. 1. What is the average number of books published in the last five years? 2. What proportion of writers are sci-fi writers and published 2 books during the last five years? 3. What is the probability that if we choose a romantic novels writer, he had not published in the last five years? 4. What is the probability that a writer did not publish romantic or sci-fi and did not publish exactly 1 book in the past five years? 5. If we select a writer that had published in the last five years, what is the probability that he writes romantic novels? 6. If we select 5 writers, what is the probability that they didn't publish any books in the past 5 years? 7. What is the probability that a writer is not a romantic novel writer and published more than 1 book in the past five years? 8. Are types of books and the number of books published in the past five years statistically independent? 9. Is writing sci-fi books and not publishing in the last years statistically independent? 10. What is the probability that if we choose 4 writers, 2 of them have published 1 romantic novel in the last 5 years? 11. What proportion of writers did not write sci-fi and published one or two books?
See attachment for additional steps to get answers
See explanations for step to step procedure to answer.
Step-by-step explanation:
A publisher knows that from all the writers the company published, 20% wrote romantic novels and 40% wrote sci-fi books. If we look at the last 5 years, 40% published 2 books, and 30% published only 1 book. From the writers that did not published in the last 5 years, 20% wrote romantic novels and 40% sci-fi books. From the writers that wrote other types of books, 50% published 2 books. Finally, the number of sci-fi writers that published 1 and the number that published 2 books was the same. 1. What is the average number of books published in the last five years? 2. What proportion of writers are sci-fi writers and published 2 books during the last five years? 3. What is the probability that if we choose a romantic novels writer, he had not published in the last five years? 4. What is the probability that a writer did not publish romantic or sci-fi and did not publish exactly 1 book in the past five years? 5. If we select a writer that had published in the last five years, what is the probability that he writes romantic novels? 6. If we select 5 writers, what is the probability that they didn't publish any books in the past 5 years? 7. What is the probability that a writer is not a romantic novel writer and published more than 1 book in the past five years? 8. Are types of books and the number of books published in the past five years statistically independent? 9. Is writing sci-fi books and not publishing in the last years statistically independent? 10. What is the probability that if we choose 4 writers, 2 of them have published 1 romantic novel in the last 5 years? 11. What proportion of writers did not write sci-fi and published one or two books?
See attachment for additional steps to get answers
Every time I teach “Writing for Children” at a writers conference or teach a “Children’s Writing 101” class at a university, I'm asked some of the same questions, so I’ve decided to address five of the most common myths surrounding this genre. They say “the truth shall set you free,” so get ready to experience some freedom in this blog. Number one:MYTH: Writing books for children is much easier than writing books for adults.TRUTH: Good writing is tough no matter what genre we’re talking about; however, writing for children can be one of the most difficult to master and one of the most difficult to break into—but you can do it! MORE TO PONDER…You have to say a lot in so few words—must make every single word count!You must be selective in word choice so that each word matches grade level. (Get a copy of the “Children’s Writer’s Word Book” by Alijandra Mogilner, published by Writer’s Digest Books.)t’s highly competitive! (The average national publisher receives 6,000 -15,000 unsolicited manuscripts a year, and of those, they publish 2-3. The rest of the books they publish come from agents, from authors they’re already publishing, and from other authors they meet at conferences.) But, you can do it!!!
Every time I teach “Writing for Children” at a writers conference or teach a “Children’s Writing 101” class at a university, I'm asked some of the same questions, so I’ve decided to address five of the most common myths surrounding this genre. They say “the truth shall set you free,” so get ready to experience some freedom in this blog. Number one:MYTH: Writing books for children is much easier than writing books for adults.TRUTH: Good writing is tough no matter what genre we’re talking about; however, writing for children can be one of the most difficult to master and one of the most difficult to break into—but you can do it! MORE TO PONDER…You have to say a lot in so few words—must make every single word count!You must be selective in word choice so that each word matches grade level. (Get a copy of the “Children’s Writer’s Word Book” by Alijandra Mogilner, published by Writer’s Digest Books.)t’s highly competitive! (The average national publisher receives 6,000 -15,000 unsolicited manuscripts a year, and of those, they publish 2-3. The rest of the books they publish come from agents, from authors they’re already publishing, and from other authors they meet at conferences.) But, you can do it!!!
10
13 074
rating
Get help with homework
