04.06.2023

Your response to this assignment can be a real exchange or it can by hypothetical. The most important thing is that you demonstrate that you have put thought into your discussion and integrate concepts from the course to date.

Suppose that (choose either of these two scenarios):

Scenario One:

Someone you know asked you what courses you are taking, and when you responded “Psychology”, they asked, “Well...what have you learned?” {Did this actually happen at Thanksgiving?!}
Present a one-page paper where you choose three things that stick out to you about this semester so far (regarding content in this course). When you answer the person who asked the question, they will obviously say, “tell me about it”. So… briefly describe each topic, why you feel it was important enough to stick out to you, and why specifically we would cover it in a psychology class (thinking back to our definition of psychology)
Scenario Two:

You meet someone who tells you that they are currently taking college courses. You ask what they are taking, and they respond, “Psychology”. Being the extra-smart psychology student that you, yourself are, think of three specific concepts that you’d like to ask your colleague about.
Present a one-page paper where you discuss the three questions that you would ask this person. In other words, thinking back to all we have studied, what are three things that you think any student of psychology should have learned. Briefly explain each, as well as why you think these are crucial for psychology content, and how they have real-life application.


After you have edited and spell-checked your paper, upload through Canvas by the deadline.

. 0

Step-by-step answer

28.11.2023, solved by verified expert
Unlock the full answer
1 students found this answer . helpful

Answer:

Answer explained below.

Step-by-step explanation:

Scenario Two: 

Questions for a Psychology Colleague

As a psychology enthusiast, I often find myself engaged in conversations about the fascinating realm of the mind. Recently, I encountered someone taking psychology courses, providing me with the perfect opportunity to delve into discussions about the core concepts they might have encountered. Here are three questions I would ask my colleague and why I consider these concepts crucial in the field of psychology.

1. Nature vs. Nurture Debate:
  -Brief Explanation: This concept explores the age-old debate surrounding the relative influence of genetics (nature) and the environment (nurture) on human behavior and development.
  - Significance : Understanding this debate is vital as it forms the foundation for comprehending the complexity of human behavior. It prompts us to question the origins of traits and behaviors, acknowledging the interplay between genetic predispositions and environmental factors.
  - Real-life Application: Recognizing the impact of both nature and nurture has implications in various fields, from education to mental health. It helps inform interventions and policies that aim to optimize individual potential while considering environmental factors.

2. Classical Conditioning:
  - Brief Explanation: A fundamental concept introduced by Ivan Pavlov, classical conditioning involves associating a neutral stimulus with an involuntary response through repeated pairings.
  - Significance: Classical conditioning highlights the ways in which organisms learn through associations. It's a cornerstone in behavioral psychology, illustrating how seemingly unrelated stimuli can become linked in the mind.
  - Real-life Application: This concept is prevalent in everyday life, from advertising strategies to therapeutic interventions. Understanding classical conditioning provides insights into how habits are formed, phobias develop, and therapeutic techniques can be applied to modify behavior.

3. Cognitive Dissonance:
  - Brief Explanation: Proposed by Leon Festinger, cognitive dissonance refers to the discomfort experienced when holding conflicting beliefs or attitudes, leading individuals to resolve the inconsistency.
  - Significance: Cognitive dissonance is essential in understanding how individuals strive for mental consistency. It sheds light on the discomfort people feel when faced with conflicting information and the cognitive processes involved in resolving such conflicts.
  - Real-life Application: Recognizing cognitive dissonance is crucial in fields such as persuasion, decision-making, and conflict resolution. It explains why people may change their beliefs or attitudes to align with new information, impacting various aspects of social and personal interactions.

So, we can conclude that these three concepts - the nature vs. nurture debate, classical conditioning, and cognitive dissonance - are pivotal in the field of psychology. They not only provide a solid foundation for understanding human behavior but also offer practical insights with real-life applications. As we delve into the intricacies of the mind, these concepts serve as guiding principles for comprehending and navigating the complexities of the human psyche.

It is was helpful?

Faq

Physics
Step-by-step answer
P Answered by Specialist
Options:
a. a lower frequency and a shorter wavelength.
b. a higher frequency and a longer wavelength.
c. a lower frequency and a longer wavelength.
d. a higher frequency and a shorter wavelength

Answer:
d. a higher frequency and a shorter wavelength

Explanation:
The frequency of a wave is inversely proportional to its wavelength. That means that waves with a high frequency have a short wavelength, while waves with a low frequency have a longer wavelength. Light waves have very, very short wavelengths.
For example, Gamma rays have the highest energies, the shortest wavelengths, and the highest frequencies. Radio waves, on the other hand, have the lowest energies, longest wavelengths, and lowest frequencies of any type of EM radiation.
Options:
a. a lower frequency and a shorter wavelength.
b. a higher frequency and a longer wavelen
Physics
Step-by-step answer
P Answered by Specialist
Answer: Option B and C are True.

Explanation:
The weight of the two blocks acts downwards.
Let the weight of the two blocks be W. Solving for T₁ and T₂:
w = T₁/cos 60° -----(1);
w = T₂/cos 30° ----(2);
equating (1) and (2)
T₁/cos 60° = T₂/cos 30°;
T₁ cos 30° = T₂ cos 60°;
T₂/T₁ = cos 30°/cos 60°;
T₂/T₁ =1.73.
Therefore, option a is false since T₂ > T₁.
Option B is true since T₁ cos 30° = T₂ cos 60°.
Option C is true because the T₃ is due to the weight of the two blocks while T₄ is only due to one block.
Option D is wrong because T₁ + T₂ > T₃ by simple summation of the two forces, except by vector addition.
Answer: Option B and C are True.

Explanation:  
The weight of the two blocks acts downwards.
Le
Physics
Step-by-step answer
P Answered by PhD

Answer:

9.6 meters

Step-by-step explanation:

Time taken by the tomatoes to each the ground

using h = 1/2 g t^2 

t^2 = 2h/g = 2 x 50/ 9.8 = 10.2

t = 3.2 sec 

horizontal ditance = speed x time = 3 x 3.2 = 9.6 meters

Physics
Step-by-step answer
P Answered by PhD

The question specifies the diameter of the screw, therefore the IMA of this screw is 0.812? / 0.318 = 8.02

Physics
Step-by-step answer
P Answered by PhD
Answer:
7.25 secs.

Explanation:
First find the distance it takes to stop
s = [v^2-u^2]/2a = 0^2 - 8.7^2/2[-2.4] = 8.7^2/4.8
Next find the time it takes to go that distance , s = ut +[1/2] at^2
8.7^2/4.8 = 8.7t +[1/2] [ -2.4]t^2 , rearrange and
t^2 -[8.7/1.2]+ 8.7^2/[(1.2)(4.8)]=0 complete the square
[t - (8.7/2.4)]^2=0
t = 8.7/2.4 = 3.625 secs
At this stage the deceleration will push the object back in the direction it came from for another 3.625 secs when it will be 8.7 m/s again
Total time , T =2t = 7.25 secs.

Note:
The term differential is used in calculus to refer to an infinitesimal (infinitely small) change in some varying quantity. For example, if x is a variable, then a change in the value of x is often denoted Δx (pronounced delta x). The differential dx represents an infinitely small change in the variable x.
Physics
Step-by-step answer
P Answered by PhD
First sum applied the Newton's second law motion: F = ma
Force = mass* acceleration
This motion define force as the product of mass times Acceleration (vs.Velocity). Since acceleration is the change in velocity divided by time,
force=(mass*velocity)/time
such that, (mass*velocity)/time=momentum/time
Therefore we get mass*velocity=momentum
Momentum=mass*velocity
Elephant mass=6300 kg; velocity=0.11 m/s
Momentum=6300*0.11
P=693 kg (m/s)
Dolphin mass=50 kg; velocity=10.4 m/s
Momentum=50*10.4
P=520 kg (m/s)
The elephant has more momentum(P) because it is large.
Physics
Step-by-step answer
P Answered by PhD
The change in temperature is 9.52°CExplanation:Since, the heat supplied by the electric kettle is totally used to increase the temperature of the water.Thus, from the law of conservation of energy can be stated as:Heat Supplied by Electric Kettle = Heat Absorbed by WaterHeat Supplied by Electric Kettle = m C ΔTwhere,Heat Supplied by Electric Kettle = 20,000 JMass of water = m = 0.5 kgSpecific Heat Capacity of Water = C = 4200 J/kg.°CChange in Temperature of Water = ΔTTherefore,20,000 J = (0.5 kg)(4200 J/kg.°C) ΔTΔT = 20,000 J/(2100 J/°C)ΔT = 9.52°C
Physics
Step-by-step answer
P Answered by PhD
Weight of barbell (m) = 100 kg
Uplifted to height (h) = 2m
Time taken= 1.5 s
Work done by Jordan = potential energy stored in barbell = mgh
= 100×2×9.8
= 1960J
Power = energy/time
= 1960/1.5
1306.67watts

Try asking the Studen AI a question.

It will provide an instant answer!

FREE